First day of the courtcase against Christine Wels

Not necessarily. Not at all. :no:

The fact is that even in the United States people move around alot and very often, even in one local area, they don’t move away at all, and people have no idea of many of the tricks they have pulled, and this, the USA, is just one country, though we do indeed have alot of horse people coming into this country from other countries and leaving their history behind or arriving with a very colorful and embroidered version of their history. Even without that, there are always plenty of customers who are new to the business or the area and haven’t heard about things.

As far as official sources of information, how many of us have ever researched a trainer’s resume, and found out if they really did win those awards, or train those horses? How many of us ever ask a trainer for references, called them and discussed their activities with customers or employers in other states? How many of us ever really looked for a trainer’s criminal record, or look on the USEF site to see if they are suspended (keeping in mind it only has information about current suspensions)? The internet has made research easier, but do we really use it?

There are too many examples to name, I could write the longest post even in my history of long posts on that one. There is no public intercommunication of most law enforcement agencies, even today. You have to know where someone was in order to find out their history, and even then it is hard.

I think there is a great deal of roughness and forcefulness and loss of temper that doesn’t even qualify as abuse, and would never fit the legal definition and would never result in charges. So there’s that huge ‘gray area’ that would never cause anyone to have a record anyway.

people do look out for eachother, but there are enough new customers coming in all the time and enough transiency to guarantee people don’t know about many things.

The horsey grapevine is very weak at protecting people.

It is much more intrigued with divorces and who is dating who and who is gay - and the grapevine isn’t very good at all at protecting people or getting unadorned facts out about abuses or dishonesty. Abuse rumors may be spread about someone because they grabbed some students of a competitor or won a ribbon at a show - it’s almost impossible to rely on the grapevine for unadorned facts.

There is nothing to substitute for real consumer protection. The horsey grapevine is useless for that. Equine ‘consumers’ are fundamentally unprotected, the horse business is basically unregulated.

Maybe I am mistaken, but is this not a “second” trial on abuse, the other being in another country? If so, then holy crap, that means all you have to do is change locations and voila, the sentence from another country doesn’t follow, and if perchance you get caught again, that info is not brought up in court? I guess IMO the sad part is if she moves yet again across another border, her convictions don’t follow.

No, this is still about the first case. This was her appeal of the first conviction and has nothing to do with what occurred in Denmark.

It may be confusing to some people because someone already posted about this when it transpired the end of November.

So does this mean she will be stripped of any memberships/associations with any Equestrian Federations, relinquished of any training status etc.

I have seen amateur and professional North American and European riders beat their horses - once at a show behind the barn. If the federations (FEI) and organizations really want to eliminate this they would make it part of their policy to eliminate these riders/trainers from the circuit. Unfortunately these organizations sometimes excuse riders/trainers in pursuit of gold medals etc.

[QUOTE=egontoast;3716191]
No, this is still about the first case. This was her appeal of the first conviction and has nothing to do with what occurred in Denmark.

It may be confusing to some people because someone already posted about this when it transpired the end of November.[/QUOTE]

No this trial end of november was about the second case. Please see my translated report. The case in Denmark appeared to public during this second november case and is actually the third case now !

[QUOTE=slc2;3716186]
Not necessarily. Not at all. :no:

The fact is that even in the United States people move around alot and very often, even in one local area, they don’t move away at all, and people have no idea of many of the tricks they have pulled, and this, the USA, is just one country, though we do indeed have alot of horse people coming into this country from other countries and leaving their history behind or arriving with a very colorful and embroidered version of their history. Even without that, there are always plenty of customers who are new to the business or the area and haven’t heard about things.

As far as official sources of information, how many of us have ever researched a trainer’s resume, and found out if they really did win those awards, or train those horses? How many of us ever ask a trainer for references, called them and discussed their activities with customers or employers in other states? How many of us ever really looked for a trainer’s criminal record, or look on the USEF site to see if they are suspended (keeping in mind it only has information about current suspensions)? The internet has made research easier, but do we really use it?

There are too many examples to name, I could write the longest post even in my history of long posts on that one. There is no public intercommunication of most law enforcement agencies, even today. You have to know where someone was in order to find out their history, and even then it is hard.

I think there is a great deal of roughness and forcefulness and loss of temper that doesn’t even qualify as abuse, and would never fit the legal definition and would never result in charges. So there’s that huge ‘gray area’ that would never cause anyone to have a record anyway.

people do look out for eachother, but there are enough new customers coming in all the time and enough transiency to guarantee people don’t know about many things.

The horsey grapevine is very weak at protecting people.

It is much more intrigued with divorces and who is dating who and who is gay - and the grapevine isn’t very good at all at protecting people or getting unadorned facts out about abuses or dishonesty. Abuse rumors may be spread about someone because they grabbed some students of a competitor or won a ribbon at a show - it’s almost impossible to rely on the grapevine for unadorned facts.

There is nothing to substitute for real consumer protection. The horsey grapevine is useless for that. Equine ‘consumers’ are fundamentally unprotected, the horse business is basically unregulated.[/QUOTE]

One of the best posts EVER! I agree completely. But I wouldn’t discount the amount of protection riding “cliques” offer to individuals in the US. A lot of abuse is covered up, simply ignored, or silenced by those who feel threatened by the truth. Individuals need to take more responsibility for their horses and themselves and be willing to suffer the consequences. Some people also just need to wake up… just because your friend says it’s “okay” doesn’t make it okay. Didn’t we learn this lesson in elementary school??? :frowning:

[QUOTE=Go Fish;3716178]
I don’t get why her reputation/criminal history in Germany didn’t follow her to Denmark. Since the countries border each other and it is common for horsepeople to travel back and forth for shows/events/clinics, etc., you’d think every horseperson would know about her and her training methods. The horse community is a small world…word travels fast.[/QUOTE]

Even though Denmark is not to far from where she was in Northern Germany and even though travelling is easy now, we just do not travel that much in the horsescene. She was not in the big show scene that may even travel to denmark. the level she teaches at is about people that in Germany/Europe need to travel 100 - 200 miles mostly less to their shows. All is so close here and as someone else said. Even in the very same close area you often do not happen to get to know about dishonest people in the horse business. Only in cases like this or the quite famous Serge van Der Wulp who cheated a lot of people buying and selling horses all over the world and now searched by international police things are known all over the world.

Mr. Ward (Forget his firstname) was once caught in germany at famous Aachen show doing something not really nice to his horses. he got banned for a lifetime from those showgrounds. And ??? what happened ? Some officials in germany were fearing a few years later that this might be a scandal if he would not have been allowed to compete at the WEG in Aachen. Heck, why did they allow it ?
If these people know that in the end they get awy with it they do it again.

Same with that case of germany at Hongkong. That guy said “well I just used some sort of ointment that you can buy in any tack store”. No in germany you can’t ! You can’t buy similar stuff. The stuff he used and showed in an TV interview is not available at all in Germany. A slap into the face of all honest riders ! He did not even pay attention to what he considered normal was not normal at all. If he used the stuff he must have gone before through some sort of hassle to get it ! E.g. driving to the Netherlands (europse medicine paradise in a lot of things) and pick it up there. Importing any sort of medical stuff is clearly forbidden in Germany no matter what it is (we actually are breaking the law if we buy much much cheaper advil in netherlands, USA or Turkey and bring it home) Dewormeser cost an arm and a leg in germany. 15 - 30 euros but still importing them is forbidden ! So if we do not watch out and stick to our moral, these people will always be the winners. be it Mrs. Wels with the laughable sentance she got or that German jumping rider (sorry even missing his name at this very moment) or Mr. Ward etc.

It is like SLC2 writes people are too protected in the horse scene. And it is us to make a difference by saying no !
Not too long ago my friend told me I saw xyz in the parking lot after he finished his class hitting his horse hard. I asked and what did you do ? She said if I go to the official judge looking after the training area he will say he did not do it xyz is a rider known in the area and also a judge. So I asked, why did you not just walk up to him ? well , ehm . She did not know.

Last year I saw at a show a girl hitting her horse hard after a jumping course in the warm up area. And ot just ounce. A lot of people watched. I just yelled right all across the warm up area, hey stop it immediatly. Everyone turned and for her it was clear she was meant and everyone heard and saw that she was meant. She rode away a bit out of sight and did it again. I yelled again all over the place. And just by yelling at her and getting all the attention to her the pressure was to high on her and she stopped. Since than I think that is what you have to do: sort of expose what the do to the public. A lot of people are very very proud about their reputation. This is maybe even more effective than walking up to them and say directly to them stop it.

No this trial end of november was about the second case. Please see my translated report. The case in Denmark appeared to public during this second november case and is actually the third case now !

Ok, I am confused now . What were the circumstances of the second German case? She was on probation, so if there was a second case in germany, her A## should be in jail.

I thought the recent case in germany was her appeal of the original conviction. I don’t have time to go back and read everything again.

Which Ward are you talking about? Mclain or his father Barney? Because if memory serves me well, Barney Ward was imprisoned for insurance fraud years ago for intentionally killing expensive horses in order to collect the insurance. He obviously got his comeuppance, but of course it’s only because there was $$$ involved and an insurance company.

Mclain isn’t that much better either…

Here is a nice summary:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/11/AR2007101101827.html

Actually now where yu say we even heard back than about the insurance thing. But in this case McLain !

“It is like SLC2 writes people are too protected in the horse scene”

Not protected enough, I think. Information is the best weapon.

But I feel we can’t always blame ‘someone else’. Some of it, we have to ask ourselves, why we are afraid to do what alexandra did. I know very few people who would actually do something like that - many would say they would, but couldn’t when it came down to it.

I don’t disagree with discipline for horses. But it has to have limits and Ms Wels is well beyond any sort of rational limit of anything, even some sense of her own self preservation. My SO watched that video and said, ‘She must want to commit suicide, that seems to be as effective a way as any’. Horses that are beaten and roughed up are, first and foremost, erratic, unpredictable and dangerous.

Most of the old timer trainers I’ve met were not at all ethically against getting after a horse, but all taught me one thing - if you want to lose your temper, be sure you understand the one most likely to be harmed next is - YOU. Anyone who does what Wels does has to have some sort of self destructive impulse (probably not actually consciously wanting to self harm, just not having the control of temper to prevent it).

I’ve seen horses of all types, any type, any breeding turn on people, and frankly, the most fearful, timid animal is probably THE most dangerous abused animal of all.

The WORST thing I ever saw was the timid, quiet warmblood that stood there all cowed and trembling obediently standing there, and the next second just flew across the stall in the air, all teeth and front feet at the vet the next second. The cowed, obedient, timid horse is THE most likely to surprise one. The vet was VERY ready to run out the stall and in fact had already positioned herself to make a hasty escape.

This, however is the important fact. She told me, ‘Any horse can do that, ANY, at ANY TIME. Don’t you EVER think anything different, Don’t you EVER imagine that can’t happen at any time’.

Various posts here suggesting some breeds won’t and others will harm a handler or trainer if put in a spot, are totally, completely ridiculous. In fact, these are both dangerous and irresponsible statements, and people saying that kind of nonsense should apologize here. I’ve never read anything so ridiculous in my life that ‘warmbloods put up with abuse’ or ‘thoroughbreds and arabs won’t’. It’s embarassing to even imagine anyone would ever say such a thing that is so untrue.

The timider and more forebearing the animal, the quieter and more cooperative, the more likely he is to be put into a tight corner and then go completely insane.

I don’t feel everyone has a rational or reasonable concept of discipline and I feel that training needs to be both persistent and at times firm, how people might word, in an internet post, where they draw the line, is usually far LESS different than arguments here might suggest.

The key for me is that some people do NOT have sufficient control of their temper where they should be working with horses at all.

People like Christina Wels do not change. They plead guilty in court when it serves their purposes. They are hard-wired to act like this. They do not change. I have yet, in my long and bumpy life, ever seen anyone change that, except for one man who actually had a brain condition that caused his violence, which was almost like a seizure. Medication completely stopped his violence. But unlike Wels, he lives every day regretting what he did.

Wels made it very obvious in the videos that she has no capability of remorse. In fact, she attempted to argue that all horse trainers do what she does and that it is normal, and people who don’t GET that are just ignorant. This is very typical of the kinds of rationalizations you hear from these people.

This sort of thinking pattern never actually goes away. It’s an innate part of a person, it is hard wired, in the brain. There is something missing from the brain. You can’t put it in there. All you can do is put the person on a short leash and watch them like a hawk, because they will never, ever be any different. This woman is nearly sixty years old if i recall. She has been like this for decades. She cannot develop a theory of mind.

It is the inability to feel, to have a theory of mind about how sentient beings react to what one does.

If a child trips and falls near me, I do the ‘mom thing’. I’m sure most moms feel this, quite a few people do, to the point of wincing or even feeling a twinge of pain themselves. When their kid hurts, THEY HURT. This is theory of mind in action. You know, you feel, you SENSE, what the other one feels. YOU KNOW IT HURTS.

Years ago I was in college, and a lady told me her father trained her horse to always go in the barn when it was called. One time it would not, and the father taught the horse never to do that again. Even in a large pasture.

The lady told me that the father chased the horse around the pasture for hours, throwing a hammer at its head til its head was bloody. He wasn’t just throwing the hammer, he was connecting. Alot. She said if the horse ever wouldn’t go in the barn when called, all you had to do is bend over and act like you were picking something up, and the horse would run for the barn, no matter how far away from you it was in the pasture.

She laughed about it. She laughed the entire time she told the story.

I’m not sure, but the laughter suggested to me that she thought it was funny to throw a hammer at a horse’s head and bloody it. Perhaps just funny how mad her father was. In any case, she thought SOMETHING about it was funny. She had plenty of compassion for people; she was taught to feel this way about livestock. In the end, what is innate in us and what we learn, BOTH may be relatively inflexible.

Learning can be very, very hard to unlearn. It can be just about as fixed as biology, unless the person is taken out of the environment that taught him that. Taken out of his usual environment, even the surviving Mumbai terrorist quickly began to wonder at how easily and quickly he was brainwashed into participating in those attacks. Send him back to where he came from, it will be the same again, it’s a place where those attacks are noble and admired.

A doctor told me my autistic friend’s mom he didn’t need a local anasthetic to get stitches in a large cut because ‘they don’t feel things like we do’, despite the fact the kid was sitting there screaming his head off while he stitched.

Learning is amazingly powerful. For better or worse.

One way or the other, some people aren’t ever going to have much sense around livestock. They, as well as Christine Wels, should be permanently prevented from having anything to do with horses. I frankly don’t understand the court’s judgement, especially in a country that is far better than ours at prosecuting animal abusers.

Please read www.reitforum.de to find out the latest stories.