flying / running W?

Yah know, this got me to thinking…

I’m pretty sure (but not positive so don’t quote me) that Tom Ryder wrote a story/article in one CAA journal about his Uncle John (if you ever read Tom’s recollections of his youth in the 1910-1920’s, you’d know about his Uncle John who ran a livery in England) and a groom using a Running W on a little Thoroughbred mare they’d gotten in for training. Seems this little mare didn’t know the meaning of “whoa” and she’d just keep going faster and faster, regardless of rein commands to slow or halt. This, not being a desirable trait in harness, needed to be modified. So they rigged up a running W, and had a photographer record the training session, getting a shot the split second when the legs were pulled out from under the horse, and the horse heading down to the grassy turf on its knees. I’m pretty sure the photo showed the horse was equipped with knee guards as the object was to teach the horse to stop when the reins and/or voice commanded “whoa”, but not to scar or damage knee tissue (aka: “break the knees”) which would have sent any resale value straight into the toilet.

I think Tom said Uncle John and the groom had to use the W several times before the little Thoroughbred figured it out. Apparently she turned out to be a cute little driving horse, and was subsequently sold as such.

I’d probably have to go through several decades of CAA Journals to find it…Tom was a prolific writer and never missed a deadline in his long life of writing about his youth … but if I found it, I would certainly post the photo. It is a classic example of using the Running W in a 1910-20 timeframe.

[QUOTE=Thomas_1;5137536]
So you came here to ask drivers about what you saw because you hadn’t a clue what it even was.

Yet now you’ve got an opinion on what you would choose to do as a preference and what tack you would choose to use even though you’ve been told by DRIVERS that it’s rough and abusive and ineffective !
[/QUOTE]What I would choose to do is not drive. Which is why I don’t. Not saying no one should drive, but I’m too risk-averse for that kind of interaction with horses.

What I said was:

And frankly, knowing that the calmest, quietest of equines is still a flight animal, I can see their point.

Given the choice of injuring a bunch of people or taking an animal to its knees, I know what my choice would be.

And I stand by it. Are you saying that you would rather have a bunch of people get injured or even killed than risk damage to a horse?

Here’s a side view of the mule on the right, and a bit of a close-up of where the rope was tied to the wagon. I was wondering if perhaps they just had it tied loosely to keep it out of the way while the wagon was stationary, but that doesn’t appear to be the case. I can’t tell if that thing it’s tied to is rigid, or is a lever of some kind.

For whatever this is worth.

Now I wish I had brought the camera and taken more photos.

I wonder if they would have objected…

ropeTied.jpg

sideView.jpg

[QUOTE=Risk-Averse Rider;5138533]
Here’s a side view of the mule on the right, and a bit of a close-up of where the rope was tied to the wagon. I was wondering if perhaps they just had it tied loosely to keep it out of the way while the wagon was stationary, but that doesn’t appear to be the case. I can’t tell if that thing it’s tied to is rigid, or is a lever of some kind.

For whatever this is worth.

Now I wish I had brought the camera and taken more photos.

I wonder if they would have objected…[/QUOTE]

Neat! Thanks again, RAR, for the close up.

I still can’t figure out that post/bar/lever, but it appears to have a stretchy black bungie below it, for whatever reason. Doesn’t appear to be a brake of any kind. Maybe just decoration??

We need a mule and wagon person to educate us. :smiley:

[QUOTE=Risk-Averse Rider;5138530]

And I stand by it. Are you saying that you would rather have a bunch of people get injured or even killed than risk damage to a horse?[/QUOTE] No. I’m saying it’s a great way to get people injured and killed AS WELL AS the mule!

Remind me not to rely on your judgement when it comes to managing risk. Seemingly you’re prepared to take a lot more than I am.

When viewing the close up photos I only wonder what the hell they’re doing.

Nothing fits! The arrangement for attaching the mules to the pole and to the swingletree is like nothing I’ve ever seen!

To be clear what I actually mean by that is DANGEROUS AND INSECURE!!

Say, Tom - don’t rag on RAR. She’s a super nice person, very caring horsewoman, not a driver, and so what was visually presented to her wasn’t something she could examine as good or bad with a decades old expert’s eye.

Like so many who don’t have working knowledge, she was curious…and being a long time COTH person …came here to ask about that strange device she saw. Expressing her opinion - in light of the fact that she talked to the drivers (whom she naturally considered knew more than she did about harness and mules and commercial farm vehicle driving for the public), got their viewpoint, observed the mules being quiet and mannerly and friendly, and saw nothing actually happen that spelled “DANGER!!!” - is fine. Being attacked as stupid, implied or otherwise, is another.

In the arena of western/draft/mule driving this type of harness and harnessing is par, and has been for decades. Certainly not what I would use on my Welsh pair, but it is traditional to the “field and plow working” groups here in the US, as are the vehicles. There are long traditions - going back to the 1700’s in all areas of the US - of harnessing for mule and draft driving, and their methods were tried and true for those heavy and/or hybrid breeds when it came to driving/working/living in the rough backwater territory of the early colonies and later (and more specifically recently per the historical timeline) in the old West. Those traditions and types of harnessing to vehicles came down intact to our times - just like any other type of regional history - and the modern skinner (guess they aren’t really called that any more) feel as strongly about following their own tradition, and using their traditional wagons with the traditional features, as we do ours with our light, pleasure breeds.

So, please – again – don’t rag on RAR. She’s a super nice person, willing and happily sharing with us what she saw, and was told by the mule driver at the time, to gain a bit of understanding about the device called the Running W. She certainly neither needs nor deserves the tone implied in your comment above.

Please.

You read wayyyy too much into what I said.

So to sum up:

Nice person sees something that she doesn’t understand and isn’t sure of.

Comes to ask what it is and why it’s used.

Is told by experienced drivers why it shouldn’t be used and doesn’t sound right or feel right.

Comes back to say that in her opinion she’d use it to reduce risk.

Is told by experienced drivers why it shouldn’t be used and doesn’t sound right or feel right.

Comes back to say that in her opinion she’d use it to save lives of people. Also queries whether experienced drivers just care less about people than horses. Adds that she took this decision because she’s the same personality type as her username.

Is told by experienced drivers why it shouldn’t be used and doesn’t sound right or feel right.


So where’s the bit about the OP not being a nice person? ! ?

As far as I’m concerned it’s a simple matter. Ask a question. Get the answer. Then argue whether it’s right!

This must be the internet then!!

[QUOTE=Thomas_1;5138776]
You read wayyyy too much into what I said.

So to sum up:

Nice person sees something that she doesn’t understand and isn’t sure of.

Comes to ask what it is and why it’s used.

Is told by experienced drivers why it shouldn’t be used and doesn’t sound right or feel right.

Comes back to say that in her opinion she’d use it to reduce risk.

Is told by experienced drivers why it shouldn’t be used and doesn’t sound right or feel right.

Comes back to say that in her opinion she’d use it to save lives of people. Also queries whether experienced drivers just care less about people than horses. Adds that she took this decision because she’s the same personality type as her username.

Is told by experienced drivers why it shouldn’t be used and doesn’t sound right or feel right.


So where’s the bit about the OP not being a nice person? ! ?

As far as I’m concerned it’s a simple matter. Ask a question. Get the answer. Then argue whether it’s right!

This must be the internet then!![/QUOTE]

I agree Thomas.

“What I would choose to do is not drive. Which is why I don’t. Not saying no one should drive, but I’m too risk-averse for that kind of interaction with horses.”

"And frankly, knowing that the calmest, quietest of equines is still a flight animal, I can see their point.

Given the choice of injuring a bunch of people or taking an animal to its knees, I know what my choice would be. "

Look at those quotes. Think about them. She may be a “Nice person” -with no driving knowledge that is essentially writing that we are ALL UNSAFE because we don’t use a running W. Even though person has been advised by more than one person on this list here that running Ws are not only dangerous to the horse but to the public. There are plenty of examples of horses going down -with my horses that would mean a ton going down with the other horse not -if there was anyone on the ground, they would be injured. In the case of true bolting, I would be surprised if someone could pull one of my horses down with a running W but if they did? It would be a disaster -probably worse than in most cases the bolt just ending on its own.

Was I offended by the remarks? YES!!! Am I defensive that someone, a person who doesn’t even know driving is essentially writing that we are all unsafe because we don’t use such a device? YES!!! Do I find it kind of sad that these old devices -that were looked down upon a 100 years ago and are even banned in the movie industry are making a come-back? YES!!! It is revisionist history to think that how horses were trained 100 years ago is somehow “better” than now. We have written records, we know that results of these training methods.

Like Thomas, I collect old books and what passed for training was often awful and produced awful results. Sure, there were excellent horse people but often -quick and dirty were the game. People weren’t horsemen, they used horses as a tool. Big ports, unsafe carriage/wagon designs (because they didn’t have better designs or modern technologies to make them), dirty tricks, etc. In many liveries “out west,” a horse rental deposit was the price of the horse and tack because horses came by dead or lamed too many times. For instance, Richard Dana writes in "Two Years Before the Mast " that the livery man told him about a lot (maybe half) of his horses came back to him only to be shot or didn’t come back at all -they were run till they died while being rented out. Don’t kid yourself, the traditions in this country aren’t all so nice and caused many deaths of horses and people.

But right now, there is a resurgence in worshiping the old methods without even delving into whether they were effective or humane in certain traditional driving groups. The older voices of the past (the grandfathers -who might have worked the horses or driven them daily) that would advise caution against using such devices all the time are almost all gone. What is left is people advocating such devices that are unsafe. In the last six months, I have seen written a number of times -methods and training devices that are unsafe but might have been used occasionally by a trainer but not all the time -unless they were yahoos. Devices such as the running W for daily use or another recent example was tying horses to a post to break them to a huge wagon -as a first vehicle, to the point where the animal is panicked and on the ground (“hey, but no harm done -right? And he won’t do THAT again”). There is no voice of moderation that seems to get through to these wanna-be old-timers.

But newbies are often lapping up these methods as gospel. That is a sad state of affairs.

Clearly, I’m failing miserably at saying what I’m trying to say, and it’s not getting any better.

I apologize for any implication that I think you guys don’t know what you’re talking about.

Now I am going to take my worthless dumb-ass self back to the land of coding web sites, leaving you with my thanks for the information & insights, and regret at having caused a train wreck.

RAR…I just got done doing a weekend where I drove both days on a friends farm for their farm day in our county with my team of Percheron mares. My left mare, Trixie, has been out in public due to us showing her all last year, but not in a setting as we were in this weekend, though my friend I bought her from had her out in public settings single.
http://i669.photobucket.com/albums/vv57/GreySorrel/83bda036.jpg

In the two days I drove, Saturday I drove for 4 and a half hours with only a 10 minute break here and there for the team. Sunday we drove for 5 hours, this time getting a half hour break for lunch. We drove by cars going in and out, around kids on bikes or running in front of us, screaming kids, people who knew no better and walked right up to them and touched them on the side, etc. Never once did I worry that my team would bolt, spook, or hurt anyone, if I even had a shadow of a doubt, I wouldn’t of put them, or I, in a public setting.

When we got to the farm Saturday morning, we walked the team around, letting them see and smell everything, as this is also a horse farm so a lot of new sites. When a person is doing something with the public, it is my personal opinion that those animals had best be dead broke to whatever it is that your doing. The public is entrusting you to keep them and their family safe. If you can’t do that without a gimmick that can harm or potentially kill that animal and you in the process, you have no business being there in the first place.

Because we did so well, we were asked to come back again and do this for them next year. I even had children sitting in my lap while driving, I trust my team and I trust them, as they trust me, to take care of me, and I them. Having a good team that you can trust in any setting is something that doesn’t come along often unless there has been training, practice, a lot of hard work, and they are worth their weight in gold.

Bottom line, I have to agree with Jill, it is a bit offensive for you to feel you were “safer” with those who had a running W on their animals vs those of us who have taken the time to ensure, beyond a shadow of a doubt that our team is dependable in public without a harsh measure. Yes, our animals are flight or fight, but if your basing your observation on that, then I suggest you get out of riding a horse at all, as how do you even trust your own with that type of mind set?

I cannot imagine myself ever using a running w, but if i had a team, i would think i’d want them both to have a runningw, not just one.
In other words, I’d want them both to fall, not just one, and the other keep bolting.

As far as training…no way, I want the horse to learn whoa, etc by voice and repetition.

I do have a question.
I know of a person/acquaintence that had a team of very well trained horses.
Very unfortunately, when he got to his barn, one of them rubbed and dislodged the bridle, and the two bolted, a serious bolt running for a few miles, and well, it ended in disaster for the team.

So, I am wondering, if in this situation, or the Iowa one too, or any where you have well trained horses and something goes wrong, if a running w could be the insurance policy. I would hate to use it, but if it was to save lives, could folks see its use?

I want to be clear, nothing beats a well trained team, or pair, nothing, but, could this prevent an accident? Also, can you adjust the pull, so the horses don’t violently fall, but sort of just go down on their knees?

Just asking here.

I’ll try again.

Five Horses, Using a Running W would be approaching the problem arse about face.

What you should do is ensure a bridle can’t become dislodged. There’s so much I want to ask about how the heck your friend got himself into the situation that he had a horse with a bridle off… and then escalated to a bolt??? So much wrong just with that very sentence! To have that happen in itself is ringing HUGE alarm bells as in “BEWARE!!! SOMEONE DOESN’T KNOW WHAT THEY’RE DOING!!”

I’ll say it again. A running W does not prevent an accident. It causes one!

You pull the rope and the horse drops like a stone.

You go out of the carriage and if the horse is just one of a pair or a team then in all likelihood the one that hadn’t spooked in the first place is now going to be shit scared and it’s now going to bolt.

Only by now you’ve got your driver on the floor just injured or killed by half a ton of carriage or a hard surface!

Not an expert but we were still using a draft team when I was growing up on the ranch. The post/bar is in the center of the wagon and is what the driver wraps the reins around when he gets down from the wagon so the reins don’t slide off and fall to the ground. The foot rope is apparantly looped around the bar for the same reason, to make sure it doesn’t slide off and drop.

When you are working a team, you do not take the reins with you when you get down from the wagon to open/close gates, load something in the wagon, clear the sickle bar on the mower, etc. The team (or at least all of the working draft teams I’ve been around) were trained to stand while the driver was on the ground loading/working.

[QUOTE=fivehorses;5138978]
I cannot imagine myself ever using a running w, but if i had a team, i would think i’d want them both to have a runningw, not just one.
In other words, I’d want them both to fall, not just one, and the other keep bolting.

As far as training…no way, I want the horse to learn whoa, etc by voice and repetition.

I do have a question.
I know of a person/acquaintence that had a team of very well trained horses.
Very unfortunately, when he got to his barn, one of them rubbed and dislodged the bridle, and the two bolted, a serious bolt running for a few miles, and well, it ended in disaster for the team.

So, I am wondering, if in this situation, or the Iowa one too, or any where you have well trained horses and something goes wrong, if a running w could be the insurance policy. I would hate to use it, but if it was to save lives, could folks see its use?

I want to be clear, nothing beats a well trained team, or pair, nothing, but, could this prevent an accident? Also, can you adjust the pull, so the horses don’t violently fall, but sort of just go down on their knees?

Just asking here.[/QUOTE]

In my opinion -In a true bolt, with a big team -the lines would be jerked from your hands ASAP or the lines would break -even with a pulley system. Ever tried to hold a draft’s foot up that chose to slam it down during picking a foot? And that is at a stand still.

In the past, in movies -when horses were put at a dead gallop and then a running W (made of a cuff with wire) was used to stop those horses by anchoring it to the ground, there were spectacular wrecks -horses usually summersaulted -often involving stage coaches. They don’t go down gently -they often broke a leg and were put down. The carriages would fly apart. One of the Errol Flynn movies had dozens of horses die with the use of a running W and movie actors die/injured. It was banned in the USA in 1939 from movie making. Eventually the use of the running W was banned worldwide in movie making.

Yakima Canutt, an amazing horsemen was the inventor of the running W used in the movies. "One of Yakima’s inventions was the notorious ‘Running W’ stunt, which was a method of bringing down a horse at the gallop by attaching a wire, anchored to the ground, to its fetlocks and so launching the rider forwards spectacularly at a designated point. "

““In the five years between 1925 and 1930, fifty-five people were killed making movies, and more than ten thousand injured.” – from Falling: How Our Greatest Fear Became Our Greatest Thrill by Garrett Soden.”

If you think this technique is going to save people from a true bolt -no it is not. There is a lot of evidence from the movie making industry about what happens when a running W is used to stop horses at a dead run. As a training device, when a horse won’t whoa at a walk -well, I just haven’t had that issue in training my horses. If you can’t get a whoa at a walk, you don’t belong on the road!

As a device to stop a true bolt, in my opinion and most teamsters opinion, it is not going to work! Most likely more harm than good will come of it. Particularly as it is a complex device to use and it is often put in the hands of people not trained to do so.

As more and more people advocate it (not from experience of it actually working for a bolt) but because they seem to feel a need to do “something,” I imagine it will just be a matter of time before some spectacular wrecks occur.

Anyone who thinks this was ever a common device, just go google historical photos of driving horses. Let me know how many you have to look at before you find a running W being used. I just pulled out a bunch of “Percheron News,” dating back 100 years to present. Not one photo could I find of anyone using such a device. It was not done with my breed -that is for darn sure!

Not necessarily. I’ve only seen one used twice, two different people with two different horses, so I’m not an expert, certainly. However, in both cases I saw personally, the horse in question did not “drop” … the running W can be used so it impedes full use of one, perhaps both, front feet, but the way I saw them used, it was never used in a way that immediately pulled both front feet out from under the horse.

One horse did end up on his knees (in the plowed field) a couple of times, but even then one foot was taken up and he hopped on the other front foot once or twice before that foot came out from under him. The other horse stopped as soon as the first foot came up. I never saw either horse go completely down on a shoulder or side.

In fact, that is not what you want to happen, for exactly the reasons stated. You don’t want one horse in a team, hitched to a wagon, to go completely down in harness, breaking the tongue, tangled and kicking. But a horse who has been “exposed” to a running W, unless completely freaked by something, will stop when he feels the rope tighten up on the foot.

GTD I am going to say the piece the rope is tied to in the photo is strictly a rein holder. Many wagons have a T shape in front made of wood for anchoring the reins of Draft animals. This is a hame, brass knob and all, used as a rein anchor at the front of vehicle. Just some use of material from around the barn, keeps the reins out of the dirt when they are hitching or unhitching. I would agree that decorative hame does nothing in the lever department, not a brake lever, just fastened to the dash area of the wagon.

I am not sure what the black, bungee looking part is for. Could be some modification done to that wagon for reasons unknown.

I am going to say that the rope is tied on the rein holder because the driver does not EXPECT trouble, but has the rope at-hand, if he thinks he should need it. Driver or front seat passenger would lean over and pick up the rope before pulling to drop the mule. Draft set ups I have seen, seldom have the rope in-hand all the time, after the first few hitchings. They just want the rope available for fixing the whoa problem, easy to reach quickly.

Thank you! :slight_smile: Now I see why that bar was positioned in the center of the dash - it allows the driver easy access to the secured reins when climbing up either side of the wagon.

goodhors - I did notice the swelled top of the bar and the curve to it - I thought it looked suspiciously like a draft hame, but wasn’t sure. Actually, it is perfectly designed to prevent whatever was tied to the bar to slip accidentally over the top. Kinda interesting and unique “second life” for a single hame!

Thanks for the education! :smiley: