Forum UPGRADE Input!

[QUOTE=nasalberry;5964351]
Yes. Sometimes it is like being in classroom of 1st-graders and all of them talking at once. They read the OP, and it is like does not even matter that 23 people already gave the same answer: they don’t care to read, just voice their opinion. It does get tiresome.

Can anything be done about this redundancy? It would surely cut down on CoTH’s bandwidth at least. Anyone have ideas?[/QUOTE]

I think that the solution here is to teach people to read the whole thread first. Good luck.

It would be really nice if any OP’s posts in their own thread their name was bolded at the top of the post. Or the background on their top bar was a slightly different colour or something

That’s a super idea- I like the idea of the header bar being a different color for the OP than for other posters.

Originally Posted by trubandloki
Who gets to decide who is being redundant and who is adding more agreement to a thought?

You posted the same thought as someone else. Are you redundant?

[QUOTE=nasalberry;5964620]
At least I read every post. :wink:

If someone asks: “Shoes or Barefoot?” it is not redundant to have 87 different people pick one or the other; some with the same reasons.

If someone asks: “Is a rhino vaccine for a cold-like virus or for a flu-like virus?” and 86 people all answer “a cold-like virus” or “I didn’t read of the replies, but it’s for a cold!” that, imo, is redundancy.
If 1 person answers Rhinopneumonitis vac is for the ‘cold-like virus’ and the Influenza vac is for the Influenza virus, and FWIW, Strangles is the equine equivalent to distemper.", that is not redundant so much as expounding the previous answers.
:)[/QUOTE]

I like the multiple buttons idea. A thumbs-up/agree. Thumbs-down/disagree. A smile icon for helpful/frown for not helpful. Maybe a “this post is redundant” head-on-desk icon? :lol:

Just popping in to reassure you that we’re reading everything!

Thanks again for the thoughtful suggestions and feedback. It’s obviously impossible to reach a consensus, but it’s very helpful to hear your ideas and reasoning (and nice comments about the site!) – all will be considered and processed.

We do have limitations with some of the options we can offer due to software constraints, so some things may not be workable even if everyone would love to see them. We don’t want to affect the brainstorming at this point by inserting a “reality check” on what’s available, so feel free to highlight things on your wish lists. :slight_smile:

Keep 'em coming ~
Mod 1

[QUOTE=alterhorse;5965710]
If you click on a users name it should open a list of choices that include “Find all posts by this user”. [/QUOTE]

Yes but doing that doesn’t give you only their posts in that one thread :lol:.

So if they are prolific you can be searching through a lot before you get to the posts you’re looking for.

I would just like to be able to click a user, ‘get all posts in this thread’ and get a page; so that you could quickly catch up on an OP, for example. If you use the thread search function you also get when that person was mentioned or quoted.

I’d just like to see it prettied up so it was easier.

[QUOTE=MHM;5965805]
No, but it’s not exactly hard to do.[/QUOTE]

:eek::eek:

That is exactly what I’m talking about! I had no idea you could do that!!! :lol:

Ayup, like over on Something Awful.

For example (I think their boards are open to non-members now) check out this thread:

http://forums.somethingawful.com/showthread.php?threadid=3440204

Now, see the little “?” on the bottom left, under the user name, for each post on that thread? It’s in between “#” and the date. Click that and it will display all the posts by that user in that thread, in thread view for easy reading.

I would LOVE to have something like that!

I’m in the NO for the western forum camp.

I would like the search function to be fine tuned, and spell check would be nice.

No to a permanent off topic forum. Like someone else said, it’s a treat on occasion. If was open all the time, I think at the least it could get boring, and at the worst it could get crazy-out of hand:winkgrin:

Facebook integration?

Is it crazy to ask for a facebook link/facebook integration? A way to share certain posts more easily? I’m lukewarm on the western idea.

I have sometimes found it hard to find the best place to post some questions – like equipment recommendations for things like horse boots or bits that are not discipline-specific–end up in horse care. Has COTH considered an equipment/tack forum?

[QUOTE=Nes;5967667]
Yes but doing that doesn’t give you only their posts in that one thread :lol:.

So if they are prolific you can be searching through a lot before you get to the posts you’re looking for.

I would just like to be able to click a user, ‘get all posts in this thread’ and get a page; so that you could quickly catch up on an OP, for example. If you use the thread search function you also get when that person was mentioned or quoted.

I’d just like to see it prettied up so it was easier.[/QUOTE]

Sure you can. Go to the top of the page…Search this thread, click on advanced. Search. Presto, kazam. Magic.

Maybe someone should write a COTH guide…COTH for Dummies? (note, I am NOT implying that you are a dummy, Nes…just the title of the series).

[QUOTE=poltroon;5960190]

For y’all behind the scenes, you obviously need some better spammer deterrents and possibly a way that we as the users can blow a spammy comment away for you so you don’t have to be patrolling at midnight for crazy deals on iPads. Like perhaps if n of us mark something as spam it goes away without your direct intervention.[/QUOTE]

I think that could be abused…don’t like someone, get a couple of people to gang up and “poof” their post is gone.

Why are so many against a western forum? Not interested, don’t read it. Pretty simple. Note, I’m not a Western rider.

The changes sound very good. Bravo to CotH for giving us such a great place to communicate with fellow CotHers.

I am with those who want to keep things simple, clean and somewhat adult. If options are added that may make it difficult for those with slow connections (pictures, etc) could there be a user option to open without them?
I would like an auto-spellcheck, but it would have to speak horseperson!

I dont see a huge need for additional forums from the membership (except a few vocal western riders). I would imagine adding them would be in hopes of attacting more sponsors, so probably worth a try. Might attract some educated reiners, etc to add to the community, or it might be a dud or a headache - IDK.
PS. Not a fan of Like button. Too Jr High for me.

I would like to see images embedded in posts and definitely a Western Forum.

Happy Trails~
Joyce

With regard to the images able to be added in-line and the dial-up situation- my take on this was that inline images would be a premium member feature. That should help keep the number of images down in the first place. Another option which I’ve seen many forums implement, although I’m not certain if this board’s software does allow it (and although I understand your point, Mod1, since you are soliciting our opinions, I’ll tell you that I would rather know what is a pipe dream and what isn’t beforehand so that I can make viable suggestions rather than waste my breath :smiley: ) is a forced restriction on image size. No larger than 500 pixels tall or wide. If you upload a picture that is larger than that, it is automatically scaled such that its longest side is no more than 500 pixels.

Further, restrict the number of images per post to three.

I am very lucky to have left my dial-up days behind, but worked off of it for more years than I’d have liked due to living in the sticks, and my computer and connection were able to handle the above without too much trouble.

Western forum: fine w/me. Could be interesting.

Extra smilies: don’t care but dislike their overuse.

Like/Dislike/Thumbs up or Thumbs down: Meh. Not so sure this won’t turn into a distracting “popularity” contest.

Permanent Off-topic: Bad idea. Strongly prefer the current method of a special occasion forum which makes for a fast moving and popular forum. Also, a perm one will potentially a)bring out non-horse people and b) explode the # of political whack jobs & tinfoil threads.

Mobile app: I don’t have a problem reading on my Windows 7 smartphone but it may be a nice option for others.

Search function:The current one doesn’t give back the best results. Too many results with little to no relation to what I’m searching for.

Please keep the forum clean, uncluttered, simple in design and function.

I’d like a “bookmark post” feature so that I can have a file of brilliant things said

I’d love a mobile app. My concern with a mobile app is simply whether it would lose too many features. Facebook for Android, for example, makes it really hard for me to do a lot of pretty basic things that I can do on Facebook using a browser (see who likes a post, search friends, search groups).

I’d like to be able to bookmark posts that I like or find useful.

I’m also concerned about “bloat” as I sometimes have to use dial-up. Gmail has an option when you’re loading it to use straight HTML. I like that Gmail has a work-around that appears almost as soon as the site starts loading which enables the site to load faster for dial-up users.

I like the idea of a permanent off-topic forum, but I’m wondering if maybe several forums like “The Menagerie” could be added–Relationships, Career, Academia, Law and Politics, Entertainment, Family Life. It seems like every off-topic day ends up revolving around those things. Who is dumping who, who hates their job and is looking for a change, who is trying to find a major, how ridiculous this new law is, what everyone is reading, what movies people want to see, how to handle unruly teenagers, etc. I think that we end up talking about horses even in off-topic day threads.

I especially like the idea of the “business” forum, because the stuff that borders on advertising is usually the sort of thing we really need to know. In conjunction with a business forum, I would suggest beefing up the polls feature, and making it easier to vote anonymously while commenting publicly.

I won’t use the Western/Reining forum but I have no objections to it being present. I wouldn’t want to get a “Western/Reining” issue in my mailbox, but the occasional article could be interesting.

Couldn’t care less about the smilies. I personally find features like livejournal’s “mood” to be more useful than emoticons.

I would like a wider layout.

I wish the forums had a more intuitive search feature. As it is, it doesn’t do too well with multiple search terms.

Finally, I think it would be cool if COTH did something like WaPo’s weekly chat with Emily Yoffe of Dear Prudence: have a guest moderator every week do a live chat with COTH forum users. One week George Morris could tell us all to do more stirrup-less work, and another week, the Maclay winner could tell us what it’s like to be a teen dream.

I have no idea what it is called, but the feature that when you sign in, if you were reading a thread before, and there were 4 pages when you stopped reading, and now 8 pages when you signed back in, it remembers where you were and places you at that point in the thread. Does that make sense.
So if I stopped reading a thread on page 3 post 6, and then came back hours, days later, it would automatically pick up where I left off. Other forums have it, and I just have no clue what it is. Sorry.
But that would be great. If it is a feature somewhere already, I would love to know how to utilize it!

Just wanted to clarify on the potential permanent OT forum concept that that would only be an option for Premium members. We could also do something like having it open every weekend for Premium members…to keep things reined in on some of the more contentious topics!

Then we could open it to the full community for holidays, etc. as we do now.

Just wanted to be sure that was clear.

Also, there are a bunch of “plug-ins” for the forums software (written by random folk) to implement features that are not part of the standard-issue software. I’m not sure of the scope of those offerings and if/how much of that type of programming the developers would like to incorporate, which is part of the reason why we don’t want to limit the brainstorming right now. Also, we might not be able to satify a request for X, but it could lead to an idea for Y that we can do.

Thanks again~
Mod 1