Free lease gone bad

Well if the names match could that be something? I’m not saying it would be the end all and be all but maybe additional proof.

Assuming she used her real name when making the account.

1 Like

Rockinhorse- I think that will be for the courts/LE to decide, if it was valid.

As far as how long a warrant would take, I am waiting to see if that’s the course LEs decide to take. I would think stolen tack, as someone mentioned earlier, may be a higher value than a 21 year old lesson pony, monetarily.

@Callista17 how long in situations like this would you expect a warrant to process?

I don’t think it’s the barn owner that’s being “dramatic”. :lol: Has she posted in all caps?

19 Likes

@ Gestalt- LOL hehe

3 Likes

The trainer made no attempt to collect board for 8 years because she believed that she owned the pony.

OP and trainer have falling out, OP tells trainer neener-neener, I didn’t give you the pony.

Trainer says ok then, if she’s your pony, pay me board for the last 8 years. I’ll deduct for the lessons she did.

OP makes no attempt to do so

Trainer obtains legal ownership of pony.

OP steals pony.

Trainer contacts LE. The “Case of the Stolen Pony” is now a criminal matter.

Trainer continues to look for pony, posting on Facebook.

And we wait to see if another chapter is forthcoming.

I could be wrong, I’ve been wrong before, but that’s how I’m reading it. I really do not see any issue with someone not attempting to collect board on a pony they clearly believe, and may have documentation to prove, belongs to them.

19 Likes

I’m betting the OP did give BO the pony after she couldn’t make the reduced board payments. OP also seemed to be behind on board for the other four horses. I hope the pony is found soon and in good health.

13 Likes

#freethepony ??

6 Likes

Well, here’s a question for you all - is ownership still 90% possession (or however it was worded)?

But again, how are you (g) going to prove it’s the same person?

This expression comes from property law (as in real estate). Not applicable.

Here we we have a question of the intent of the parties 8+ years ago. And then even if that gets decided in the OP’s favor, we have an issue of whether there was a boarding contract, what that said, and whether BO has now taken appropriate steps under local law to obtain ownership of the horse. The only way possession comes into play is whether that shows the intent of the parties over the 8 years (in the face of no written contract), or whether BO had sufficient grounds for the lien.

4 Likes

Accurate

6 Likes

Geesh!! The BO is the legal owner without question!

1 Like

Late to the party.

  1. So you signed the agreement and didn’t make sure the other party did? For 8.5 years? Why bother to create that document at all if you don’t plan to have the other side sign it?

  2. That said, I don’t think your trainer has a leg to stand on. If there was a document that you can prove was shared with him/her then… and both of you guys carried on as though its terms were guiding your relationship for 8.5 years, I don’t think any court is going to agree that you dumped your horse there 8.5 years ago and have been ripping off the trainer (without a peep from him/her) for all that time.

2 Likes

MVP, Late to the party and you need to read the back a few pages. Turns out the OP was a wee bit untruthful in her initial post. I don’t think you would be answering this way if you have caught the update.

12 Likes

…were we ghosted?..

Well the OP is still reading.

I doubt the owner/trainer wants to update she is perusing the OP criminally. I hope the owner/trainer gets the pony she has cared for for the past decade back.

8 Likes

@Tbfan03 - comment?

1 Like