Oy, vey… going through this right now as a boarder, and I have been on the other side of the business as well. Also, I will again switch from HO to BO when my place gets built.
Full care means the owner could go on walk about for an extended period of time and the horse would be OK. It would not be improved or exercised (beyond turnout**), but its needs would be met.
That said, I have some differences (to be put into a contract and my discussions of terms with a prospective boarder (or that I have with a BO when I’m the HO):
-
Turn out means enough exercise for the horse, accomplished as that facility can. If you have a barn or weather that means horses have to be in stalls for more than 24 hours straight, you have to figure out how to give the horses some free time out somewhere-- in the one paddock or in the indoor or whatever. Build accordingly if you can!
-
Feeding horses has gotten complicated and a matter of a many and strong opinions. I want to stay out of that maelstrom, so that means the HO should buy what they want fed and put their supplements into one container to be dumped. That said, if the area requires beet pulp that has to be soaked, that will be included in the price of board and soaked appropriately. If boarder doesn’t want that fed, they can refuse it, but get no discount. Enough hay and the kind required to keep the horse in good weight is included in board. There is no nickel-and-diming on either side for basic forage or feed needed to keep the horse healthy.
-
Barn does worming, fecal testing and vaccines/Coggins unless the boarder wants to do their own vet work. In that case, they have to present proof of that within a couple of weeks of the rest of the barn being done. The idea is that the all horses on the farm are managed as a herd and, IMO, every HO benefits from knowing how their horses’ spit-brothers/sisters are also as “clean” as theirs is. Not a fan of horses living together where the BO throws up their hands and lets every boarder do this stuff their own way… or not at all. It’s not fair to the person who is rigorous about it; it’s also not fair to the person who never takes their horse to a show and poses no to the closed herd on the farm.
-
Owner should contract for their own additional vet work and shoeing. They should be there for those appointments as a matter of saving BO labor costs and also good horsemanship. But something else can be negotiated so long as the absentee ownership style doesn’t create a problem.
-
Treatments for medical stuff to be negotiated.
-
Blanketing and fly spray/wardrobe is included in board, but owners have to keep those things supplied.
-
Supervision! Supervision is important, people. Nothing chaps my HO hide more than to show up and see a rubbed tail or cut that the BO missed. To me, that means they aren’t noticing the stuff that I, when I work on their side of the table, would notice. Sometimes, if they are that careless with their own horses, you have to know that and accept that that’s the level of care your horse will get, too, and that it’s not personal.
My bottom line, no matter which side of the biz I am on, is that the horse’s basic needs will be met and no one gets exploited. But training, improvement even any kind of horse enrichment beyond basic turnout is on the owner. As a BO, I’d prefer that the HO not be absentee since I think horses are optional, luxury beasts so people who have them at all should really do right by them and stay invested in them. Alternately, I’d be cool with a retired horse and the HO who was way out of the picture so long as our standards of care and horsemanship were in line and I could set things up to keep that horse happy.
But, in answer to the OP’s question: If there is some aspect of horse care not being done such that you couldn’t leave for 2 months, it’s not Full Care.