I am by nature an iconoclast.
I have come to believe that the vast majority of people simply accept the majority opinion without any analysis of the roots of the opinions. They are infinitely persuadable by well targeted propaganda that is widely spread, especially if 1) the people pushing a particular viewpoint have a personal interest in it–financial, power, self-protection, group advantage, career advantage; or 2) if the propaganda is a simple and easy appeal to primal emotions. The current term for this seems to be sheeple, and sheeple can very easily become mobs with all that mob implies. There are too many instances of this happening today.
I have and do not ever trust the positions that are the most popular and accepted. Just as an example, take my position on slavery. How many of the people who are disgusted by it read the WPA interviews of former slaves; how many of them have bothered to investigate the history of slavery worldwide; how many of them have investigated slavery in the modern world? How many of them understand that abolitionists before the Civil War made use of propaganda techniques? How many of them understand that anti-slavery in the nineteenth century West was premised on Christian beliefs and was not a worldwide phenomenon? Very few people are willing to challenge the “accepted wisdom” on slavery, and those that do are vilified. Human slavery is not a simple issue; if it were, it would not have persisted in human history until 150 years ago throughout the majority of the world.
When I was doing history, my first instinct was not to trust historians but to go to the source records themselves.
I will always challenge “accepted wisdom” because I will never trust it. It’s too easy to simply accept what well run PR campaigns push. I will always try to do my own independent investigation to find nuance. If something is too simple, then it’s likely someone’s propaganda. Always look for the roots and for who will benefit.
Safe Sport is the result of a horrific wrong, but like many human responses to horrific wrongs, it is the easy way out. It lacks nuance.
I also believe that human culture carries with it a huge inertia and that revolutions do not last. I believe that the vast majority of humans are deeply averse to fundamental change, and that cultural inertia will overcome revolution. My time scale is very, very long, and I believe in the pendulum. What comes will go. That which is worth saving because it is fundamentally in accord with human biology and human psychology will persist.
I will always challenge the basis of belief.