I’m wondering if Practical Horseman’s decision to replace George in their monthly critique column and George’s absence from that big invitational clinic (sorry not a H/J person) had anything to do with TPTB’s knowledge that this was coming. Just a question, not an assumption
Not necessarily. Part of it may have been he was getting older, and after a certain point, it’s nice to have a new perspective on the column format.
But as others have remarked, the fact that his column had a reputation for being overly fixated on riders’ appearance (weight, turnout, and tack) had been criticized, and with the Internet, such criticism of his comments were more easily disseminated. Before, during the magazine era (which I remember), people would just have to grouse in private, or, more likely, worry they were being too easily offended by GM without feedback to the contrary.
The Internet has certainly made many terrible things possible, but I do have to say it has enabled lots of people to gather together about this issue and realize they weren’t the only people concerned. If I was only exposed to the opinions of people at my barn, I wouldn’t realize that my own sentiments were more commonly shared in the horse community.
Yeah, I’ve been posting on the Facebook page (Elizabeth Goldsmith) and getting some flack from the ISWG crowd. It seems particularly difficult for some people to wrap their minds around the idea that someone can have done positive things for the sport but also molested children.
Thank you for pointing out what needs to be said! Among everything else you said, it’s also horribly insulting to homosexuals and perpetuates backasswards Neanderthal stereotypes of pedophilia as a “gay thing”.
I started reading Unrelenting, because I was curious, and wanted to get some insight. In one part of the book I believe GM was about 16 or 17, he writes …
“My close friend & mentor Victor Hugo-Vidal and I were marooned in a motel for three days waiting out the storm. It wasn’t just that Victor influenced me intellectually and in my riding~he also influenced some of my early forays into experimenting with my attraction to other guys.”
I reread this a few times. Just the mention of motel, 3 days & experimentation… very creepy.
perhaps this is a cycle from victim to victim. GM as a young teen was alone traveling & vulnerable himself.
Thank goodness for safe sport & the victim shaming on fb is discussing.
I’ll say one thing for sure. At least one of the loudest and most idiotic women posting on there has a husband who would have his ass in a sling if he got reported.
Hopefully someone will report him then… The rot needs to go.
I do want to say that Victor and George were peers and friends. That isn’t victimization in my mind.
I knew I shouldn’t have looked at the Chronicle FB article. Some of the comments are pretty sickening. However, I did get one giggle out of it. Someone was protesting that we only had one part of the story. “no one has heard George’s side!” I kind of thought that would be somewhere in the 500 or so pages of Unrelenting.
Thanks for mentioning this! I’m following now.
To me the creepiest thing is when he talks about having a younger boyfriend from another culture and mentions that in that country (might have been Brazil), it was common for an older man to have a younger boyfriend and mentor him. I don’t remember the exact words, but since I read Unrelenting after the initial accusation, that really jumped out at me.
Yes the homophobia in the comments is very disturbing and also very, very sad for a sport with so many young LGBT people to see the elder athletes talk like this about them. On the good side people put their real names so now we all know who they are. If you are a young person, know most people do NOT think that! It is a warped mindset.
Also the attitude that young people should just get over what ever older people choose to do to them I think is from the medieval age, not from the 1970s as the commentators claim. I read today that the average age for someone to tell on their childhood abuse is 54 years of age. I did not know that but I understand. As you get older you care less what others think and you reflect on your life more, you remember things that happened long ago and you consider them more important again.
In other news, I think USEF CEO Bill Moroney’s statement in yesterday’s COTH article, “Yesterday’s ruling is the result of the Center’s process, and we respect their decision," is also pretty bad. The support sounds curt and grudging. Even one more sentence like “The USEF supports efforts to make our sport safe”-- a sort of boiler-plate, bland gesture of support of the broad mission of SafeSport–would have served the organization better.
I mean, c’mon people: We are at that moment in history where we have decided to publicly take a stand against pedophilia and the conventions and institutions (looking at you, Catholic Church) that allow the sexual abuse of children to go on. Is it not really, super clear which side of that change you want to publicly ally yourself with? And what it would have taken, rhetorically, for the USEF to show the public where it stood was really minor. Yet it was not there. And that, apparently, is why we need SafeSport: because this governing body won’t do anything to even attempt to protect its most vulnerable members from exploitation while part of a sport it oversees.
For other readers following along on this tangent, charlieTBD is rolling his eyes at another post by Carolinadreamin’ that I can’t quote, “Prince Andrew comes to mind.”
Ok, now that y’all are caught up:
Hold up a sec, charlieTBD. To be fair, the Prince Andrew thing was in response to my asking if Europeans had the kind of excessive hero-worship that the American H/J industry has for Morris (at least), and that’s where someone offered Prince Andrew as an example. So that remark had a basis; it was not gratuitous mud-slinging.
And if you think the British Royal Family is less of an industry and institution than the American Hunter/Jumper industry, I don’t know that to tell you. I think Prince Andrew arguably enjoys at least the same level of impunity and untouchability as Morris.
So, contrary to your opinion, I think Morris and Prince Andrew are, in fact, “comparable” in ways that matter. You claim they are incomparable. I think you will have t defend that claim in order for it to stick and your outrage at the suggestion that there’s any similar kind of cultural rot in Europe does not exist.
And all of that victim blaming keeps demonstrating how much we need SafeSport. Clearly, the sport cannot police itself and those with the least power (victims of sexual abuse who are quite cognizant that they are upsetting a very powerful apple cart), get verbally abused by those with the most power. When, on the other hand, Joe Q. Member takes the side of the kid who says something hinky happened and takes steps to figure that out and Stop It, we won’t need SafeSport anymore. Until then…
Does that mean that you know of a man who is molesting a minor? if so, you have an obligation to report it.
The USEF’s statement was just what I would expect…this is a systemic problem in EVERY part of our industry. USEF is just another example. USEF’s statement, horse show management (TIEC’s statement saying they were standing with GM by leaving his name up until after the appeal),the sponsors (a big horse clothing company told me they were standing with TIEC with their decision to support GM until after the appeal , their response to me a week after I emailed them and Tryon had already taken the name down because ,I think, a bigger sponsor called, was they were “inline” with TIEC and wanted to wait until after the appeal.), the judges, the trainers , the riders, the grooms, the parents…anyone involved in the industry for any amount of time knows this. This is the time to draw that line in the sand and say NO MORE!! Mr Kessler, you owe us more, if you can’t support the members and SafeSport, step aside !
And I will say it again… the victim’s statements about this case should inspire anyone who struggles with life… even the most broken can be healed, and that is a beautiful thing.
I would remind you that the statute isn’t solely applied to minors.
Unless I missed something, Kristin Medall Simpson-Ferguson Hardin’s involvement in this story was 1.) to post publicly that she and family members had been threatened about speaking out 2.) later took down the public post.
I also think (I haven’t researched) that she posted publicly in support of Hilary Ridland during the aftermath of the Rob Gage investigation.
Does that mean that you know of a man who is molesting a minor? if so, you have an obligation to report it.
Knowing something does not mean that you have enough proof to report it. There’s a fine line between gossip without proof and real hard knowledge. Child molesters don’t generally do it in public.