George Morris on the SS list

The Athletes For Equity group is applying for 501 c 6 not for profit status. It’s not going to become another layer of bureaucracy or a committee or part of Safe Sport itself.

Its apparently focused on lobbying efforts and raising money for legal expenses… and pr… and “education”

Here is a basic definition of what a 501 c 6 org is…

“A 501 C (6) organization is tax speak for a business association such as a chamber of commerce. Although they’re organized to promote business, they don’t generate a profit and don’t pay shares or dividends. That qualifies them as non-profit organizations, exempt from paying income tax.”

Oh boy. They have a lot of nerve calling themselves “Athletes for Equity”. The people jumping on this bandwagon should really take a hard look at the image they are portraying all over social media. From an outsider looking in, they appear very ignorant, and quite frankly, pretty awful.

18 Likes

She has little choice. She’s hitched her wagon to GM’s star so tight and for so many years, without his clinics to host, she has little method in which to keep up her manner of living. You can only be asked to judge so many horse shows.

Ps. GM’s Thanksgiving weekend clinic, which ran for decades, is quietly NOT being held.

25 Likes

That is how you build a nonprofit, you incorporate first and then get your nonprofit status around a year later plus or minus some months.

In case anyone is confused, donations to a 501©(6) are not tax deductible. FWIW these organizations can be a little tricky to run because you don’t get to fundraise any way you like and then take all income as tax free. “Unrelated Business Income” is a surprisingly tricky bit of tax law.

That said, the separate entity does allow them to take money without any individual having to be liable for it or the taxes on it, and that’s important.

Note most of the budget is going for lawyers.

4 Likes

I rode at two places that had a Hitchcock pen, and you’d better believe we had to do the reinless exercise; also, stirrupless and taking off a jacket while going down the pen. Nothing wrong with crest release per se, and yes, GM did lament that people weren’t moving on from it. BUT. Why is/are the winner(s) of the top equitation competitions WINNING with it. You see automatic releases in pictures of days past with MacClay winners, e.g. Mary Mairs (Chapot). And if the response is that the judge(s) can only judge what is presented, I am sure that if they insisted that the big winner needed to be able to ride with an automatic release, these kids would do it. I don’t thin there’s any lack of talent there, just a lack of will on the part of judges and trainers to enforce the standard when someone is supposed to be “the best.”

8 Likes

If you Google image the top Grand Prix riders of today, greater than 90% of the jumping photos show them using the crest release. Maybe the automatic release isn’t the “all that” that some here on this forum think it is.

Additionally, what some people here think is an automatic release is really no such thing. It’s not just a straight line from bit to elbow (shown only from one side - lots of times if you look you can see the other hand right there on the crest) captured in one millisecond of time in a photo posted to the internet with a ton of comments from the masses oohing and ahhing about the wonderful days of automatic release yore.

11 Likes

There’s a big difference between jumping a 3’6" Eq round where you’re supposed to be demonstrating excellence in style and jumping a 1,5m round where you’re supposed to do basically anything you can to get over the jumps in the time allowed. You can see all kinds of position weirdness (not all of it helpful to the horse, either) in the GP classes. The Eq classes are supposed to be showing that you have the foundation to go on to big fences.

I can tell you that there was no opposite “hand right there on the crest” when I was taught to do an auto release. You jumped without reins until your position was strong enough that you could have both hands independent of the neck.

10 Likes

The crest release is a tool like anything else. Is it a stepping stone to learn the auto release? Yes. That doesn’t preclude its use depending on the circumstances.

Those who think this is remotely relevant to GHM being banned please take it to another thread. You’re missing his point as much as the people who ONLY use the crest release.

4 Likes

That Athletes for Equity site says they are citizens across all sports, but is anyone on their, uh, board (?) anything other than an equestrian?

5 Likes

Not entirely irrelevant as I think you can find Morris having written about lamenting his role in popularizing it.

2 Likes

“She has little choice. She’s hitched her wagon to GM’s star so tight and for so many years, without his clinics to host, she has little method in which to keep up her manner of living. You can only be asked to judge so many horse shows.

Ps. GM’s Thanksgiving weekend clinic, which ran for decades, is quietly NOT being held.”

I’m sure GM has made her a ton of money. I don’t remember that being a cheap clinic even to audit. I usually was working & never made it to one. That & it was probably a 2 hour drive at least.

The man is 81 & wouldn’t be teaching forever. You can’t let that be your main source of income. I really think the ISWG crowd thought he was going to win his appeal. I’m glad the clinic was canceled. I would have expected her to lose her judges card for hosting it. For as many people that say they would continue to ride with him, I think it would be a hard sell right now.

11 Likes

What does a crest release on a horse have to do with sexual assault of a minor?

11 Likes

YES, it did happen once. And it was found out and the person was exonerated. Still worth the risk in my opinion.

3 Likes

I often wonder if some of the people who frequent internet forums don’t have real life groups of friends with whom they socialize, so they don’t realize that normal conversations frequently go off on tangents with some or all members of the group, then come back to the original topic, and veer off on tangents again, and no one ever seems to get lost, confused, or annoyed. At least that’s how it has always worked in my experience, in real life AND in forum discussions.

I mean obvs, cause there’s that one anonymous testimonial on the new antis page.

Honestly when I read that I thought it was an incoherent rambling of Serio’s case with changes to convince the public at large it is referring to a different case.

People suck and the complainers are screwing everyone because they are why we need these rules.

18 Likes

George Morris is the common denominator.

1 Like

What’s a Hitchcock pen, please?

Sorry for the tangent, y’all.

Damn, I feel old.
It’s a circular or oval jump chute.
Highish outside wall, loer inside, with about a 10’ track and adjustable jumps.
You can send a horse through with or without a rider.

8 Likes

Nice. I think I have seen one of those, but never been on a farm that had one. That would be cool!