[QUOTE=Palm Beach;8847867]
I don’t really agree with your method, if I understand it correctly. You are using separation anxiety to get the horse to choose between being left behind and crossing the water? I’ve seen horses pitch fits when left behind, and would not recommend this for anyone who is not a very experienced rider.
I would recommend methodically teaching Go Forward in the ring, and with OP’s horse this would not take long at all. Then I would have the horse cross a tarp, bridge, any variety of footing type obstacles that the OP has access to in a safe, secure place like an arena.
When a horse has a lack of confidence or anxiety, I don’t use a strong cue for go forward. The horse understands what it means, and I don’t want to increase the energy level and put too much pressure on the horse. So when working on a horse that has water issues, I’ll just present the horse to the water and bump my legs hard enough that it’s clear I want the horse to go forward, but not so hard that I will tire if the horse needs to think a minute. The instant the horse takes a step forward, or even shifts its weight forward, I stop bumping and praise lightly. Then resume bumping until I get another forward response. This normally results in a fairly quick understanding without getting an unwanted response like a huge leap into the water, or a dash across the water. I want calm forward steps into the water. And I don’t mind if the horse needs to stop and sniff while crossing.
I prefer this method because the horse stays calm. Some stream crossings have tough entrances, and a horse that wheels or backs up may get into a bad situation. So it works in all places, and the horse does not respond in a manner that would challenge a less experienced rider.[/QUOTE]
See, that’s different than what you said above, which is that the horse was being disrespectful by not having a ‘Go’ button.
No amount of teaching “go forward” in the ring is going to get a horse to be able to see the bottom of a water crossing and understand implicitly that they are not going to get hurt. That’s something you have to teach them by getting them through water.
My method is “I wouldn’t ask you to do something that would kill you”. You shouldn’t present a horse to water and then have an argument about it on the banks - IME that is even worse because when you kick or as you say, “gently tap” the horse to go forward, their first instinct is going to be to balk - on a bank, that can be slippery and dangerous.
it’s the whole "The Method Of Extraction Can Be More Painful Than The Extraction’ theory. The method: getting them into the water. The extraction: the water - it’s not the water that causes issues once they’re in - it’s how you set them up to enter the water. You set them up for success and you don’t present them with a situation they can fail in. You don’t give them the option to fail. That’s why hosing their legs off pre-puddle and/or and setting them up with a more experienced horse to follow works.
That first step into the water needs to be of their own volition, because they want to, not because they want to get away from you kicking them.
I’ve seen trainers and amateurs alike permanently ruin horses for eventing careers by believing what you believe, that it is a lack of respect or “Go” - IME that is setting up for an argument right in front of the base of the water. They kick, kick, kick, kick them and the horse learns to associate the water with an altercation/disagreement, unpleasantness and anxiousness. If they took the time to let the horse figure it out themselves, it would be a different story.
Again, with young/green horses and water - it is not a “go forward” problem - it’s a “I can’t see the bottom of that and I don’t know what it is” problem. Teach them it’s okay to listen to you and it won’t be a problem.