[QUOTE=REH;7677610]
When I was a kid, back when dinosaurs roamed the earth, I never heard talk of disparity of what was legal/illegal between the hunters and the jumpers other than protective leg wear for horses. Boy am I glad to not be a junior these days. One piece of modernized tack is fine, another is not. Wouldn’t it be nice if the classes came down to who road the best and not policing tack or fashion.
(hands off my royal riders)[/QUOTE]
As a judge myself, please understand that the rule regarding black stirrup irons in equitation classes has NOTHING to do with what is fashionable or “big brother” just coming up with their own rules.
When sitting in the judge’s booth at the other side of the ring, if a rider was to loose their stirrup on course, it can be virtually impossible to tell when black stirrup irons are being used, as it blends in instantly with the boot. Loosing a stirrup on course during an eq class would be a big faux pas (unless specifically asked for), so the new rule regarding black stirrup irons is to allow the official to properly judge the class.
Like you, I also grew up riding during the dinosaur era and we didn’t have things like hot pink show shirts and helmets full of gaudy blinged out Swarovski crystals. Unfortunately, times have changed, many fashion trends have popped up along the way and rules need to be adjusted accordingly.
Hopefully, that makes the black stirrup rule make more sense! 