http://apps.keeneland.com/sales/Nov16/pdfs/316.pdf
There are those that criticize TB breeders for throwing everything at the wall to see what sticks. That we over breed, breed mares that shouldn’t be bred based on their race record and or lack of pedigree to warrant the exercise.
By and large I don’t entirely disagree having seen and still see mares bred that make me think why would someone breed ‘this mare’ and then complain they lost money in the process.
The dam of Hansen certainly would have had my fellow agents scratching our heads if he had been offered at auction as a yearling. At the end of a sales day when a bunch of us would gather for cocktails we would ‘nominate’ hip numbers for the best Blank Page award, aka The WTF were they thinking award.
Certainly Hansen’s dam would have qualified and most likely would have won that sales day Blank Page award. Tapit’s fee when bred was a reasonable $12,500. But considering Stormy Sunday was maybe worth $1,000 as a broodmare if a buyer could have been found. It is safe to say that she certainly didn’t justify a $12,500 stud fee.
The rule of thumb for many years when deciding on how much of a stud fee a breeder should invest, was the mare should be worth 5 times the stud fee. That went out the window in the late 70s early 80s when the “commercial” yearling market took off.
It will be interesting to see in years to come if Stormy Sunday’s pedigree blossoms. Or she and Hansen was were just a fluke, a one off, an exception to the rule.