[QUOTE=jackandlily;8957895]
Sorry, did not realize it the site was subscription-only. The short story is that this decision was rampant with corruption and bribery, is not in the interests of the territory, and blatantly disregards the welfare of the animals. St. Thomas is steep and rocky, and the land here is expensive; youâd be hard-pressed to find a piece of land here over 1.5 acres, forget about it being flat. We have no large animal vet and one farrier. When the horses canât run anymore, theyâre tied up on the side of the road and left to die. On St. Thomas, there is 1 rescue which is completely stretched to their limits.
When I lived near a low-end track, I was a CANTER volunteer. I fully support racing when it is regulated and the horses are cared for, but that is not the situation here. I understand the world canât always be sunshine and rainbows, but if it prevents even one horse from ending his career in the USVI it will be a win in my book.[/QUOTE]
When I first read about this in the industry âtradesâ and industry that has seemed to embrace it. The first thing that came to mind was the welfare of the horses, racing and after retirement. ESPECIALLY after retirement.
It is difficult and expensive to re-home most of the horses retiring here. Absurd to think it will be easy to even find a few of them good homes on an Island, any Island. Let alone one the size of VI. Forking absurd.
IMO the industry should not be âembracingâ this new avenue to dump low level horses in without a through review of their aftercare program.
The industry by and large has come along way in the last 5-10 years addressing after care of retired racehorses. But a lot of the times it comes off to me more as window dressing considering the ânamesâ and their lack of expertise that are put in positions of âpowerâ and the use of funding.
I thought it was a bit absurd that New Vocations at Mereworth farm felt they needed to raise and spend over $2,000,000 to build new fancy infrastructure after Susan Salmon Donaldson left the property upon her death to be used for horse and animal protection. A VERY valuable property.
I knew Susan quite well and her father. She was my neighbor when I lived in downtown Lexington. She was a wealthy woman but you would never know it. I know for fact she would not have approved of this extravagant spending of capital. Instead of being used to better fore-fill the greater good, the main mission of her very generous gift.