[QUOTE=charismaryllis;6609579]
disclaimers: not a doctor, don’t know anything about films, but can i just say that i think it’s absolutely [edit] OUTRAGEOUS that YOU, the patient, are having to chase this down??:mad::mad:
but yeah, if your doctor won’t get you in soon, then find another doctor. i mean, this is your spine not your pinky finger or something. :mad:
-rant over-[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately, it can take several days to for a referring doctor (the one who sees the patient) to receive and review reports and images from the radiologist who is providing the image interpretation. They often work for different entities, but even where both physicians are members of the same group or employed by a hospital, the communications mechanisms can mean delays of a day or two.
That said, if there is a significant finding on the X-rays (or MRI, CT, etc) the normal protocol is for the radiologist to not only provide a report, but to pick up a phone and speak to the referring physician (or a member of that doctor’s staff) to communicate that information so the patient’s situation can be addressed right away.
Put another way, if the radiologist saw something really concerning on your film, he’d almost certainly have called your doctor, who would arrange to see you quite quickly.
Of course, sometimes things do slip through the cracks, unfortunately. It is unusual, but it does happen; medicine is practiced by humans, who occasionally make mistakes. Sometimes systems break down; files get lost in transmission, faxes don’t work, etc. So it is always a good idea to request a copy of your medical records anytime you have an exam or procedure that is more than the typical wellness scenario. By law, physicians and hospitals MUST provide you with that information; normally a simple request to “Medical Records” is sufficient. There may be a nominal charge for copies. If you have any sort of imaging done, you can also ask for a copy of the films on disc, but be aware that the viewers which are typically automatically included to allow the image to be opened and viewed will often not provide the same image quality as that viewed by the radiologist, who will have a diagnostic (2-3MP greyscale or better) monitor, and who will view an uncompressed (read: VERY large) file on their clinical workstation.