I’m reading a book by Alexander Mackay-Smith (former editor of COTH) called “Speed and the Thoroughbred: The Complete History,” and something he wrote isn’t computing, for me.
In at least three places in the book, he wrote variations on the same thing, and I quote: “Finally, there is the tail male line of the Darley Arabian 1704, the only such line of racing Arabians which survives unbroken since the eighteenth century” (p. 164). And, on p. 173, “Of all the tail male lines, only one racing line survives unbroken, that of the Darley Arabian.” For some reason, he feels that the Byerly Turk tail male line ended with The Tetrarch, and that the Godolphin Arabian’s tail male line ended with West Australian (1850): “…the length of the tail male line of the Godolphin Arabian 1730 was even shorter. The last top-class sire in this line was West Australian 1850…none of West Australian’s sons were able to reproduce their sire’s record at stud” (p. 165)
Correct me if I’m wrong, but as far as I know, there’s a small but thriving Godolphin Arabian male line, and a tiny but extant Byerly Turk line, yes?