Agree. 100%.
For those who see value in labeling, have at it. But doing so is a crutch and has become a way to avoid accountability and responsibility for conduct. As a society we need to turn away from psycho-babble crap labels / excuses that merely enable every form of deviant behavior. We need to stand up for common sense, and say with a strong clear collective voice: “This is WRONG, we will not tolerate it, and WE WILL HOLD YOU ACCOUNTABLE.”
[QUOTE=Anne FS;8373443]
No. Not buying it.
That’s like the old murder defense: to kill unless it’s in self defense, who would do that? You’d have to be crazy to kill. Therefore by definition of the act you committed you had a mental illness. Therefore murderers should not be punished but treated.
Anne Goland Shumate is like Michael Vick: knows exactly what she’s doing, knows that it is cruel, knows that what she’s doing is directly causing pain and suffering to animals who are entirely dependent on her, and knows also that what she’s doing is against the law, and DOES IT ALL ANYWAY.
She did not accumulate animals just to starve them. On the contrary, she had a plan. She accumulated animals in order to collect money from people who supported her rescue so she could specifically use that money for another purpose. It’s a perfectly logical scam: “I’ll find a way to get a lot of money free. Brilliant!”
Do you think Bernie Madoff is mentally ill? Nope, he’s a lying, cheating schemer. So is Anne Goland Shumate.[/QUOTE]