Horse pulls down and dolphin-hops after jumps... HELP before I break my neck!

I mean, short stirrup hunters and performance hunters are “the same”, but they are also not. Why people want to continue to argue that hunters/jumpers do not/cannot truly do dressage is beyond me. They should be able to do whatever dressage they are capable of AND jump jumps.

I will say that I was pretty pleased when the Grand Prix clinician told me my horse could absolutely be an upper level dressage competition horse. That’s not my ambition for him, but it was nice to hear that he has the talent for some of the more precise requirements of upper level dressage.

6 Likes

Again, you are arguing about the upper levels of dressage. The rest of us are talking about the lower levels.

7 Likes

Some hunter barns even do ask for more than just the basics of dressage! I briefly boarded at a competitive barn that did both hunters and jumpers so I was pleasantly surprised to see how advanced the dressage was in lessons even though it wasn’t the true focus. Many of these riders were able to ask the horses to truly sit and collect as well as extend correctly in their lessons over fences, really nice to see.

7 Likes

I once overheard an UL eventer tell her student, “You can fudge the half halt at the letter, but you HAVE to get it for the jump. So get it letter-perfect on the flat.”

Made sense to me.

20 Likes

I will never get this whole idea that is out there that hunter/jumper riders are seemingly incapable of “dressage” - I mean, hunters, by nature are relaxed and rhythmical, which, last I checked are the fundamentals of the dressage training scale. In fact, I would reckon there are lot more hunters further ahead in this areas than a lot of “dressage” horses.

Who are all these hunter jumper riders that can seemingly manage to hold a near perfect canter rhythm and find 8 perfect jumps that are completely incapable of grasping the concepts of the basic elements of dressage.

Anyways, carry on :).

8 Likes

Isn’t this all semantics? Some people draw a distinction between flatwork and dressage, with the latter being limited to riding in a long flapped saddle with letters on the wall. Other people lump that all in as “dressage.”

I’m pretty sure that any decent hunter-jumper barn does a great deal of “dressage” in the all-inclusive broader sense. They just don’t call it that.

12 Likes

I tend to agree - that, coupled with that occasional snooty gate-keeper who pounces on someone for suggesting their hunter was doing dressage with “BuT tHaT’s NoT rEaL dReSsAgE” leaves many (including myself) pretty gun-shy of calling it that IME.

10 Likes

Well that’s it really. Some do better "dressage’’ than others and I’m sure the jumps match that to a degree. What confuses me is the pearl-clutching at the mention of doing some dressage. Even dedicated dressage horses and riders had to start somewhere. It’s all just a spectrum!

3 Likes

Hmm, good point. I’m lucky not to be surrounded by those types so I honestly hadn’t considered that a reason that h/j people would shy away from calling our flatwork “dressage”. My assessment of those snooty gate-keeper types:

  1. THEY don’t know what real dressage is, nor it’s purpose.
  2. They probably have a lot of bling. Fancy browbands are the badge for those types.
  3. They bought a pretty made horse to do “real dressage on”
  4. They don’t truly understand the mechanics of how a horse moves and powers itself.
  5. Their opinion isn’t worth much.
4 Likes

Yeah, gatekeeping is a silly thing to do, generally motivated by hubris or insecurity, or maybe both. In any case, the only thing it’s good at doing is alienating people who might otherwise want to learn and really contribute to a community.

That being said, I hate confrontation and try to choose my battles wisely. I will happily only claim to only know/do “mere flatwork” if it will avoid me a dumb argument with someone who just wants to feel “better than” rather than have an actual, constructive discussion. It’s no skin off my back if they want to think they’re better than me :woman_shrugging:

5 Likes

I’m not talking about any levels here, but everyday riding. It’s basic physics - siting the trot will help you feel your horse better.

Meredith Michaels Beerbaum begs to differ in her explanational videos (sorry can’t link as subscibtion required). Basically she stresses out the point that she always lenghtenes her stirrups for the flatwork.

Apologies. In equestrian sense, it defines the rider’s leg in constant connection to the horse’s body (basically inner side from hips to ankles). And BTW I fully agree with what you say,but instead or the term “German” dressage, I’ll just use “classical” dressage. :wink:

I fully agree with all you said in your post :+1: I’d like to add that in classical dressage the cue should always come from the outside leg; never do any horse bending, rain shifting or seat tilting!

1 Like

I’ve always wondered about this. I know many people lengthen their stirrups for their flatwork, but that always feels a bit counterintuitive to me. Presumably we want to do dressage with hunters/jumpers not only to strengthen and supple them, but to also help improve adjustability (among other things) between the fences. If that’s the case, wouldn’t you want to ride your flatwork how you ride your jumps? We all know those horses who do well with riders with a longer/shorter leg because that was how they were trained and where they’re expecting their cues, so it just seems unfair to change our leg position and expect the horse to just magically carry everything over from flatwork days and have it click over fences.

Practice how you perform and all…

2 Likes

I ride Forward Seat. During my very brief stint (3 months) as a student at a residential Forward Seat school we were expected to be able to do the three speeds of all gaits, we were expected to be able to bring our horses back gently (no jerking of reins, no sawing of the bit), we were expected to do turns properly, we approached all jumps with impulse while under control, etc., etc., etc… If we did not do it to the standards of our teacher (Kay Russell) you can be sure that we heard about it immediately and she was not into saving our egos. I think my ears got blistered a few times while I was there.

The French word dressage is supposed to mean training–any type of training that improves the horse as a riding horse. Forward Seat does NOT use classical dressage collection.

My first horse, Hat Tricks, was not getting worked since I had two other horses I was training. A dressage rider who needed a confidence builder leased him (she had been taking dressage lessons for years, statewide reserve champion, then her horse traumatized her for some reason). She brought out the barn owner/hunt seat teacher AND her dressage teacher from where she boarded to check him out.

Neither of them could believe how responsive Hat Tricks was. The barn owner’s comment was “you ask him to do something and he just does it!” Her dressage teacher’s comment after riding him was “buy him.” Hat Tricks had never had any dressage training, he had never been used in a dressage lesson, I had trained and ridden him Forward Seat ONLY. But those dressage ladies really liked him, his responsiveness, how he could alter his stride, how he could rate his impulsion, and his cheerful OBEDIENCE to the lightest aids.

Yeah, I train the horses (elderly lesson horses now), but I do not use classical dressage to train them. In spite of that the horses tend to improve with my riding to become much more pleasant riding horses. EVERY horse I ride gets schooled at the three speeds of a gait. EVERY horse I ride gets schooled to be responsive to leg and hand aids, the lighter the better. I work on honest contact, preferably light contact, I ride back to front because dang it I ride Forward Seat and we are all about riding back to front.

Dressage, as in using collection, is NOT the only way to a well trained horse. Humane training that works WITH the horse and its limitations is also a way to get a well trained horse if you know what you are doing.

8 Likes

Good for her, really. But you have missed my point entirely. No matter who lengthens their stirrups, it simply isn’t necessary for teaching the basics: straightness, rhythm, a little lateral work.

Then, of course, for every Meredith Beerbaum, there’s a Beezie Madden to prove my point.

5 Likes

It’s the biomechanics. When you have your stirrup a hole longer for the flatwork, you can feel & interact with the horse’s body better (your leg has more surfice), your knee & heels cannot go up and block your back. You want flexibility to follow/balance with the horse’s movements. At least that’s how I learn it back home.

2 Likes

Yeah your average 2’6 hunter ammy isn’t riding true upper level dressage but, not for nothing, your equivalent weekend warrior dressage rider showing training level isn’t either. The basics are very much the same at training level and first level. It’s only above that where the differences start to truly show up… and even then most hunter/jumper riders capable of higher levels of jumping would also be capable of higher level dressage if they needed to learn/do it for some reason.

9 Likes

My bad, I didn’t realize it had navicular changes. If that’s the case why are they still jumping the horse?

3 Likes

You’re not surrounded by them because they are fictional. Is there a small gaggle of 12 year old brats somewhere who said that some time to someone? Perhaps; in the cosmic sense that anyone can say anything. But dressage is really NOT a gate keeping culture and none of the dozens of trainers I know stateside or in NZ (the horse cultures I know best) would EVER look down on anyone for showing interest in dressage.

And yeah, that includes Western dressage too :+1:

7 Likes

That information was included in the opening post of this thread.

5 Likes

That’s why they do it for dressage and I understand that. But I’m asking specifically for h/j - why would you want to train your horse differently than you compete, especially if you’re anticipating all of those flatwork basics to carry over to your jumping?

If shortening my stirrups changes the way I’m capable of using my body and the way I’m able to give my aids, to the point that it truly makes a difference (which it obviously does) then it only seems intuitive that I should predominantly train and practice my flatwork using my “compromised” shorter stirrups because when I’m in a jump off, I want my horse to understand exactly what I’m asking without having to “translate” it.

Maybe if I’m working more advanced dressage specifically in an effort to build strength and coordination in my horse, as opposed to training I expect to use in the jumper ring, I could see why you’d use longer stirrups. But I’d estimate that’s not really the case for the majority of riders.

4 Likes