(Originally posted in Racing, then I moved topic to Off Course… maybe a better fit here for discussion?)
As we know, horse racing has suffered much bad/sad publicity of late- certainly some of it deserved, and perhaps some of it a pile-on of the old news adage: if it bleeds, it leads the news.
My question for much more knowledgeable folks than me is: I have always believed that horse racing to some degree subsidizes and supports non-racing equestrian sports. From agricultural/tax advantages for (all) horse breeding, to support for growing horse feed, scholarship funding for equine veterinarians and research, demand for horse equipment used on the track helping create economies of scale for all equine sports, popular race horses reminding adults and showing children how magnificent horses are…
…what is the relationship between horse racing being active and healthy, and any shadow effect that the racing business may cast upon recreational (ie, non-racing) equestrian activities?
If wagering on horse races continues to decline, and tracks and racing in general continue their downward trends, and heroic horses go uncelebrated by a cautious press (Today’s Seabiscuit, anyone? Secretariat?) what effect might those trend-lines have on the rest of the equestrian marketplace?
Does bad racing PR paint all equestrian sports with the same broad brush of perceived animal abuse? We hold our breath when the Derby is run, hoping they all get home safe- does that mindset trickle down to parents wanting their kids to play tennis (substitute cheer/sail/golf/even football…) instead of ride?
I’ve been pondering this, with an overlay today of learning that our small, insular, allegedly equestrian-centric community has 275 kids that just signed up for soccer, compared to 15 kids in our Pony Club.
Bottom line: is racing a bellwether for riding, too?