How do you evaluate foal movement?

[QUOTE=Kyzteke;5679332]
Ah – Ramzes blood! No wonder he was great. My favorite sporthorse blood ever…:wink:

And, while I don’t think anyone is arguing that “purpose-bred” horses can generally do the job better (any job), and that the rider makes the horse, the question that really came to light in this thread is: “can someone actually predict GP promise in a foal simply by evaluating gaits?”

I maintain: “not usually.”[/QUOTE]

So mom & I were chatting about this thread while we were working the younger horses this morning…so here is what we were yakking about -

Our rule of thumb is to look to both sides of the pedigree for the production of Grand Prix horses to get another generation of GP talent/mind/conformation. It can’t just be on the sire or dam’s side - both sides should bring proven Grand Prix ability & the prepotency to pass it along to the table to reliably predict it being possible in the next generation.

ML - I am not saying that other people aren’t producing the talent. We have certainly kept the ones (or at least we try to…if someone offers enough money they go - it’s a business) but we earmark at the beginning (usually by 1-3 months of age) and then nurture them. But the horses that have done best in hand are historically not GP horses. Ditto for the super stars in the lower levels (< 3rd Level). The qualities that make them shine at the easier levels do not translate into GP talent. But hey - I’d love to be wrong. :smiley: I think everyone should have the opportunity to bring a baby from the beginning - GP - it’s an amazing journey!!!

And Manni - If I’m wrong - sorry!!! Just trying to research and find info between horses!!!

My story to this topic…

Many years ago, my mother was looking for a nice dressagehorse for her. (she was riding 1st and 2nd level). We went to a breeder who showed us a 3 year old. A pretty tall chestnut with a lot of white. He moved nice, walk was a little weak (in my opininion) His breeding was Maat (Marconi…) out of a Dominikaner III mare. ( His dam belonged originally to a friend of ours who sold her after never getting a nice foal out of her…)
This breeder bought the foal from this new owner and raised him.

We kind of liked the horse and bought it. (and we payed only an average price nothing fancy)
My mother started to ride the horse but found out he was too strong for her. So I got him and rode him for some years, until 2nd level. He was quite sucessful (we won several times) so he raised the attention of a GP rider who bought him and trained and showed him to GP level.

This was a horse whose lines were nothing impressing and still he made it to GP level…

[QUOTE=Tasker;5679621]

And Manni - If I’m wrong - sorry!!! Just trying to research and find info between horses!!![/QUOTE]

No Tasker, I have to apologize for being new in this board writing horrible English and trying to prove everybody is wrong (which is really not my intention. )

But I will try to find the breeding of Rabauke. I´m sure the information is stored in the www somewhere…

This makes perfect sense, but since so very, very few mares are trained to GP, doesn’t that limit your selection down to, say…4 horses?:smiley:

Seriously, you can look at the pedigree of the mare, but even if a mare produces a GP horse in her first foal, she will still be well into her teens before you know that.

How do you approach this?

There you go – perfect sort of example.

And you are doing fine on this board – your English is better than many Americans, so not to worry.

[QUOTE=Kyzteke;5679813]
This makes perfect sense, but since so very, very few mares are trained to GP, doesn’t that limit your selection down to, say…4 horses?:smiley:

Seriously, you can look at the pedigree of the mare, but even if a mare produces a GP horse in her first foal, she will still be well into her teens before you know that.

How do you approach this?[/QUOTE]
Well, in the beginning - we didn’t breed our mares until they were in their teens and had had careers. :slight_smile: And while it ‘wasted’ years - it was the best way we had to evaluate what that generation had given us…nothing quite like 10 years at FEI to figure out what you want to tweak! :slight_smile: Our homebred stallions started breeding back in '79 and so we were generally riding full & half siblings from both sides of the pedigree for several years and honestly - there really is nothing quite like riding 3+ out of the same mareline on a daily basis. It gives you an absolute clear window into what traits come down through the generations…*see below for what I mean.

Now we generally keep 1 older model - mare/gelding/stallion - train it until age 6-8 assess potential, see what needs ‘improving’ and then cross our fingers for a full sibling filly that is breeding quality. If it’s a mare that is kept back we like to pick the better phenotype and breed her first (hopefully she is the older sibling) and the other is brought along again. If we are not satisfied with the results from the phenotype filly’s produce - then we know that she is going back in the riding pool to be sold or if she produces a knockout - she’s a career broodmare. If the produce was not what we wanted, we may opt to breed the full sister to see if she is the better producer. (whew…that was a lot of if’s)
If it’s a gelding older sibling that is retained, we go by phenotype, then he’s a window into a slightly less temperamental (no hormones) version that ‘should’ compare in the training process, so we bring him along, decide what needs improving and pick the appropriate stallion.
If it was a stallion, we generally invest the training to bring him along regardless and retain a full sister for breeding to outside stallions so as to assess what might be good bloodlines to mix in for the stallion and hopefully a future stallion prospect - by him or out of his full sister.

So since this is OT - here goes-
I am riding 3 full siblings currently
Atreo, Avebury, Alexis and then 2 half brothers that are out of that mareline Wyatt and Don Wiliam.

I rode the 3 A’s dam, her full sister and the 2 full brothers. The full sister trained up to GP between 11-13 and was the first horse I did from the absolute beginning (first rider on her back) to GP. The granddam of DW & W was my 2nd YR’s horse and a half sister to the 3 A’s dam - she was a GP horse for my sister. I rode both her daughters and their full brother. I rode the granddam’s full brother until he passed away at 16. We sold a colt out of W & DW dam’s full sister (by an R line Celle stallion). He is a lovely horse at 7 and getting ready to show 3rd level for his owner. (I can link to pedigrees or the mareline itself if that would make it easier to understand who is where…)

Every time I throw a leg over any of the horses above - I am riding the SAME horse. It might be a different color, degree of sensitivity may vary a bit, the height, slightly different shape and it may have a quirk or 2 (the Weltmeyer particularly) but believe me - it is the same(!!!) horse. Same training program to bring them along, same challenges, same solutions to advance their training and keep them happy. If I mess it up as a rider - then it’s on me, not the horses, but hopefully, I learn as I go what not to do and don’t make the same error twice. :slight_smile: And FWIW some of them have gone on in the hunters, jumpers and eventing. These horses are very good, careful, scopey jumpers (with only 1 exception - the Weltmeyer).

Every time I get on a Waldaire - it is the same but from the other side of a pedigree. I am riding him clothed in the mare’s phenotype. For kicks I’ll get on him once in a while and check back on the ‘original model’ and, yep, it’s the same. As a rider - the consistency is what makes my job easy(er)…but IMHO you have to really like a horse to breed it. :winkgrin:

There is another damline here on the farm that the offspring are comedians and do not suffer fools. Super smart, thinkers and very athletic…not necessarily a horse for everyone or mares that can be bred to just any stallion. :slight_smile:

But all of this means one thing - inventory and an in house rider/trainer team to bring them along, raise them and assess daily what’s going on with each horse. I strongly encourage people (MO’s, riders) if they are in the area to come sit on a few of the horses before they breed. It doesn’t have to be one of the stallions but if they are looking to breed and are riders - they should sit on a relative…there is no better way of being sure you ‘like’ a stallion than to ride him/his offspring. Honestly.

Hope that helps some.

[QUOTE=Manni01;5679658]
No Tasker, I have to apologize for being new in this board writing horrible English and trying to prove everybody is wrong (which is really not my intention. )

But I will try to find the breeding of Rabauke. I´m sure the information is stored in the www somewhere…[/QUOTE]

Manni - you are doing fine! :slight_smile: Your english is way better than my German!!! :smiley:

Tasker - while I envy your family’s experience with horses and longevity in the sport, I would suggest that maybe breeding the way you do will limit your view to some extent.

I don’t want every one of my horses to “ride or feel the same” because I always think that there is room for improvement. And the only way I’m going to find that improvement is by taking some risks occasionally… Mind you, taking a risk to me is using a very proven mare and an unproven stallion with impeccable bloodlines, and then building on that. And I also think that my mares are way too valuable to go into the sport because they do what they’re supposed to do - produce dynamite foals.

Just my opinion…

I agree Siegi! And using the word ‘same’ over and over may not have conveyed what I am trying to say very well.

I’ll try to explain it better - the mind is the mind of the previous generation. The body rides in a similar fashion (not a drastic hotter/colder factor) but the legs are more responsive and the reaction time is quicker…but the essential ‘horse’ has not changed. We add stallions into the mix to change defects in the current mare/generation - does she need a better engine/hindleg/quicker reactions or does she need a bit less reactivity? Better canter with more jump/air time? Topline?

Does that make it more clear? (you can see why I ride better than I communicate w/ the two legged folks…) :slight_smile:

ETA: And I agree some mares are more valuable as broodies than riding horses. I’m opting to hold back 2 fillies for ET and we’ll freeze embryos from them next year as it is too risky to breed them…and that way we have the best of both worlds.

Oh and a ? - this all hypothetical and a sincere question - you would take a proven mare and opt for an unproven (but well pedigreed stallion) over a proven stallion? I understand the risk/possible reward but am curious why the choice to go with an unknown factor…

Thanks for your answer, Tasker. To me breeding really isn’t always about numbers and facts and indices, etc., and as much as I always consider those things, there are times when I just get this “feeling” for lack of a better word that this young stallion would do well with one of my proven mares. And since I’ve been doing this for around 20 some years, I allow myself this little “gamble” every now and then (I call it my fun breeding! :)). It’s amazing what some of those fun breedings have produced (and I mean that in a good way :)).

Just last week I had one of my mares who was involved in my latest fun breeding preg-checked, and yes, she is in foal. The mare is a Star Preferent mare whose foals have consistently been in the Top Five in the country for KWPN-NA foals, and the stallion is Bretton Woods. Now I understand that Bretton Woods frozen semen is no good and I may have one of only two pregnancies in the country!! :eek: I’m definitely looking forward to that foal… :yes:

Gotcha Siegi! I’ve cast my vote with my gut when it comes to picking stallions too…so I totally get that! :slight_smile:

Have to agree with Seigi. Breeding is an Art. If you could breed by numbers and indices, or breed the best to the best, and get the “best”, breeding would be much easier. You must breed with knowledge and excellent mares and stallions, but after that, the “Art” component kicks in.

Siegi, lucky you on the Bretton Woods pregnancy! A shame to hear his semen isn’t very good…such a spectacular young stallion.

If we always bred to the “proven” stallion , we wouldn’t have founded any enduring lines. You must have the confidence to breed to the young, unproven stallion… with your best mares of course !

I suspect thoroughbred breeders would agree about it being an art to produce a top horse.
As the rider is a bit like a sculptor, I think what Tasker was trying to allude to is the fact that while the exterior changes with each generation, the location of and response to the “buttons” doesn’t really change much from one generation to the next. Some might be a bit hotter or cooler, depending on the genetic recipe, but for instance, the way the rider can sit in and get a canter depart has a familial quality. The craft of carving the trained horse out of the unbroken youngster/piece of clay has few surprises, and more than many thrills.

THIS!!!

:slight_smile: There’s mom to the rescue! She can articulate things so much better than I can!!! :slight_smile: Thanks mom!

No problem! And it is fun when there are no buttons missing too!:wink:

Although this is a good story, it only speaks of pedigree being average, not the horses ability. I will take an athletic horse with a poor pedigree over the opposite any day. To get to GP, you need an athlete under you, good pedigree or not. As you have already stated, it is easier with athletic horses. The best riders in the world do not start with less. As breeders, we need to recognize the combination of talent, mind, and body that creates the upper level sport horse. Breeding considers all aspects, just like the rider does. The only difference is the rider can walk away when they don’t see it. Breeders, have to go back to the drawing board. Just like in your story, the talented ones will get picked up, they rarely are before they demonstrate it. So too the OP question, you may not ever breed a GP dressage horse, but you should challenge yourself to breed one that can do it. Maybe you will be lucky one day and someone will make it a GP horse.

Tim

Well as we are talking about evaluationg foal movement and as I cannot find, that the OP started out this thread by asking how to get from foal movement the impression whether it´ll be able to become a GP horse (which I think is not possible in general)
I would like to stress another aspect… For me the dam is something extremly important for the evaluation of the future movement of the foal.
My experience is that mares which are good producers tend to give great parts of their movements to their foals. So if there are problems in the movement of the mare, there is a big chance that the foal might inherit this.
And of course the other way around…
Sorry for always bringing my own horses but in this case I think it is a good example.

The mother

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQYJ07b9Rbw

May 2009 Daughter

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVYP5kDkx_0

IMO you can see many similarities in those two horses…
So when I look at foals, usually I look at the mother first. And for me she doesn´t need to be a GP horse…