[QUOTE=Sandy M;7942341]
The Horse with the Flying Tail has more than the “misunderstood horse,” component. Other than the fact that apparently Nautical was not an easy ride, the only “accurate” part of it is the actual film of the horse jumping in competition. While he was what now would probably be termed an Appendix QH, he was bred to be a jumper, sired by a Palomino QH out of an Army remount mare (probably mostly TB), though they probably didn’t think he’d be an Olympic quality jumper. He was never a cow pony or “abused” rent/lesson horse. That is all Disney fantasy. He was competing as a jumper when Hugh Wiley bought him, but was considered somewhat “unreliable,” but Wiley and deNemethy obviously solved that problem. LOL So, I’d go with “Disney” in the title probably guarantees inaccuracy.
The Year of the Horse - the book upon which The Horse in the Grey Flannel Suit was based, was soooooo much better than the movie, though the movie is amusing. Why is it that 90% of childen in Disney movies have lost a parent? The father in the book was very much married, not a widower.[/QUOTE]
I haven’t read “Year of the Horse” but I may have to look for it because I always liked the movie. But I’ll bet making the dad a widower was a convenient way to make the romantic subplot with the horse trainer less scandalous … Disney probably thought an extramarital affair was not appropriate content for a family movie!
And kids with two surviving, caring parents probably aren’t considered plucky underdogs.