[QUOTE=rainechyldes;7096031]
sorry I have to totally disagree . QH and TB people - that’s their defense but it’s untrue. Most horses - including scrubby range bred mares are not skeletally mature until they are5/ 6 give or take 6 months for environmental factors. . Causing excessive amounts of microfractures in horses as young as 2 is not beneficial to long term soundness. People mostly concern themselves with grow plates in the knees… every bone in the skeleton has growth plates and they ‘close’ as we like to say at different rates or fuse - depending on what you prefer to call it. The cervical bones don’t fuse in ANY breed of horse until the 5th year. - meaning starting a horse young, you are more likely to do permanent injury to a horses back and neck then any ‘unsoundness’ you may think you are doing to their legs. I’ve seen horses with slipped backs - ridden at 2, bred at 3 - it’s a mess.
And male horse mature skeletally slower then females - and the bigger/taller your horse is means it matures even slower. So your 17.2hh WB with the lovely elegant neck? might look all grown up but it’s possible he might at the age of up to and beyond 7 years still be maturing.
You are more likely to have a much healthier (talking physical soundness only of course) horse the later you start them - not the earlier.[/QUOTE]
Thank you for this ^^
My sister & I debate this issue constantly. She rides and shows Paints and I raise & train Arabians but have a wonderful young lady ride and show them for me. I don’t understand riding the huge 3 y/o gelding whose knees aren’t together much less mentally ready for hard work. My sister swears it doesn’t hurt them but her horse is 8 and needs hock injections while mine never have. And IMO, geldings have a better chance of living a long life if they stay sound. And besides, what is the hurry? And fwiw, I am disgusted by AHA adding 3 y/o saddleseat futurities to the larger shows. Again, IMO, this creates throwaway horses.