[QUOTE=DeeThbd;6886609]
I’m wondering though…why is a stallion expected to prove his worthiness to be a sire, and yet a mare does not? I am coming at this from the angle that EP Taylor felt that the mare was the greatest contributor to the future foal. Granted, a mare can only produce one foal a year, whereas a stallion can sire a large number…but it seems like a similar standard should apply, no?[/QUOTE]
You don’t state it, but do you mean because these mares haven’t won competition? Or what are you getting at?
I am breeding my three year old this year for the reasons already listed. Although I personally don’t put a lot of stock in foal inspections, she was a top five filly as a foal in her registry, and won in breeding classes as a yearling against older mares as well (I didn’t show last year).
But even if she hadn’t I believe (based on evaluating many horses over the years) that I have a pretty good, critical eye and I know she is a good mover, athletic and well conformed. She is also very well bred with a good temperment. I imagine the other breeders breeding three year olds are also looking at the same things: their bloodlines, siblings, mothers, etc. in addition to the (hopefully excellent) mare in front of them, so it isn’t like they are complete unknowns. Also, if your job is as a broodmare, you prove yourself at your job. There are high level competition horses that are still not good choices for breeding stock. Many of the greatest mares in history were never competition horses, fwiw. Their value was as broodmares.
Finally, personally, I plan to have this mare be a competition horse, and I would like to see what she produces now, so in a few years if I am looking at doing embryo transfer I have some idea of 1) if it is justified and 2) what she throws.