[QUOTE=monstrpony;4344708]
Both are a little lighter than pure neatsfoot oil. I would not use them interchangeably, if only for the fact that you’re not supposed to get the darkening oil on your hands. Not because it darkens them, but I believe one of the ingredients is toxic and can be absorbed through the skin.
The Hydrophane oil is really nice. For new, dry leather, I’d use regular neatsfoot, but once you get the leather broken in and to a good degree of softness, using the Hydrophane just as you would neatsfoot works great. If you have really well prepared leather, like some of the expensive bridles or saddles, I’d not use neatsfoot at all, just use Hydrophane, when conditioning.[/QUOTE]
I hadn’t heard that before. Apparently it’s not too toxic, because I’ve had plenty of it on my hands! I just looked at my can and it has a big ol’ red X on it and says not to eat it or let it touch skin. How have I never noticed that before?? It says aliphatic hydrocarbons, whatever that is.
As for the original question, I haven’t really noticed a difference in effectiveness between the 2, and I don’t know what’s different about the darkening oil, but they seem to work pretty much the same to me.