[QUOTE=CVPeg;6396826]
Finally have to respond to this constant recent bit of “fact”, that is taking on a life of its own. And yes, has even now been mentioned on a NY Times blog. And unfortunately, there are some racing bloggers on the NY Times who are less than factual.
Please refrain from using this example. It is one that was promoted for one purpose, and evidently not checked factually. It really has no merit. Trust me.
Edited to add: However, the ESPN piece does not mention what you are alluding to, and is, in fact, still correct.[/QUOTE]
Okay, please say more. I will trust you, but expand. What part is not true? Is it not true that the wife was an exercise rider, or that there was a wife, or that the wife used dressage techniques, that the wife helped make the horse, or that Seattle Slew was difficult? And now I am curious as to the “one purpose” for which “it” was promoted.
I am not trying to dispute you, because I only know what I read. I don’t know any of these people and I don’t know any of the people who knew any of the people.
But back to the original topic of the filly who pulls, and ideas to get her to stop… The idea (of saddle training a young thoroughbred for general riding) seems sensible to me. I have read (again, just read, don’t know the people who do this) that race horses in England are trained a little more like riding horses, and are expected to behave without a pony horse, and in fact, are not ponied even on the track. So, why not use dressage (or other style) techniques? That is not a rhetorical question; I really want to know. Again, I imagine it is a time/money issue, that a farm only has a few riders who are too busy to add extra duties, but I don’t know, there may be other reasons. Maybe it confuses the horse. Maybe it is hard on their bodies because it would mean more saddle time on a young, developing horse.