Wild Bays have a minimal amount of black, and it’s a “soft black”
As JB said.
A Wild Bay doesn’t really have “true black points”…it will only have smudges of black on the legs, and often, it’s a “light or soft black”.
I have also seen that many Wild Bays do have faded/lightish manes and tails, but nothing like what you see on the examples in my post earlier. Usually just some cream/light hairs in the mane and/or tail.
Here are some Wild Bays, and you can see what I mean by “soft black” and very minimal/low/smudgy points (lower legs)
http://www.ultimatehorsesite.com/images_colors/baywild.JPG
This ones’ black wasn’t pushed down as low as the top horse, but you can see how soft it is. This horse also has cream hairs in the mane/tail and the light lower legs of course:
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk150/elaineshickman/Color/WildBay.jpg
Here’s a combination, very unusual horse. TESTED as bay:
http://i279.photobucket.com/albums/kk150/elaineshickman/Color/hodaKhromeNBbyKhartoonKhlassic_bay_DW.jpg
- He’s a wild bay (see how smudgy, nearly-non-existant the black is on his front leg? And how it’s “soft”? It’s more of a grey/charcoal “smudge/hint” of black)
- He’s Dominant White which HEAVILY influenced his mane and tail (silver/flaxen)
- He’s a BABY, so the “baby flaxen” is also giving him a boost, and he still has the “baby influence” on his lower legs I think (not just wild bay making his points so light)
[QUOTE=NorCalDressage;5507463]
Is the Gulastra Plume what people also refer to as a “wild bay” or it this something different?
Is the silver expressed in the mane hairs as well, or only the tail?
I ask because I have one that is a bay - mostly black mane & tail, but with about 25% silver hairs in the tail - less in the mane. And her lower legs, especially when shaved have a silver black look. A full sister to the horse has a full silver tail & more silver in the mane than my mine.
I was told this was a “wild bay” coloring.[/QUOTE]