Correct dressage develops gait quality. I think we all understand that, and it’s part of why gaits are so tied on to scoring.
However, what is high gait quality? Shouldn’t gait quality mean engagement, balance, swing, quality of collection, correct rhythm, etc? Instead, it appears height of forelegs and bounce of haunches are the hallmarks of great gait scores, regardless of stiff backs and trailing haunches.
I knew I had an issue with modern judging for sure when I was scribing for the L program. There was a naturally talented horse showing first level, who was well behind the vertical and didn’t track up, but in the trot lengthening resembled the flash of many GP horses. The judge who was training the group was asked how to score that, and the response was, “well, since the horse is behind the vertical you can’t give a 10.” Aka, it was a 9. Several of the L candidates expressed my thoughts, that it was clearly incorrect and bad for the horse, but it was dismissed as “young horse who hasn’t built up strength yet.”
That horse had a career ending injury within 2 years, and I’ve read multiple vets citing that type of injury as due to incorrect work. But judges repeatedly scored the horse well and didn’t identify anything wrong with the basics which led to the problem. And they are being trained not to - I don’t blame the judges individually, I blame the entire methodology being used.