[QUOTE=jnrfarm;7979310]
first of all i text you pictures of the horses i sold you your husband came here was here talking about the horses took pictures of the horses talk to you on the phone about the horses for over a hr then we loaded them on your trailer and then he paid me for them it is not my falt if your horse got injured on his way home in a small 3 horse slant load trailer not built for drafts your husband could have walked at that time if he didnt like the horses or thought something was wrong but he didnt you contacted me 2 and 1/2 weeks later to say there was something wrong with his eye so why dont you grow up and take responcibility for your actions you now blame me after you had them for 2 weeks and say it is my falt when something could have happened on the trailer have you ever thought of that and his eye was not clouded here at all and you know it so does your husband you just want me to be responcible for something i did not do or have anything to do with it is just easier to bash me on here[/QUOTE]
We would think that a large majority of the public reading your rebuttal, if they would otherwise be unfamiliar with you personally, would agree with your opinion. We would be considered as: “Idiots who do not know anything about equine management and care”
They would also assume that we do not have any experience with drafts, while in truth, we have several drafts of our own, in fact many horses at the farm.
The veterinarian arrived a day or two after the eye injury was first noticed (the injury was noticed upon the horses’ arrival, fyi). Severe scarring was already present, and medically speaking, this level of damage would have been impossible to attain during a 5 hour transport. The vet diagnosed it as a deep stromal ulcer. In the end we were quoted between $2K - $5K for treatment of the horses’ eye injury.
In addition to the injured eye, the team was not in fact a driving team - the two drove independently, at some point or another, before being dumped at an auction or at Finch’s front steps by the Amish.
It is very possible that after Finch acquired the injured horse, he injected a drug or two to make him appear somewhat “normal” and then put it up for sale. It makes complete sense, as banamine IM or even IV, for example, only lasts approximately 5-6 hours, depending on dose and the severity of the health concern at hand.
The next time the vet arrived, she performed a thorough examination of one of the Belgian’s rather “uncoordinated” gait (same horse with eye injury). He appeared to either have a previous back injury, or congenital back problem, or a form of ataxia, or even wobblers syndrome. Something we can test for if we deem it necessary. The horse is currently “retired” until we will decide what his prognosis is for the purposes of training.
When horses appear to have ataxia while walking, it makes hitching impossible and very dangerous, as the horse displays increased sensitivity in its hind quarters.
We asked for photos of both horses from Rob Finch. The only photo he provided were taken from a distance.
After this entire ordeal, we asked for photos again, he failed to provide them.
In addition, the horses were not supplied with a Coggins, nor a vaccination history, which Finch claimed he had.
Rob Finch sold both horses to us for $2,500.00
Frankly speaking, we believe that as a purchaser, we should not “take our chances” on purchasing an animal - sellers should be upfront about possible health concerns and issues with temperament.