Jumpers disqualified for doping ???

And if I’ve been tested while using it and it’s negative, I’m going to assume there is no problem.

The thing about tests is that you can never assume that the tests used in the past are the same tests that are going to be used tomorrow. They don’t test for the same substances in every test. The tests themselves are always changing according to new technology and new trends, and there have been so many cases of people using “untestable” products that the USEF/FEI gets wind of and develops a test for, and suddenly large groups of people get caught for the same thing. If the substance is listed as forbidden, and rumor has a number of people are using it, then you can bet there is a test being developed for it.
The news reports even say that it was a new test being used in these particular cases:
http://www.monstersandcritics.com/sport/olympics2008/news/article_1425938.php/Four_riders_caught_out_by_new_test_for_&quotequestrian_EPO%22_Monday__Roundup_

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/olympics/article4598345.ece

Wasn’t it published somewhere that Lynch participated in the voluntary testing before the games started? If so, I would think he had every right to conclude that anything in his normal reginem that was acceptable then would be acceptable during the games. If not, talk about your bait & switch…

The second article specifically says that capsaicin was not tested for in the voluntary testing. I’m assuming the reporter did their homework, which may not be a valid assumption. But I doubt the voluntary testing came with a guarantee that the process was going to be exactly the same for in-competition testing.

Upon searching, it seems the voluntary tests came with a very specific indication of what exactly was being tested:
http://www.fei.org/Media/News_Centre/News/Pages/news-PAET-25July08.aspx

I didn’t cheat, why would I cheat?

If the news for Denis Lynch in Hong Kong on Thursday was shattering, it wasn’t much better back in his native Tipperary on Friday.

The newspaper headlines were rough, reporters were besieging the family home and his parents had had a sleepless night.

His horse, Lantinus – ranked number one in the world – had tested positive for a banned substance, he’d been suspended from the Olympics just hours before the showjumping final and his reputation as an honest sportsman had been tarnished.

Aggrieved by the media coverage and distressed for his family, Lynch, in the early hours of Saturday morning Hong Kong time, spoke by phone from his hotel bedroom to the Sunday Independent in a bid to set the record straight.

“I didn’t cheat,” he said, “and I’ve no reason to cheat. I’m on the best horse in the world, why would I cheat? I’ve won four five-star Grands Prix (this year), I’m in the top 20 in the world, I know what I’ve done all year and I did nothing different (for the Olympics).”

Lantinus has been tested 12 times this year and Lynch voluntarily submitted the horse again for testing after the 10-year-old gelding arrived in Hong Kong for the Games, “to make sure the horse was clean”.

This was his 11th test, the result was negative. The 12th was taken after the second round of jumping last Sunday. At about 2.15pm on Thursday Lynch was informed by the showjumping team manager Robert Splaine that this test had produced a positive result.

They met with officials and veterinarians from the international equestrian federation, the FEI, who told them that traces of a substance called capsaicin had been found in the animal’s sample. It had been found in three other horses which were also banned from competing in the final.

At a subsequent press conference senior FEI officials said capsaicin was a prohibited substance because its pain-relieving properties were potentially performance-enhancing. It also had “hypersensitisation” properties: if applied to a horse’s shins it could inflame them, thereby inducing the animal to jump higher to avoid painful contact with a fence – a practice known as ‘chemical rapping’.

Paul Farrington, a vet with the FEI, said capsaicin had always been banned but only recently had a test been developed to detect it.

But Lynch claims that “the FEI moved the goalposts” for the Beijing Games. “How can a horse test negative all year and then test positive when I’ve changed nothing? That’s the question. I didn’t change anything, I did nothing different (for the Games), why change anything when I was doing the same thing all year and winning?”

The substance is contained in an ointment sold commercially as Equi-Block. “I’ve been using this product for eight years,” said Lynch. “And a lot of international riders have been using the product for the last eight years, over half of them I would say. You can buy it from every vet, in every tack shop, at shows all over the world. It does not make a lame horse sound, it does not make a horse jump higher. It’s a cream that we rub on a horse’s back to warm him up and make him loose.”

Lynch said he was the only one of the four suspended riders who spoke to the media after the story broke. During his press conference he produced a tub of Equi-Block. The label on the product has a specially highlighted piece of information: ‘Contains CAPSAICIN. Will not test positive’. Did this not trigger alarm bells for Lynch?

“But everyone’s been using it! Fifteen horses were tested and four were positive. If 40 horses were tested then 14 would have tested positive and what would have happened then? If you use it (Equi-Block) over eight years and I’ve been tested and tested and tested, why would you think it was a doping product? It’s not about cheating, it’s got nothing to do with cheating.”

But shouldn’t he have checked out what sort of substance capsaicin was, given that it was linked with the words ‘positive’ and ‘test’ on the label of the product? “Do you know how much (capsaicin) is in the cream? Well I don’t either. And yesterday (Thursday) the FEI couldn’t tell me how much of the substance was in the sample. They couldn’t say how long he (Lantinus) was positive: was it two days in his system, was it two hours in his system? They couldn’t tell me anything.”

He also rejected any suggestion that he was engaged in chemical rapping. “Jesus I don’t have a clue about it. I’ve used it on horses’ backs, that’s it. There’s no ifs and buts anymore. That’s all. I’ve got nothing to do with it, I know nothing about it, I never want to have anything to do with it.”

On Thursday evening while the final was underway, Lynch returned to his hotel and “closed the door”. He didn’t watch the final on television, he was in a state of shock. On Friday morning he woke up to headlines that humiliated him and news from home that upset him further.

“My mum called me and said reporters were there tormenting them. She hasn’t slept, my father hasn’t slept. They’re getting hammered by the media. It’s sickening. Sickening. I’ve got fantastic support from my family, my friends, my sponsors, people in Tipperary and from all around the country. And then to be slaughtered like that – it’s wrong.”

Lynch, 32, and his horse jumped three rounds in Beijing. The first two were clear bar time penalties and in the third he faulted only at the water jump. The combination was in superb form and on course for a high finish in the final.

“I belonged in the ring that day. That was my dream. I worked 15 years to get there. I didn’t go to the Olympics hoping to come 17th or 24th or whatever. I went there with a realistic chance of a medal. And then to be shot down like this . . .”

He knows he will be suspended from competition for a period of time. “But whatever (sanction) they give me will be nothing compared to this. To have everything taken away from you – the biggest thing you could ever do in this sport is to represent your country at the Olympics and to have it taken away from you like that is a total shock.”

Yesterday morning Lynch left Hong Kong for Germany where he lives with his partner Simona and their four-year-old daughter. He will return to Tipperary town “to thank the people for their support before the Olympics and especially for their support now. And afterwards life has got to move on.”

But he left Hong Kong behind him with a world of regrets. He admits to being stunned and incredibly disappointed. "I went out there on a mission: to win a gold medal, or a medal of some sort, and that was it. Nothing else.

“And up to a quarter past two yesterday, everything was perfect.”

  • TOMMY CONLON

Quelle : www.independant.ie

[QUOTE=CBoylen;3471741]
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/sport/olympics/article4598345.ece[/QUOTE]

Interesting article:

Yet the FEI clearly targeted this substance for these Games and were extremely careful not to flag their intention. Four years ago they trained their sights on certain substances but they issued warnings. In 2004 their intelligence was that riders were using human psychotic drugs, unlicensed for use in horses, to calm what are known as “hot” horses. They quietly began testing for these substances in April 2004 and sent emails to all of the national federations alerting them to their concerns. Before the Athens Games started they issued a clear warning on the doping control pages of their website. In their trawl Waterford Crystal and Cian O’Connor were caught in the nets and stripped of the gold medal.

This time there were no warnings. Nobody was tipped off with a word in the ear. When the riders arrived in Hong Kong they were offered what is termed a postarrival elective test for their horses. No obligation. Lynch decided that Lantinus should have the test. The urine sample had to be submitted within 12 hours of the horse landing in Hong Kong and the team vet, Marcus Swail, waited seven hours before Lantinus issued a sample. The samples were screened for more than 60 substances but not capsaicin.

Evidently the FEI’s reasoning was twofold. They wanted to catch horses in competition and weren’t prepared to send up a flare with the postarrival elective test. They also believed that capsaicin was primarily being used on the circuit as a hypersensitising agent and not as a pain reliever. Their best chance of catching offenders was in competition on the day when, they believed, it would be applied to the horse’s shins. Only 20 showjumping horses were tested at these Olympics and four tested positive for this substance and this substance alone. By any criteria it is an extraordinary strike rate.

This issue has dogged showjumping for a long time. Hypersensitising is a formal term for what is known in Ireland and elsewhere in the equestrian world as “rapping”.

This refers to an illegal training practice where the horse’s shins are brought into contact with a pole or a stick as he’s jumping, to make him jump higher.

However, horses in competition are regularly checked for evidence of this. The shins of sport horses are a constant focus of scrutiny for possible wrongdoing. For years skin swabs used to be taken and that gave way to thermal photography which, for some reason, was absent from these Olympics.

More commonly riders are asked to submit their horse to a “boot check” after they leave the arena. The leather or plastic boots that protect their lower legs are removed by the horse’s groom and the steward examines the shins for any abnormalities or discolouration. He will also smell the boot for any chemical odour. After both of Lantinus’s qualifying rounds in Hong Kong he was subjected to a boot check and was passed by the steward.

[QUOTE=CBoylen;3471830]
Upon searching, it seems the voluntary tests came with a very specific indication of what exactly was being tested:
http://www.fei.org/Media/News_Centre/News/Pages/news-PAET-25July08.aspx[/QUOTE]

Interesting; it also comes with the line:

These tests will not cover doping agents and any medications not on the scope of FEI Elective Testing.

and the FEI has classified capsaicin as a doping agent.

and the FEI has classified capsaicin as a doping agent

The FEI classifieds their forbidden substances by both substance type and purpose:
http://www.fei.org/Rules/Veterinary/Documents/AnnexIII-EquineProhibitedList.pdf

To be fair, the USEF lists capsaicin by name in their medication documents, and has for some time, which is why many of us are aware of it. However, I can’t find it by name in the FEI rules, just the lump classification of “hypersensitising agents” as doping in their prohibited list. It’s possible that someone who wasn’t familiar with USEF rules, and didn’t look to closely into other applications for the ingredients in his products, could have been unaware it was illegal.

The specific statement on that I don’t understand is: "These tests will not cover doping agents"

ok so what are the other medications on the list…Ace, Bute, Codeine, Ketaprofen, etc for if they aren’t “doping” agents? :confused: :confused: :confused:

Sure I could make anything on that list (and many that aren’t) out to have non-doping qualities if I wanted to but a horse with a large amount of Codeine? I think we could guess what that’s for

[QUOTE=CBoylen;3472005]
The FEI classifieds their forbidden substances by both substance type and purpose:
http://www.fei.org/Rules/Veterinary/Documents/AnnexIII-EquineProhibitedList.pdf

To be fair, the USEF lists capsaicin by name in their medication documents, and has for some time, which is why many of us are aware of it. However, I can’t find it by name in the FEI rules, just the lump classification of “hypersensitising agents” as doping in their prohibited list. It’s possible that someone who wasn’t familiar with USEF rules, and didn’t look to closely into other applications for the ingredients in his products, could have been unaware it was illegal.[/QUOTE]

I can only speak for myself personally. If I read a label that said “Will not test” a lot of bells and whistles, horns and fireworks would go off in my head warning me that there was most likely something in that product that I shouldn’t be using.

[QUOTE=CBoylen;3472005]
The FEI classifieds their forbidden substances by both substance type and purpose:
http://www.fei.org/Rules/Veterinary/Documents/AnnexIII-EquineProhibitedList.pdf

To be fair, the USEF lists capsaicin by name in their medication documents, and has for some time, which is why many of us are aware of it. However, I can’t find it by name in the FEI rules, just the lump classification of “hypersensitising agents” as doping in their prohibited list. It’s possible that someone who wasn’t familiar with USEF rules, and didn’t look to closely into other applications for the ingredients in his products, could have been unaware it was illegal.[/QUOTE]

That’s very interesting, CBoylen, especially in conjunction with the other article which suggests that the FEI did not want to tip anyone off that they were looking for capsaicin. I never would have thought of it (or the camphor in vetrolin etc) as problematic if it had not been explicitly listed by USEF - after all, capsaicin is food for humans, if not horses. When you read that document, if that was all you knew, I can see why “does not test” on a label might not make you think much harder about it.

But still, I’m left trying to understand Germany getting caught in the web, again. Ireland, Norway, Brazil do not have the resources of the USEF at hand. But Germany most certainly does, and was highly motivated to have a full slate of clean tests.

[QUOTE=flshgordon;3472052]
The specific statement on that I don’t understand is: "These tests will not cover doping agents"

ok so what are the other medications on the list…Ace, Bute, Codeine, Ketaprofen, etc for if they aren’t “doping” agents? :confused: :confused: :confused:

Sure I could make anything on that list (and many that aren’t) out to have non-doping qualities if I wanted to but a horse with a large amount of Codeine? I think we could guess what that’s for[/QUOTE]

I think their distinction is meant to be ‘substances that have no theraputic benefit and could be harmful to the horse’ versus ‘substances that we can understand might be in your horse due to earlier beneficial/sensible administration.’

But the codeine caught me as well. I wasn’t aware people used codeine theraputically in horses.

If I read a label that said “Will not test” a lot of bells and whistles, horns and fireworks would go off in my head warning me that there was most likely something in that product that I shouldn’t be using.

Well, me too. I also tend to avoid anything with the word “block” or “freeze” in the brand name, but maybe not everyone thinks that way.

ok so what are the other medications on the list…Ace, Bute, Codeine, Ketaprofen, etc for if they aren’t “doping” agents? :confused: :confused: :confused:

It doesn’t make sense logically, but the prohibited list does rank what is doping and what is medication. The classification makes a big difference in the punishment too.

That article actually makes me sick to my stomach that this is the way they go about testing. To me it seems like they purposely set out to trap people for certain substances they thought might be used…even though they could be used in innocuous ways. I don’t know…how about we make a statement and say “we feel like this is becoming a big problem and that Xyz agent could be used for chemical rapping so we’re coming after everyone big time”. It just seems so bizarre to say we’re giving you the free testing up front but “oh wait…we’re testing for completely different crap during the actual competition so too bad for you”. I’ve never heard of capsaicin being something that would test. Now I have to go see if anything I use (liniments/creams) have it as an ingredient.

Since I am now SO curious to the diff between the above tested substances & doping, I toured the website and low and behold…talk about your contradictions…

From the “Prohibited Substances (DOPING)” section Annex III:

I can’t vouch for every single one, but nearly ALL of the substances listed in the article above fall under the section heading “Prohibited Substances (DOPING)”…there is no distinction between the two. Anti-epileptic drugs, narcotics, steroids, tranquilizers, they’re all on there. I did not find a direct listing of Capsaicin though…perhaps I’m looking in the wrong place?

They say they don’t test for doping agents but all the above are found under the FEI’s heading with DOPING in the title…:confused:

[QUOTE=CBoylen;3472005]

To be fair, the USEF lists capsaicin by name in their medication documents, and has for some time, which is why many of us are aware of it. However, I can’t find it by name in the FEI rules, just the lump classification of “hypersensitising agents” as doping in their prohibited list. It’s possible that someone who wasn’t familiar with USEF rules, and didn’t look to closely into other applications for the ingredients in his products, could have been unaware it was illegal.[/QUOTE]

CBoylen, do you mean that the FEI does not specifically list capsaicin by name as a prohibited substance, but rather merely states that “hypersensitizing agents” are not allowed? And, if that is correct, it was because capsaicin (along with probably just about any other substance I might find under my kitchen sink) --merely might be used for chemical rapping (as well as a number of benign purposes) – that a positive result for that substance was deemed a violation of the anti-doping rules? If so, I would say the FEI might have a problem on their hands.

[QUOTE=bluemoonfarms;3472055]
I can only speak for myself personally. If I read a label that said “Will not test” a lot of bells and whistles, horns and fireworks would go off in my head warning me that there was most likely something in that product that I shouldn’t be using.[/QUOTE]

I don’t disagree, but that applies to Lynch. What about the other 3 riders’ horses? Do we have any statements from their riders?

I agree. If you’re going to compete on that level, know the damned rules or stay home. Doesn’t take a brain surgeon to figure it out. :rolleyes:

[QUOTE=poltroon;3472071]

But still, I’m left trying to understand Germany getting caught in the web, again. Ireland, Norway, Brazil do not have the resources of the USEF at hand. But Germany most certainly does, and was highly motivated to have a full slate of clean tests.[/QUOTE]

Germany puzzles me because of their past issues. But I don’t see why any non-US country should have to look at USEF rules, which do not apply, to understand FEI rules, which do.

[QUOTE=YankeeLawyer;3472227]
Germany puzzles me because of their past issues. But I don’t see why any non-US country should have to look at USEF rules, which do not apply, to understand FEI rules, which do.[/QUOTE]

What I mean by that is that USEF is a large national federation, with a great deal of $$ and its own state of the art drug testing labs. Thus, people within USEF are naturally well acquainted with drug testing issues and they’ve had the money to make a list of explicitly prohibited substances (but they are quick to say that substances not on the list but with forbidden qualities are also verboten). They have a hotline with staff that takes member questions about what is permitted and not, and thus they have developed quite a bit of experience and expertise about (a) what tests (b) what horse owners might not guess that will test.

I doubt Ireland, Norway, or Brazil have a hotline that you can call for information on forbidden substances, or that they would have occasion to look at USEF’s list. And since capsaicin is a food ingredient, I don’t think it’s directly obvious that it would be Forbidden.

I agree, “Does Not Test” is like waving a red flag in front of a bull for me. But I can see how, absent the explicit list by USEF, that I would read that, note that the ingredient was capsaicin, noting that I was applying it to the skin only, and think it was still OK. I can also see that if you had been using a tube like that for years and years and years (as I have used Vetrolin for years) that you might not think that much of it.