Kelly Farmer Additional Suspension

While perusing the USEF website I noticed that Ms.Farmer has an additional two month suspension due to the horse Kodachrome testing positive for cocaine. It seems to be tacked on to the lengthy suspension already in place. This one was decided in October of this year.

Two months and a 5K fine, for a competing a horse that tested positive for cocaine? :cool:

If I am correct in my reading comprehension (I’m not really sure) it is not allowed to link to the document. It can be found under hearing committee rulings.

IMHO the USEF committee exhibits some pretty strange reasoning …

If this has already been discussed, I apologize for repeating the topic.

I’m rather slack-jawed at the committee’s reasoning that “On the side of a lower penalty was the pervasive nature of cocaine in our society.” I hardly think cocaine use is pervasive enough that its easy, or commonplace, for a horse to accidentally test positive for it because of environmental issues.

30 Likes

The findings appear to be hidden away from public viewing

Appears you need to be a member to see them?

Yes, that was a relatively recent rule change

For those who can’t get into USEF’s site to read the full hearing, it appears that this feeling may have been in part because Kelley Farmer reported as grounds for “environmental contamination” having fired an employee who was a habitual cocaine user. The hearing notes also state that in favor of a higher penalty is the fact that cocaine is clearly performance-enhancing.

Which… well, yeah, but I’m still trying to get my head around the utility of that particular substance in this division. I know that it increases the exercise potential before exhaustion, but of all the drugs in the world, why on earth would you give a hunter cocaine? It produces sensory hyperstimulation, and while, sure, you could say “it makes them careful,” but, uh, it would also make the horse spooky as hell. (I thought about it being part of a cocktail but would have to imagine that other substances would have shown up in testing as well.)

I’m not sure which situation disappoints me more, this one or the three UL event riders who are on a provisional suspension for failing to secure therapeutic use exemptions prior to taking ADHD drugs- which are uppers. I am not surprised in this case given the people involved, but I am disappointed in a “what is wrong with you people” way.

2 Likes

cocaine is also a numbing agent and can be used as local anesthetic ( nose mouth and eyes)

13 Likes

However, they also note that Ms. Farmer says that the employee with the cocaine problem was fired before the horse tested positive. The whole thing is just bizarre.

So, as it stands, Ms. Farmer’s cocaine in the horse violation gets the same penalty and fine as Ms. Johnson got for unsportsmanlike conduct.

5 Likes

The reasoning is if you hop the horse up on coke the night before its exhausted already on show day

23 Likes

Thanks for the explanation. That’s horrible.

16 Likes

I believe that the cocain is given in advance to make the horse hyper stimulated in its stall so it will eventually exhaust itself and be nice and slow to show later. I have no first hand knowledge of the subject, but this is what I’ve been told when I asked the “WTF would you give a horse coke” question.

5 Likes

What I want to know is where on the USEF website is the Glefke-Farmer case that resulted in the long suspensions. It’s not in the Hearing Committee decisions that are posted on the website.

Yep. You give a hunter coke the night before so he trips all night and is quiet show day. You give it to a saddlebred right before so he’s nice and spicy. Different needs same illegal substance.

6 Likes

The way I read it was that while she submitted testimony that an employee had recently been fired for cocaine, “no concrete proof” was provided. So basically, “Dobbin tested for cocaine? It must have been because of Bob. We fired Bob the week before that due to his ranging cocaine habit.”

vineyridge, it’s odd that the other rulings aren’t online. If they’re going to essentially paywall suspension information into a members-only area, it really should be searchable and include all suspension rulings. Especially suspensions currently being served!

4 Likes

My gut feeling is that they didn’t want to pile on, but they had to give her some suspension. Glefke-Farmer do seem to take USEF drug hearings very lightly, in that they don’t appear and don’t present testimony and evidence. There is a Glefke one for an Aced horse, and no one appeared. He got 5 months for that, and it is from 2016.

2 Likes

The thing that absolutely kills me is on Facebook they seem to be selling plenty of horses. This sport sometimes is so disappointing. Also well known trainers and riders have gone out of their way to show support. This gives me no hope that things will ever change.

30 Likes

Yeah…sorry to say but it ‘hops you up’ at first, and then numbs you out, dulls your brain–hence it’s addictive nature, looking for the up feeling again. I could see using it as ‘dumbing’ agent if someone gave it the night before.

Wow. That is the most awful thing to give a poor horse. How much would it cost to get a horse high enough to crash? Disgusting.

4 Likes

This is official notice of actions taken by the United States Equestrian Federation, Inc. Hearing Committee on October 26, 2017
KELLEY FARMER of Wellington, FL, violated Chapter 4, GR410-411 of this Federation, in connection with the Ocala Winter Classic Horse Show held on February 7-12, 2017, in that she, as trainer, exhibited the horse KODACHROME after it had been administered and/or contained in its body benzoylecgonine and ecgonine methyl ester.

The Hearing Committee noted that prior to the hearing, Ms. Farmer stipulated to the Federation’s case. In mitigation of the penalty the Hearing Committee considered the testimony in Ms. Farmer’s affidavit that before she received notice of this positive she became aware that one of her employee’s was using cocaine and as a result she terminated the employee from her employment. Subsequently, she learned that the employee was a habitual user. Despite these facts, Ms. Farmer claimed this might be the source of contamination. Her affidavit also pointed to environmental contamination because the horse was placed in a dirty stall that had not been cleaned. Ms. Farmer provided no concrete proof to support either scenario and the Hearing Committee had no way to test the credibility of her affidavit based on Ms. Farmer’s decision not to attend the hearing.

In setting the proper penalty, the Hearing Committee considered the significant prior violations against Ms. Farmer for violations of the Drugs and Medications rules. The Hearing Committee believed that Ms. Farmer had been sufficiently penalized for her history of drug violations in a prior ruling, and determined that the appropriate penalties should be set in this case without revisiting the prior penalties levied against her. On the side of a higher penalty was the fact that cocaine can unfairly affect the performance of a competing horse, and that Ms. Farmer did not attend the hearing or present any witnesses to rebut the Charge or explain the positive result. On the side of a lower penalty was the pervasive nature of cocaine in our society, and the higher chance that a cocaine positive could result from some form of environmental contamination. On balance, the Hearing Committee determined unanimously that the following penalties were appropriate for this violation.

For this violation of the rules, the Hearing Committee members present directed that pursuant to Chapter 7, GR703.1b and GR703.1f, KELLEY FARMER, be found not in good standing, suspended from membership, and forbidden from the privilege of taking any part whatsoever in any Licensed Competition for two months, and is excluded from all competition grounds during Licensed Competitions for that period: (1) as an exhibitor, participant or spectator; (2) from participating in all Federation affairs and activities, (3) from holding or exercising office in the Federation or in any Licensed Competition; and (4) from attending, observing or participating in any event, forum, meeting, program, clinic, task force, or committee of the Federation, sponsored by or conducted by the Federation, or held in connection with the Federation and any of its activities.

The two-month suspension shall commence on February 1, 2019 and terminate at midnight on March 31, 2019. Any horse or horses owned, leased, or of any partnership, corporation or stable of hers, or shown in her or her name or for her or her reputation, (whether such interest was held at the time of the alleged violation or acquired thereafter), shall also be suspended, pursuant to Chapter 7, GR703.1c.

The Hearing Committee also directed that KELLEY FARMER be fined $5,000 pursuant to Chapter 7, GR703.1j.

4 Likes

I think you can find links to it in this COTH article.
http://www.chronofhorse.com/article/usef-larry-glefke-kelley-farmer-suspensions-gaba-infraction

Yes, you can find articles about it. However, I agree with the statement above, why is it not on the USEF site? Seems a bit strange to pick and choose what to make available.