Over 10% of runs ended in horse falls (even omitting Tregilder’s fall, which though marked as occurring at the penultimate fence he cleared the fence then stumbled and fell the stride after) - I don’t think that can be painted as a good statistic and think may actually be a worse rate than Badminton. Three horse fell at the trout hatchery, two at open overs before the Cottesmore leap (and there would have been more falls there but for the frangibles doing their job). As soon as you’ve got that rate of horse falls you’re then relying on luck that there are no catastrophic injuries to horse or rider. Luck was obviously on the side of a lot of the fallers where it wasn’t for poor Nicola at Badminton or the Japanese horse at Bramham.
It felt like a pretty bland course on the whole; there were a lot of features/ terrain (ditches, banks, steps, the flyover) that went unused or were only used as alternates and he added back in the Waterloo loop that hasn’t been used for quite a while but did nothing interesting there, just two let up fences. All of the ‘wow’ fences were Burghley classics, like the Cottesmore Leap, with nothing new added like the broken bridge at Badminton for future years. A lot of open rails, skinnies and corners. The one bit I did like was the combination in the arena, that was an interesting line that was tighter in reality than I think the course walk made it appear.