[QUOTE=JLR1;8416207]
Well since you are so busy talking about how everyone else did at the show care to share with everyone how well you and your warmblood did at training level? 
Furthermore it is incredibly condescending to assume just because you have a warmblood you will magically place near the top. Dressage is equal parts horse equal parts rider![/QUOTE]
Sorry, I forget that people who don’t actually know me can’t interpret what I say off text on the internet as no one is a mind reader. 
My goals are really about the training which will be behind them, and not at all about the placing. As RHRT said, I did mean that my goals are on a warmblood just because that is what my horse happens to be, not because she is a warmblood. She has gained strength and ability recently, so I am taking a break from rated shows to prepare for first level. I want her to be capable of excellent first level tests, but as a young, high energy horse, I don’t actually have winning the championship next year as a goal - but having her prepared where it could be a possibility. The day of, we’ll see how we’re doing and that will determine things.
For the record, I tried to buy several non-warmbloods prior to buying my warmblood. I believe if shopping a rider should look for a horse suited toward his/her goals, regardless of breed and type preferences. And I fully believe if a rider already has a horse he/she loves, that rider should use that horse for dressage regardless of breed/type. I care MUCH more about the partnership than show placings, and feel at times show placings are too biased in favor of the WB types.
[QUOTE=Silverbridge;8416497]Yes I’m sure she meant she’d like to be at the top due to work and goal-setting, not because the mare is a WB.
I got see to netg’s mare in one of her tests and during some warmup, and I thought she looked just great. Stepping under, and in the correct stage of connection, and willing, despite some anxieties.
I would expect she will be quite competitive as she matures, regardless of her breed or type. I couldn’t ride a five year old as nicely, I haven’t got the skill set. And anyway for many people, a baby horse’s earliest outings are seen as schooling opportunities first, and competitions, second. I don’t know if that’s how netg looked at it, but I do know she readily adjusts her plans to what the horse needs in the moment.
She was a wonderful onsite cheerleader for my mare’s non-WB presence in the mix, all weekend. No breeditude whatsoever. :winkgrin:[/QUOTE]
Thanks! I am lucky that my trainer is so good at teaching me how to ride her better and be the supportive rider she needs. I prefer the high energy types for riding every day, which means at home they don’t have the same tension but they constantly offer a lot and are self-motivated to move. It just means I need to get mileage with her so she can learn to have less tension away from home, too. Luckily my goals are about progressing and developing and I’m ok with getting low 60s on days she’s super tense, with scores ranging from 4 to 8. I know at home she’s more consistent and as she gets used to showing she will develop more consistency and ocntinue to improve - the tension now is the price of the type of horse I prefer to ride.
As far as how we did, we did get low 60s from 3 different judges, including one who was happy to give scores in the 50s when deserved, and I scratched on day 2 when the super cold and strong wind caused even more tension and upset from her. My goals are much more long term than any one show, and forcing her to go with the level of tension she had that morning would have been a negative toward her future. I only want to have good experiences with her at shows if I can help it. The tension showed us some holes which are fairly imperceptible when she’s relaxed at home/my trainer’s, so they gave us some homework to do.
To me that aspect of showing is actually my favorite part. I want our training to be such that it can withstand the tension and help her relax, and showing helps us find that.
Back to the topic of Lipizzans… I saw travelling shows growing up, I think both SRS and the “World Famous” show. At the time I didn’t know the difference by name necessarily, but I remember being astounded by the difference in quality of performance… we discussed how much better one was than the other, without knowing they were entirely different entities with extremely different histories and reputations. But in both, the horses were absolutely beautiful, and I can see why that “dream horse” aspect exists for the inexperienced and can be an issue. Who wouldn’t want that dream, when they aren’t educated enough to understand how much work goes behind it?