Yes, they are! But the ones in the field aren’t the people who design the tests.
There are tests out there with little value at all. Like those for EPM. Now, before anyone goes batshit, please tell me if one, just one, test for EPM that is 100% definitive. There isn’t one. Now everyone can plié on, tell me how this one does that, etc. But 100%?No.
Would you tolerate a test for something in humans that wasn’t 100% definitive, thumbs up or down, for say COVID? Of course not.
I don’t want indications from a test; I can see those. I want absolute proof.