Good luck with your research!
- Rosie B, the bigot. :winkgrin:
Yah, good luck with that.
[QUOTE=RBABKA;8769393]
Thank you for your crafted adult comment. I would prefer responses that are not bigoted for my research.[/QUOTE]
Nobody here gives a rat’s crap what you “prefer”.
You’ll get what you get, and you’ll learn to love it.
[QUOTE=Silverbridge;8769472]
Nobody here gives a rat’s crap what you “prefer”.
You’ll get what you get, and you’ll learn to love it.[/QUOTE]
No, I do not think so. But your response does give me more codes for the study such as in neanderthal perception of the industry.
This is such a great thread! Silverbridge, you made my day. Thank you. 
[QUOTE=RBABKA;8769534]
No, I do not think so. But your response does give me more codes for the study such as in neanderthal perception of the industry.[/QUOTE]
Reported.
Wait… neanderthal Dressage Queens? I thought this sport was usually considered elitist. See what happens when we relinquished our top hats? We became neanderthals!
Hey, I’m just tickled to learn, after all these years, that dressage is an “industry”.
Aptitude testing always indicated that I’m best suited to work on a factory line, so now, I’m really excited.
[QUOTE=amm2cd;8769722]
Wait… neanderthal Dressage Queens? I thought this sport was usually considered elitist. See what happens when we relinquished our top hats? We became neanderthals![/QUOTE]
I was a strong proponent of losing the toppers, but I was not able to foresee this horrific outcome.
[QUOTE=Rosie B;8769387]
I think this is now my favourite post of all time, courtesy of Silverbridge:
Thank-you Silverbridge!! [/QUOTE]
I agree, it was a wonderful response, Silverbridge, it deserves to be bronzed.
I boarded with Marina in the 80’s and took lessons from her, both on my own horse and some of their’s.
She was always nice to me, and an excellent instructor.
They were importing horses from Germany then too, and it was great to see Marina jumping the youngsters. She was a superb rider.
As one of those the way the horse world goes stories, she imported a young mare who I just loved back in the early 80s. I could not afford this mare, and she was sold…
Years later the beautiful mare, now quite old, came up for sale. I was able to buy her and she became one of my dear broodmares, and lived with me until her death.
As for our ‘new poster’? It does sound like someone with an agenda.
[QUOTE=RBABKA;8769407]
This a qualitative research of the equine industry in the US culture. Do you have a problem with that? Explain to me if you do, because I want to hear it without prolixity.[/QUOTE]
This is actually backdoor muckraking on a popular internet bulletin board, not research.
In the USA the accused has the right to confront their accuser.
Why don’t you get in touch with MS. Genn? If she cares to join us and hash things out here with you I would be happy to peruse the details and comment when I feel it’s appropriate.
Or, you could just start over, and tell us honestly what happened.
Until then you’re just a Troll with a bug up your bum. Does all this fishing really scratch your itch?
Go away, your fingers are covered with ick.
[QUOTE=csaper58;8769782]
This is actually backdoor muckraking on a popular internet bulletin board, not research.
In the USA the accused has the right to confront their accuser.
Why don’t you get in touch with MS. Genn? If she cares to join us and hash things out here with you I would be happy to peruse the details and comment when I feel it’s appropriate.
Or, you could just start over, and tell us honestly what happened.
Until then you’re just a Troll with a bug up your bum. Does all this fishing really scratch your itch?
Go away, your fingers are covered with ick.[/QUOTE]
No this is research. Using DeDoose tool for analysis involving focus groups, articles,anecdotal evidence as well. This is not the only forum and not the only equine industry. There is eventers,jumpers, gaited industry, racing etc.that will be studied. I could care less about anything else. I will also study PETA views as well. I will look into advertising,puffering etc to determine ethics in the conduct of the equine business as well. So lots of ethos,pathos and logos information to enter for a qualitative review and iteration of all the industries. I have experience help in the research world to look at the data as well. So do not get upset person, this is just research.
[QUOTE=Janet;8768033]
GR1307.8
But nobody is likely to CARE if she is not competing.[/QUOTE]
All the restrictions and the penalties refer to the person as competitor or exhibitor. That is, these rules only apply in the horse show arena. They aren’t meant to apply to life outside the arena. And they don’t have any penalties for people whose USEF status is wrong, but who don’t show. Also, their definition of “professional” is broader than one would consider in “normal life.” If someone was paid to clean stalls or keep books, and rode the BO’s horses, we would never think of them as a “horse professional” in real life.
Good G-d, today is the day of bots!
[QUOTE=RBABKA;8769353]
You seem to be an angry individual. So, I will shift gears to a research topic. If a boarding facility accidentally kills your horse due to wrong feed by mistake, and is verified by a vet, do you seek restitution or just let it go and turn it in to the insurance?? What would you do.[/QUOTE]
This is not a research topic. This is not a qualitative question. This doesn’t even make sense as a question. Because the way that you get restitution these days is by turning the problem over to the insurance company and then they sue the other party’s insurance company.
In other words, these are not mutually exclusive categories, unless you are proposing we go burn down the BMs house or something.
The question is whether you work within the law to get an effective resolution. This is a legal question with a simple answer: you do.
RBAKA, I don’t know what, if any, your academic background is. But there are enough well-educated people on this particular horse forum that you can’t go around randomly dropping terms from critical theory, philosophy, and social science into one big word salad, and expect us to take you seriously. You aren’t using these terms correctly, and the disciplines you draw them from are contradictory (ie, social science and philosophy start from such completely different premises that you can’t bundle them into one sentence).
[QUOTE=RBABKA;8769407]
This a qualitative research of the equine industry in the US culture. Do you have a problem with that? Explain to me if you do, because I want to hear it without prolixity.[/QUOTE]
So state your working hypotheses, your methodology, your funders, and your proposed place of publication. Plus your institutional affiliation.
Then state how you plan to use our responses within your research project.
That last is a baseline requirement these days for any research involving humans.
Is your project to pose as a troll, and then see how long it takes for you to get banned from most equine forums? Is your project to pose as a troll and then see how long it takes for the rest of us to get crazeee in response?
BTW, either of these would be rather fun as a sociological or communications research project: “She’s gone CRAYCRAY: Limits of tolerance for Outrider Opinions in the Online Equestrian Community.”
Sample findings: “On average, it took five to eight days and more than six pages of debate before the discussion devolved to a level that participants started saying things like ‘let’s get popcorn’ or ‘do you have a blue saddle?’”
[QUOTE=RBABKA;8769879]
… lots of ethos,pathos and logos information to enter for a qualitative review and iteration of all the industries. [/QUOTE]
Don’t forget D’Artagnan. He’s my favorite.
[QUOTE=RBABKA;8769879]
No this is research. Using DeDoose tool for analysis involving focus groups, articles,anecdotal evidence as well. This is not the only forum and not the only equine industry. There is eventers,jumpers, gaited industry, racing etc.that will be studied. I could care less about anything else. I will also study PETA views as well. I will look into advertising,puffering etc to determine ethics in the conduct of the equine business as well. So lots of ethos,pathos and logos information to enter for a qualitative review and iteration of all the industries. I have experience help in the research world to look at the data as well. So do not get upset person, this is just research.[/QUOTE]
RBAKA, you do not have a research question and you have no idea what you are talking about.
But this thread has reminded me, that actually I do like marking papers and commenting on research proposals, and that I’m looking forward to getting back in the college classroom after a year’s sabbatical!
[QUOTE=Scribbler;8769955]
[snip] one big word salad [snip] [/QUOTE]
Ok this is another new favourite. Word salad!! I love it.
[QUOTE=Scribbler;8769955]
This is not a research topic. This is not a qualitative question. This doesn’t even make sense as a question. Because the way that you get restitution these days is by turning the problem over to the insurance company and then they sue the other party’s insurance company.
In other words, these are not mutually exclusive categories, unless you are proposing we go burn down the BMs house or something.
The question is whether you work within the law to get an effective resolution. This is a legal question with a simple answer: you do.
RBAKA, I don’t know what, if any, your academic background is. But there are enough well-educated people on this particular horse forum that you can’t go around randomly dropping terms from critical theory, philosophy, and social science into one big word salad, and expect us to take you seriously. You aren’t using these terms correctly, and the disciplines you draw them from are contradictory (ie, social science and philosophy start from such completely different premises that you can’t bundle them into one sentence).[/QUOTE] I am looking up equine case law as well but I absolutely agree with your insurance resolution . I just wondered if everybody felt the same or do nothing and chaulk it up to bad luck.As far terminology , what terms. As far the deontological point of view , I studied and agree with Kant and the CI and too bad if you do not agree.I also have a problem with walking horse industry and the abuses adjudicated in court, which also will be studied and the racing industry also. I do not know you and I do not care to, the research will continue from a cross section of this country. As far as funding goes that will be disclosed when published. You guys are a rough crowd but it is okay as a veteran I have had to deal with worse.
