[QUOTE=Lady Eboshi;8699567]
I would love it if riding apparel manufacturers finally recognized that a large percentage of the pleasure-riding market is women with PLENTY of money to spend who are over the age of 35. This means we no longer have boy-like teenybopper bodies with no boobs, hips or thighs. We need breeches that are cut generously, of fabrics and cuts that flatter a more mature figure. Shirts that skim and drape rather than cling like shrink-wrap, with COVERAGE suitable for mature women and in colors and fabrics realistic to keep clean around the barn. Screaming white and pale pastels just aren’t practical, and who comes up with these hideously garish prints and colors like a bad acid trip? The idea used to be that rider attire should both be dignified and flatter the HORSE!
It was a sorry day someone decided “riding” and “gym” clothes should merge.[/QUOTE]
I totally agree. As we age, even though our weight doesn’t change, our figures do. I am now wider through my middle ---- Breeches sized solely by waist size are not designed for the (ahem) middle aged rider.
Please, manufacturers, do not treat the middle aged woman as overweight. Just because our waists (and yes, we do prefer waist high breeches – low rise is for 30 and under) may be a 36 does not mean that the rest of us is a “size 36”.
I have always wondered why men get to choose clothes that are measured in 2 dimensions: neck and sleeve length, waist and inseam. Where as women get size 10, 12, 14.
Oh, and “long” in breeches should not mean that the crotch comes 1/2 way down to our knees, it just means our legs are longer than “regular”.
It is no more expensive to make well fitted clothes, than it does to make clothes which do not suit the target market.