Mb civil suit rulings 11/15/2022

[MHM]

@trubandloki

I think the point being covered is some people are insisting that Michael got no money for anything associated with MHG and MHG’s clients.

Yes, people who are trying to distract and stir the pot. Why help them?

[BigMama1]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I know that the authorities declined to charge him. I know that MB is not suing RG in the civil suit for anything, including tor the injuries to MB incurred when RG subdued him.

Does RG have any assets? MB would spend a fortune on lawyers trying to sue someone who can’t pay any damages. Seems like a smart decision to avoid that.

[HoolieB]

Gravity is a harsh mistress,

[jvanrens]

You forgot not guilty for possession of an illegal firearm.

[trubandloki]

@MHM

@trubandloki

I think the point being covered is some people are insisting that Michael got no money for anything associated with MHG and MHG’s clients.

Yes, people who are trying to distract and stir the pot. Why help them?

Because, when we do not respond them come back with - no one disagreed with my point so that must mean you all agree with it.

[MHM]

@trubandloki

@MHM

@trubandloki

I think the point being covered is some people are insisting that Michael got no money for anything associated with MHG and MHG’s clients.

Yes, people who are trying to distract and stir the pot. Why help them?

Because, when we do not respond them come back with - no one disagreed with my point so that must mean you all agree with it.

Pfft. Who cares what nonsense they spout?

Again I say:

[Jenerationx]

No, you are misrepresenting the situation. You have referred to MB as an active shooter multiple times. He was not. The standard definition is not just about location but intent to kill indiscriminately. It doesn’t matter if the scene was chaotic. A family annihilation killing or domestic violence shooting will be chaotic, but they’re not an “active shooter” situation. We don’t call someone that murders their family a “serial killer,” and we should not call MB an “active shooter.” You’ve been told multiple times this is incorrect and continue to do it, so at this point you’re willfully posting the fallacy.

[Sdel]

@jvanrens

You forgot not guilty for possession of an illegal firearm.

Yes. The gun charges alone show this was a case of jury nullification. They were not going to reward them for setting out to purposefully break someone.

[MHM]

Case in point.

How many times have multiple people gone around the mulberry bush about the active shooter nonsense? Has it made a difference yet? Does it look like it’s ever going to make a difference with this one poster?

[jvanrens]

@trubandloki

I think the point being covered is some people are insisting that Michael got no money for anything associated with MHG and MHG’s clients.

Didn’t RC pay full board for the horse she owned with MHG? I’m sure any clients of MHG were paying board on their horses which would go to MBD.

[jvanrens]

@MHM

Case in point.

How many times have multiple people gone around the mulberry bush about the active shooter nonsense? Has it made a difference yet? Does it look like it’s ever going to with this one poster?

I’ve shared the FBI definition of an active shooter a couple of times, been pretty much ignored by certain posters. Proof ya can’t fix…never mind, I’ll save the mods from having to edit a flagged post.

[Jenerationx]

It’s like watching people call a mass murderer a serial killer. I just can’t. These things have meanings.

[trubandloki]

@jvanrens

@trubandloki

I think the point being covered is some people are insisting that Michael got no money for anything associated with MHG and MHG’s clients.

Didn’t RC pay full board for the horse she owned with MHG? I’m sure any clients of MHG were paying board on their horses which would go to MBD.

You are correct. That is what was testified to.
I guess some people need to watch the trial.

(Not you jvanrens.)

[smoofox]

@Rubyroo

@Knights_Mom

Put me on ignore. Your problem is solved.

I guess my post was too nuanced for you to understand.

Hmmm… I recall another discussion a while ago now about nuance…

[jvanrens]

@trubandloki

@jvanrens

@trubandloki

I think the point being covered is some people are insisting that Michael got no money for anything associated with MHG and MHG’s clients.

Didn’t RC pay full board for the horse she owned with MHG? I’m sure any clients of MHG were paying board on their horses which would go to MBD.

You are correct. That is what was testified to.
I guess some people need to watch the trial.

(Not you jvanrens.)

Thank you! I was starting to think I was losing my mind or my listening for comprehension skills.

[Davignport]

Can all of us make a conscious effort not to respond to the few posters who refuse to move on from certain things. Who cares what they think, believe, babble on about. No matter what is said, they will NEVER stop the incessant posting and who really cares what they think. Jury trial is OVER and their posts are really dragging the whole thread down. Enough is enough please.

[MHM]

@Davignport

Can all of us make a conscious effort not to respond to the few posters who refuse to move on from certain things. Who cares what they think, believe, babble on about. No matter what is said, they will NEVER stop the incessant posting and who really cares what they think. Jury trial is OVER and their posts are really dragging the whole thread down. Enough is enough please.

Once again, I concur.

It does take a lot of restraint sometimes.

[KurPlexed]

I get the feeling MB isn’t the only one that LKs driven insane. Some of “y’all” insane too.

[Rubyroo]

@Sdel

Since two of them were witnesses, they were supposed to be sequestered, not reading along about the trial and testimony on a horse forum.

Witnesses are sequestered at the judge’s discretion or if it is specifically requested by either side. There is no blanket requirement for witnesses to be sequestered.

[Sdel]

@Rubyroo

@Sdel

Since two of them were witnesses, they were supposed to be sequestered, not reading along about the trial and testimony on a horse forum.

Witnesses are sequestered at the judge’s discretion or if it is specifically requested by either side. There is no blanket requirement for witnesses to be sequestered.

This is where it helps to have watched the trial and listened to the judges instructions.