Mb civil suit rulings 11/15/2022

[Sdel]

@Moderator_1

Clicking the chain link icon below any post will generate a link that you can copy and paste in order to direct someone to a specific post on a thread, like this:

You can also get to the url for the post by clicking on the time posted in the upper corner. That option will give you the post number, exact time/date a post was made, plus give someone the option to PM the poster or start a new thread.

[trubandloki]

@Sdel

@Moderator_1

Clicking the chain link icon below any post will generate a link that you can copy and paste in order to direct someone to a specific post on a thread, like this:

You can also get to the url for the post by clicking on the time posted in the upper corner. That option will give you the post number, exact time/date a post was made, plus give someone the option to PM the poster or start a new thread.

This option does not always work for everyone.

[DownYonder]

@Moderator_1

Clicking the chain link icon below any post will generate a link that you can copy and paste

I am confused. This is how your post appears to me (I’m on a PC, not a mobile device).

Where is the chain link icon you are referring to?

[Moderator_1]

Click on the three dots that appears under any post (down by where you flag or like a post). When that menu expands, you’ll see the icon that looks like two chain links.

[ekat]

@DownYonder

Where is the chain link icon you are referring to?

Do you get these three dots down by the flag? If so, click on them. Then you get the chain.

[smoofox]

@erinmeri

@CurrentlyHorseless

See post 5524 by @Sdel

Lol. Considering I am at 4700, are you projecting?

Different devices and whatever platform you are on (Safari, Google Chrome, Firefox etc.) show different page counts. For instance, Sdel’s post that Hut-Ho QFPed was #5468 on my computer. So no, no projecting… no laughing and laughing needed.

@hut-ho78

@Sdel

I hope Barisone has subpoenaed her information from CotH to rule out if she is somehow connected to this debacle. If he has, I hope he’ll be able to sue her for defamation.

QFP

@eggbutt

Well no, considering you mentioned post 5524 I believe and this thread currently is at 4569 +/-, I have no earthly idea where to look! Do you? Can you do math? Have you seen into the future? Again, here is where screenshots really do a good job and don’t make one look foolish, especially when you double down and follow up!!

What looks a bit foolish is that some of you are not understanding that post counts people may refer to may vary… for a variety of reasons, no matter who posted what.

I do not see a “threat”.

[DownYonder]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I know that the number on the green counter works strangely. I was not using that. I was using the specific post number you get when you click the post number.

If you mean the number shown beside the green slider, it’s not a live link. ???

[DownYonder]

Got it, thanks!

[ekat]

@DownYonder

Got it, thanks!

Ok, now I want a fancy red arrow.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@DownYonder

@CurrentlyHorseless

I know that the number on the green counter works strangely. I was not using that. I was using the specific post number you get when you click the post number.

If you mean the number shown beside the green slider, it’s not a live link. ???

I am not talking about the green slider.

I’m talking about the time stamp like 3 hours or 2 days. If you click on that a very detailed time and date comes up along with a post number and a link.

[Sdel]

@SpicyPRE

My questions are: 1. was the crime scene investigation incomplete, or 2. the investigation happened and the results did not support the desired outcome. Scenario 1 speaks to incompetence, scenario 2 is much more nefarious.

Well, the phones as photographed certainly didn’t match testimony. There was none about MB’s phone except to acknowledge it in the photographs. The location and condition of LK/RG’s certainty didn’t match their testimony.

So, someone was misrepresenting things.

[DownYonder]

@ekat

Ok, now I want a fancy red arrow.

Snagit by TechSmith. Best bang for the buck when it comes to basic image editing - crop, highlight, blur, add arrows, add text, add shapes, move/cut out/stamp selected sections of the image, etc. Again, I am on a PC - not sure how it would work on a mobile device.

[Maria]

I saw that Moderator 1 was replying and I was like, well there goes my weekend reading, thread’s locked.

[ekat]

@trubandloki

On topic… Do people think Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) and Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1) will respond to their subpoenas this time or wait for the other side to make a contempt filing again?

It does not make sense to me that a lawyer (Jonathan Kanarek/@Inigo-montoya) would ignore a subpoena once, but for some reason I feel like he plans to do it again. I will be pleasantly surprised if he does the right thing and answers it.

I wonder if Jonathan Kanarek will send another private letter to the judge?

Nothing new filed as of right now.

No requests for extensions by either parties. No motions to quash. (Still no entries of appearances for either Jonathan or Kirby Kanarek).

Nothing.

So, list of possibilities:

1. Mr Silver and Mr Deininger both chose not to reissue subpoenas
2. They reissued them, but haven’t been able to serve Mom and Dad Kanarek yet
3. The Kanareks were served, but their 10 days aren’t up yet.
4. The Kanareks were served and neatly complied with the subpoenas
5. The Kanareks were served and they did the same as they did with the first subpoenas - what was it Inigo Montoya said? It was all a mistake, stuff got lost, etc…?

Hopefully we will find out soon which option it was!

[ekat]

@DownYonder

Snagit by TechSmith. Best bang for the buck when it comes to basic image editing - crop, highlight, blur, add arrows, add text, add shapes, move/cut out/stamp selected sections of the image, etc. Again, I am on a PC - not sure how it would work on a mobile device.

Thanks! I’ll check it out!

[DownYonder]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’m talking about the time stamp like 3 hours or 2 days. If you click on that a very detailed time and date comes up along with a post number and a link.

If you mean this timestamp (denoted by red arrow), it doesn’t work consistently. Sometimes I can point to a time stamp and it will come up as a link, but other times it doesn’t. I just pointed to one and it showed up as a link, but when I tried it again (same timestamp), it wasn’t a link. The system seems a bit quirky at times.

[DownYonder]

@trubandloki

It does not make sense to me that a lawyer (Jonathan Kanarek/@Inigo-montoya) would ignore a subpoena once, but for some reason I feel like he plans to do it again. I will be pleasantly surprised if he does the right thing and answers it.

IIRC, some of our legal types on this forum previously pointed out that there wasn’t much the court could do to JK other than slap him with a sanction of some sort such as contempt of court. But it sounded like the penalties for that would be pretty minimal. He is retired from practicing law, so he doesn’t have to worry about being disbarred, and since jail time for such transgressions is apparently extremely rare, I would not be surprised if he just continued to ignore subpoenas. Heck, he can always email the judge to get himself off the hook.

[MHM]

@ekat

The Kanareks were served and neatly complied with the subpoenas

Something tells me this might be the least likely option.

[jvanrens]

@ekat

@trubandloki

On topic… Do people think Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) and Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1) will respond to their subpoenas this time or wait for the other side to make a contempt filing again?

It does not make sense to me that a lawyer (Jonathan Kanarek/@Inigo-montoya) would ignore a subpoena once, but for some reason I feel like he plans to do it again. I will be pleasantly surprised if he does the right thing and answers it.

I wonder if Jonathan Kanarek will send another private letter to the judge?

Nothing new filed as of right now.

No requests for extensions by either parties. No motions to quash. (Still no entries of appearances for either Jonathan or Kirby Kanarek).

Nothing.

So, list of possibilities:

1. Mr Silver and Mr Deininger both chose not to reissue subpoenas
2. They reissued them, but haven’t been able to serve Mom and Dad Kanarek yet
3. The Kanareks were served, but their 10 days aren’t up yet.
4. The Kanareks were served and neatly complied with the subpoenas
5. The Kanareks were served and they did the same as they did with the first subpoenas - what was it Inigo Montoya said? It was all a mistake, stuff got lost, etc…?

Hopefully we will find out soon which option it was!

Thank you for the update! We appreciate your time put into checking.

[jvanrens]

@DownYonder

@CurrentlyHorseless

I’m talking about the time stamp like 3 hours or 2 days. If you click on that a very detailed time and date comes up along with a post number and a link.

If you mean this timestamp (denoted by red arrow), it doesn’t work consistently. Sometimes I can point to a time stamp and it will come up as a link, but other times it doesn’t. I just pointed to one and it showed up as a link, but when I tried it again (same timestamp), it wasn’t a link. The system seems a bit quirky at times.

It’s never worked for me. Maybe my laptop is moody?