Mb civil suit rulings 11/15/2022

[Joanne]

@hut-ho78

It’s a personal challenge to be better.

I hope you get the guidance you need to be the best version of yourself you can be.

[hut-ho78]

Why thank you!

[Angela_Freda]

@ekat

Yes. In fairness, Schellhorn said something like if he was afraid, he could have just swung the shovel (words to that affect, not a quote) instead of using the gun.

Then LK went all crazy on YouTube saying the shovel was proof of the plot and that he was going to bury her body on the farm.

One wonders if that was the much referenced bombshell?

[hut-ho78]

I found what appears to be the subpoena form which gives instructions to the party subpoenaed to contact the judge under certain circumstances. As a third party witness, I don’t see where JK erred by contacting the judge in the civil trial. Don’t know what he said to the judge so there is that.

subpoena_instructions.pdf

[Sdel]

@hut-ho78

I don’t see where JK erred by contacting the judge in the civil trial.

Based on a comprehensive review of the filing of Mr. Silver made, and a judicious use of background knowledge and context clues, I’ll go out on limb to say it probably didn’t meet the standards of the link you provided.

In fact, I bet it was more reminiscent of his CotH postings here and he ridiculed Mr. Deininger and Silver’s legal education, called them liars, claimed they were acting unethically and then provided some sort of “evidence”….

[eggbutt]

I find it interesting that one of the family members “we” continue to cause destress to because of our speculative and honest posts (most of us) just can’t stay away from lurking on these threads! I imagine these posts are much more entertaining than her little country club/Bible study groups, if she hasn’t been astracized from those groups. Let me throw a bone and question whether @Seeker1 is working the soup kitchens this holiday season? It seems like yesterday that IM tried to cause an issue because I posted I had attended Hanukkah and Christmas gatherings. Imagine that! Perhaps that was the beginning of LK’s statement of posters being antisemitic!! Twisting and turning all around the Christmas tree and Menorah!

I still believe all those who said or were mentioned as having heard or had possession of any recordings or video files must be subpoena regardless of whether mom and dad comply with the subpoenas. Lala brought this storm on her family so they should at least comply to reactions of the daughter’s actions!! Anyone wonder if installing the surveillance devices was Jonny’s idea?

[Maria]

I believe it depends on the circumstances and situation.

It would be proper for one of the parties attorney’s to file a Motion to Quash or some other type of Motion to address the problems with the subpoena.

More often than not is not proper to have ex parte communications with the judge.

[hut-ho78]

@eggbutt

I find it interesting that one of the family members “we” continue to cause destress to because of our speculative and honest posts (most of us) just can’t stay away from lurking on these threads! I imagine these posts are much more entertaining than her little country club/Bible study groups, if she hasn’t been astracized from those groups. Let me throw a bone and question whether @Seeker1 is working the soup kitchens this holiday season? It seems like yesterday that IM tried to cause an issue because I posted I had attended Hanukkah and Christmas gatherings. Imagine that! Perhaps that was the beginning of LK’s statement of posters being antisemitic!! Twisting and turning all around the Christmas tree and Menorah!

I still believe all those who said or were mentioned as having heard or had possession of any recordings or video files must be subpoena regardless of whether mom and dad comply with the subpoenas. Lala brought this storm on her family so they should at least comply to reactions of the daughter’s actions!! Anyone wonder if installing the surveillance devices was Jonny’s idea?

Destress?
Astrasized?

What do her holiday activities have to do with the trial?

Edited to correct a grammar error.

[hut-ho78]

Thank you!

[trubandloki]

@eggbutt

Lala brought this storm on her family so they should at least comply to reactions of the daughter’s actions!!

I do not disagree with this thought, but I think it was not just Lauren Kanarek who brought this on to their family. I think she did it under the guidance of other, older family members who guided her in her using the world and then torturing it when they do not do what she wants.
Not excusing Lauren, just do not think she is 100% to blame.

@hut-ho78

I found what appears to be the subpoena form which gives instructions to the party subpoenaed to contact the judge under certain circumstances. As a third party witness, I don’t see where JK erred by contacting the judge in the civil trial. Don’t know what he said to the judge so there is that.

I do believe your google law degree is failing you again.
Let me add that “presenting your reasons to the judge” comes after responding to the person who subpoenaed you, and a lawyer knows that “presenting your reasons to the judge” does not mean sending the judge a private letter.

[eggbutt]

@hut-ho78

What does her holiday activities have to do with the trial?

For heaven’s sake. You really can’t help yourself can you? Last year at this time she (@seeker1) was crowing about her soup kitchen activities as if her social efforts absolved the poor behavior of her entire family. Go find her posts on the subject yourself, you know, using the search function, mkay? But I guess it’s okay with your warped sense of fairness that what you consider okay for a Kanarek is verboten to others!

[hut-ho78]

Pardon me for the grammar error. “What do”

[3PonyFarm]

Here is a picture of Mr. S showing the jury how MB could have used the safety triangle that was in the toolbox as a ninja throwing star if he was afraid. (Actually it was close to the time he mentioned the shovel)

Edit-this post is just intended as humor about some of what I thought were equally absurd comments made by the prosecutor.

[Sdel]

That was when everyone knew the prosecution knew they lost the case.

[SoCoPony]

I I just spit out my grain.

[jvanrens]

[3PonyFarm]

It is near feeding time isn’t it!

[SoCoPony]

It was until…

[BatCoach]

@hut-ho78

Destress?
Astrasized?

What does her holiday activities have to do with the trial?

*ahem calling someone out for a basic spelling error is definitely in snarky, if not petty territory.

[I_dratherbe]

@hut-ho78

I found what appears to be the subpoena form which gives instructions to the party subpoenaed to contact the judge under certain circumstances. As a third party witness, I don’t see where JK erred by contacting the judge in the civil trial. Don’t know what he said to the judge so there is that.

Those subpoena instructions relate to proceedings before the office of administrative law and are intended to provide for parties to New Jersey administrative hearings to subpoena the witnesses for their hearings. This is NOT for civil court proceedings. Per the OAL website, “the Office of Administrative Law hears cases for most state agencies, but it does not hear cases involving the State Board of Parole, the Division of Workers Compensation, the Division of Tax Appeals, the Public Employment Relations Commission, or Department of Labor Unemployment Compensation cases.”