Mb civil suit rulings 11/15/2022

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

Generally speaking you are the only person who felt Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) was being sarcastic in that post. Everyone else read it as him attempting to threaten people. It fits the style of threats that Lauren Kanarek uses and we all know that she has learned her trade from her father.

But that aside, wondering how the police report thing is going? Ya know, the one you posted that you had read but we all know you did not read… I am sure your above post is just as accurate as that post was, right?

Really? No one else thought it was sarcasm? Even after I pointed out how it obviously was? I just don’t find it “credible” that most of the posters here failed to recognize the sarcasm.

Well, since you do not KNOW it is sarcasm, you are assuming it is sarcasm, and Jonathan Kanarek did not say it was sarcasm I do not find it weird that most people do not read it as sarcasm.

I find your sarcasm insistence to make it not a lie as believable as your police report comment.

Saying “That was sarcasm” is like telling a joke and then explaining the joke— it weakens the effect.

It’s obvious to me that it was sarcasm and not a lie. Someone who wants to call him a liar will pretend they didn’t understand it was sarcasm.

[Warmblood1]

@hut-ho78

@BatCoach

@hut-ho78

Everyone mentioned seemed well into adulthood so I never understood the panic over SafeSport since never a whisper has been mentioned about minors.

Well, until LK filed the SS report and checked the box that stated that the situation involved physical/sexual abuse of minors.

She was on the early threads crowing about it. LK is the one who created that “panic”

There was not a way to check a box that said bullying only a box that was inclusive of all sub categories.

This is absolutely absurd. The box checked that everyone clearly saw indicated either sexual and/or physical child abuse. You know that bullying does NOT fall under those categories. How you can defend this behavior, I’ll never know. It is disturbing.

@hut-ho78

@trubandloki

@hut-ho78

@BatCoach

@hut-ho78

Everyone mentioned seemed well into adulthood so I never understood the panic over SafeSport since never a whisper has been mentioned about minors.

Well, until LK filed the SS report and checked the box that stated that the situation involved physical/sexual abuse of minors.

She was on the early threads crowing about it. LK is the one who created that “panic”

There was not a way to check a box that said bullying only a box that was inclusive of all sub categories.

Then an honest person would not check the box that says physical or sexual abuse, since bullying is neither of those things.

There may have been a subcategory below but my point was the box she checked did not differentiate. The prosecutor said and the DCCP person testified that no sexual abuse was reported.

No. What the prosecutor said is that there was NO PROOF of child abuse. IE. LK made it up. Let’s be clear about that.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Sdel

Perhaps @Moderator_1 would be willing to settle the issue? The only way for SS to know the identities of the posters is for SS to have subpoenaed CotH to provide the user information.

Why do you say that?

One of the defense lawyers stated “upon information and belief” that IM was JK, and that it had not been confirmed by CotH.

You seem to assert that you know my identity, and I highly doubt that you successfully subpoenaed CotH to get the information.

[Warmblood1]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Sdel

@hut-ho78

@trubandloki

@hut-ho78

@BatCoach

@hut-ho78

Everyone mentioned seemed well into adulthood so I never understood the panic over SafeSport since never a whisper has been mentioned about minors.

Well, until LK filed the SS report and checked the box that stated that the situation involved physical/sexual abuse of minors.

She was on the early threads crowing about it. LK is the one who created that “panic”

There was not a way to check a box that said bullying only a box that was inclusive of all sub categories.

Then an honest person would not check the box that says physical or sexual abuse, since bullying is neither of those things.

There may have been a subcategory below but my point was the box she checked did not differentiate. The prosecutor said and the DCCP person testified that no sexual abuse was reported.

It’s interesting how the nobody who doesn’t know LK somehow knows the details of how LK checked the boxes. The only thing we saw was a tiny snippet of the report with no commentary on who (LK or an SS employee) actually filled out the box we saw….

Maybe someone is getting nervous about KK’s subpoena responses.

Oh, so it might have been a SS employee who completed the form based on a phone conversation with LK?

Are you now claiming that someone at SS falsely reported child abuse, not LK?

What a stretch.

[trubandloki]

@hut-ho78

Actually, MB’s reputation with the ladies was spoken about beginning in the first thread and then again in court by his good friend Tarshis. It was continued by posters here including fairly recently within the last year.

Hey @hut-ho78, can you tell me where you hear Mr. Tarshis saying that Michael is a ladies man?
I just listened to his entire testimony and he did not say anything like that. Not even close to that. He did say that him and Michael had in common that they both participated in a sport that is 90% women so that bonded over that. That in no way says either of them is a ladies man.

This one can not even be blamed on your google law degree. Maybe your creative Lauren is amazing imagination?

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

Generally speaking you are the only person who felt Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) was being sarcastic in that post. Everyone else read it as him attempting to threaten people. It fits the style of threats that Lauren Kanarek uses and we all know that she has learned her trade from her father.

But that aside, wondering how the police report thing is going? Ya know, the one you posted that you had read but we all know you did not read… I am sure your above post is just as accurate as that post was, right?

Really? No one else thought it was sarcasm? Even after I pointed out how it obviously was? I just don’t find it “credible” that most of the posters here failed to recognize the sarcasm.

Well, since you do not KNOW it is sarcasm, you are assuming it is sarcasm, and Jonathan Kanarek did not say it was sarcasm I do not find it weird that most people do not read it as sarcasm.

I find your sarcasm insistence to make it not a lie as believable as your police report comment.

Saying “That was sarcasm” is like telling a joke and then explaining the joke— it weakens the effect.

It’s obvious to me that it was sarcasm and not a lie. Someone who wants to call him a liar will pretend they didn’t understand it was sarcasm.

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

Generally speaking you are the only person who felt Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) was being sarcastic in that post. Everyone else read it as him attempting to threaten people. It fits the style of threats that Lauren Kanarek uses and we all know that she has learned her trade from her father.

But that aside, wondering how the police report thing is going? Ya know, the one you posted that you had read but we all know you did not read… I am sure your above post is just as accurate as that post was, right?

Really? No one else thought it was sarcasm? Even after I pointed out how it obviously was? I just don’t find it “credible” that most of the posters here failed to recognize the sarcasm.

Well, since you do not KNOW it is sarcasm, you are assuming it is sarcasm, and Jonathan Kanarek did not say it was sarcasm I do not find it weird that most people do not read it as sarcasm.

I find your sarcasm insistence to make it not a lie as believable as your police report comment.

Saying “That was sarcasm” is like telling a joke and then explaining the joke— it weakens the effect.

It’s obvious to me that it was sarcasm and not a lie. Someone who wants to call him a liar will pretend they didn’t understand it was sarcasm.

I am not pretending it is not sarcasm. It truly is not sarcasm. Lauren and Jonathan Kanarek have shown a history of threatening people to get what they want, this is just another example of it. Not sarcasm.

Police report?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Warmblood1

@hut-ho78

@BatCoach

@hut-ho78

Everyone mentioned seemed well into adulthood so I never understood the panic over SafeSport since never a whisper has been mentioned about minors.

Well, until LK filed the SS report and checked the box that stated that the situation involved physical/sexual abuse of minors.

She was on the early threads crowing about it. LK is the one who created that “panic”

There was not a way to check a box that said bullying only a box that was inclusive of all sub categories.

This is absolutely absurd. The box checked that everyone clearly saw indicated either sexual and/or physical child abuse. You know that bullying does NOT fall under those categories. How you can defend this behavior, I’ll never know. It is disturbing.

@hut-ho78

@trubandloki

@hut-ho78

@BatCoach

@hut-ho78

Everyone mentioned seemed well into adulthood so I never understood the panic over SafeSport since never a whisper has been mentioned about minors.

Well, until LK filed the SS report and checked the box that stated that the situation involved physical/sexual abuse of minors.

She was on the early threads crowing about it. LK is the one who created that “panic”

There was not a way to check a box that said bullying only a box that was inclusive of all sub categories.

Then an honest person would not check the box that says physical or sexual abuse, since bullying is neither of those things.

There may have been a subcategory below but my point was the box she checked did not differentiate. The prosecutor said and the DCCP person testified that no sexual abuse was reported.

No. What the prosecutor said is that there was NO PROOF of child abuse. IE. LK made it up. Let’s be clear about that.

The CPS witness stated that the visit was to investigate MHG for child neglect, not to investigate MB for sexual abuse.

[Sdel]

@Warmblood1

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Sdel

@hut-ho78

@trubandloki

@hut-ho78

@BatCoach

@hut-ho78

Everyone mentioned seemed well into adulthood so I never understood the panic over SafeSport since never a whisper has been mentioned about minors.

Well, until LK filed the SS report and checked the box that stated that the situation involved physical/sexual abuse of minors.

She was on the early threads crowing about it. LK is the one who created that “panic”

There was not a way to check a box that said bullying only a box that was inclusive of all sub categories.

Then an honest person would not check the box that says physical or sexual abuse, since bullying is neither of those things.

There may have been a subcategory below but my point was the box she checked did not differentiate. The prosecutor said and the DCCP person testified that no sexual abuse was reported.

It’s interesting how the nobody who doesn’t know LK somehow knows the details of how LK checked the boxes. The only thing we saw was a tiny snippet of the report with no commentary on who (LK or an SS employee) actually filled out the box we saw….

Maybe someone is getting nervous about KK’s subpoena responses.

Oh, so it might have been a SS employee who completed the form based on a phone conversation with LK?

Are you now claiming that someone at SS falsely reported child abuse, not LK?

What a stretch.

I think you are being purposely obtuse and twisting the things people say so that you can justify getting your features ruffled and support your narrative. It’s why you have no credibility on the forum.

It is well known that LK spoke to someone at SS over the phone and had to add false claims because they weren’t interested “in adults”.

[Warmblood1]

I’m going by the report to SS made by LK where a box for physical and/or sexual child abuse was clearly checked. There is no way you can twist that, try as you might.

Why you wish to justify that, I’ll never know.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

Generally speaking you are the only person who felt Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) was being sarcastic in that post. Everyone else read it as him attempting to threaten people. It fits the style of threats that Lauren Kanarek uses and we all know that she has learned her trade from her father.

But that aside, wondering how the police report thing is going? Ya know, the one you posted that you had read but we all know you did not read… I am sure your above post is just as accurate as that post was, right?

Really? No one else thought it was sarcasm? Even after I pointed out how it obviously was? I just don’t find it “credible” that most of the posters here failed to recognize the sarcasm.

Well, since you do not KNOW it is sarcasm, you are assuming it is sarcasm, and Jonathan Kanarek did not say it was sarcasm I do not find it weird that most people do not read it as sarcasm.

I find your sarcasm insistence to make it not a lie as believable as your police report comment.

Saying “That was sarcasm” is like telling a joke and then explaining the joke— it weakens the effect.

It’s obvious to me that it was sarcasm and not a lie. Someone who wants to call him a liar will pretend they didn’t understand it was sarcasm.

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

Generally speaking you are the only person who felt Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) was being sarcastic in that post. Everyone else read it as him attempting to threaten people. It fits the style of threats that Lauren Kanarek uses and we all know that she has learned her trade from her father.

But that aside, wondering how the police report thing is going? Ya know, the one you posted that you had read but we all know you did not read… I am sure your above post is just as accurate as that post was, right?

Really? No one else thought it was sarcasm? Even after I pointed out how it obviously was? I just don’t find it “credible” that most of the posters here failed to recognize the sarcasm.

Well, since you do not KNOW it is sarcasm, you are assuming it is sarcasm, and Jonathan Kanarek did not say it was sarcasm I do not find it weird that most people do not read it as sarcasm.

I find your sarcasm insistence to make it not a lie as believable as your police report comment.

Saying “That was sarcasm” is like telling a joke and then explaining the joke— it weakens the effect.

It’s obvious to me that it was sarcasm and not a lie. Someone who wants to call him a liar will pretend they didn’t understand it was sarcasm.

I am not pretending it is not sarcasm. It truly is not sarcasm. Lauren and Jonathan Kanarek have shown a history of threatening people to get what they want, this is just another example of it. Not sarcasm.

Police report?

So if I write a statement intending it as sarcasm, you’re the one who gets to determine whether it “truly” is or is not sarcasm?

Interesting.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Warmblood1

I’m going by the report to SS made by LK where a box for physical and/or sexual child abuse was clearly checked. There is no way you can twist that, try as you might.

Why you wish to justify that, I’ll never know.

I saw the form. The question asked whether there were concerns or allegations of abuse or sexual abuse.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

Generally speaking you are the only person who felt Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) was being sarcastic in that post. Everyone else read it as him attempting to threaten people. It fits the style of threats that Lauren Kanarek uses and we all know that she has learned her trade from her father.

But that aside, wondering how the police report thing is going? Ya know, the one you posted that you had read but we all know you did not read… I am sure your above post is just as accurate as that post was, right?

Really? No one else thought it was sarcasm? Even after I pointed out how it obviously was? I just don’t find it “credible” that most of the posters here failed to recognize the sarcasm.

Well, since you do not KNOW it is sarcasm, you are assuming it is sarcasm, and Jonathan Kanarek did not say it was sarcasm I do not find it weird that most people do not read it as sarcasm.

I find your sarcasm insistence to make it not a lie as believable as your police report comment.

Saying “That was sarcasm” is like telling a joke and then explaining the joke— it weakens the effect.

It’s obvious to me that it was sarcasm and not a lie. Someone who wants to call him a liar will pretend they didn’t understand it was sarcasm.

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

Generally speaking you are the only person who felt Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) was being sarcastic in that post. Everyone else read it as him attempting to threaten people. It fits the style of threats that Lauren Kanarek uses and we all know that she has learned her trade from her father.

But that aside, wondering how the police report thing is going? Ya know, the one you posted that you had read but we all know you did not read… I am sure your above post is just as accurate as that post was, right?

Really? No one else thought it was sarcasm? Even after I pointed out how it obviously was? I just don’t find it “credible” that most of the posters here failed to recognize the sarcasm.

Well, since you do not KNOW it is sarcasm, you are assuming it is sarcasm, and Jonathan Kanarek did not say it was sarcasm I do not find it weird that most people do not read it as sarcasm.

I find your sarcasm insistence to make it not a lie as believable as your police report comment.

Saying “That was sarcasm” is like telling a joke and then explaining the joke— it weakens the effect.

It’s obvious to me that it was sarcasm and not a lie. Someone who wants to call him a liar will pretend they didn’t understand it was sarcasm.

I am not pretending it is not sarcasm. It truly is not sarcasm. Lauren and Jonathan Kanarek have shown a history of threatening people to get what they want, this is just another example of it. Not sarcasm.

Police report?

So if I write a statement intending it as sarcasm, you’re the one who gets to determine whether it “truly” is or is not sarcasm?

Interesting.

No, I get to determine how it reads to me, and all the other posters get to determine how it reads to them.

To most of us (all except you I do believe) feel that post is a perfect example of Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) lying once again.
You have decided it is sarcasm.
We feel you are lying that it is sarcasm, to the same level as your post about the police report. Chest puffing to make yourself look good.

You are allowed to continue on thinking it is sarcasm, but it will not change that we feel it is a lie that Jonathan Kanarek told.

Do you feel his post where he called Michael a whole bunch of names, including being a felon, was not a lie? Are we supposed to think that was sarcasm too?

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

The CPS witness stated that the visit was to investigate MHG for child neglect, not to investigate MB for sexual abuse.

Still a false report.

[Warmblood1]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Warmblood1

I’m going by the report to SS made by LK where a box for physical and/or sexual child abuse was clearly checked. There is no way you can twist that, try as you might.

Why you wish to justify that, I’ll never know.

I saw the form. The question asked whether there were concerns or allegations of abuse or sexual abuse.

No, it said physical or sexual abuse. Checked YES. Stop trying to minimize her actions.

[Knights_Mom]

I too feel that IM lies quite frequently.

But as there is no penalty or punishment for lying here I believe he is one of those who figures its worth the shot.

What I consider even worse is that when IM lied about names being known it was done with the intent of alarming posters as if to warn them off of making additional posts contrary to the LK narrative. His lies had MOTIVE.

It was done to shut people up.

My opinion.

[trubandloki]

I agree with your opinion @Knights_Mom!

[Sdel]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

The CPS witness stated that the visit was to investigate MHG for child neglect, not to investigate MB for sexual abuse.

Still a false report.

In a sidebar, Bilinkas said whatever it was that was in the report, the SAME report was filed for both MHG and MB and that MHG was completely exonerated.

[Knights_Mom]

@Sdel

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

The CPS witness stated that the visit was to investigate MHG for child neglect, not to investigate MB for sexual abuse.

Still a false report.

In a sidebar, Bilinkas said whatever it was that was in the report, the SAME report was filed for both MHG and MB and that MHG was completely exonerated.

Yes. Exonerated because it was a false report.

Fake gnus.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Sdel

@Warmblood1

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Sdel

@hut-ho78

@trubandloki

@hut-ho78

@BatCoach

@hut-ho78

Everyone mentioned seemed well into adulthood so I never understood the panic over SafeSport since never a whisper has been mentioned about minors.

Well, until LK filed the SS report and checked the box that stated that the situation involved physical/sexual abuse of minors.

She was on the early threads crowing about it. LK is the one who created that “panic”

There was not a way to check a box that said bullying only a box that was inclusive of all sub categories.

Then an honest person would not check the box that says physical or sexual abuse, since bullying is neither of those things.

There may have been a subcategory below but my point was the box she checked did not differentiate. The prosecutor said and the DCCP person testified that no sexual abuse was reported.

It’s interesting how the nobody who doesn’t know LK somehow knows the details of how LK checked the boxes. The only thing we saw was a tiny snippet of the report with no commentary on who (LK or an SS employee) actually filled out the box we saw….

Maybe someone is getting nervous about KK’s subpoena responses.

Oh, so it might have been a SS employee who completed the form based on a phone conversation with LK?

Are you now claiming that someone at SS falsely reported child abuse, not LK?

What a stretch.

I think you are being purposely obtuse and twisting the things people say so that you can justify getting your features ruffled and support your narrative. It’s why you have no credibility on the forum.

It is well known that LK spoke to someone at SS over the phone and had to add false claims because they weren’t interested “in adults”.

I don’t agree that she “added false claims”. If she called SS to report the situation as it affected her as an adult, SS had a duty to ask whether there were minors at risk.

Given the tension, the presence of guns, the continuing escalation by both sides, and MBs mental state, everyone there was at risk.

[MHM]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Someone who wants to call him a liar will pretend they didn’t understand it was sarcasm.

Someone who doesn’t want to admit he’s a liar will pretend it was sarcasm.