Mb civil suit rulings 11/15/2022

[MHM]

That’s interesting.

[lazaret]

@McGurk

Also, WTF is the point of making MB out to be a womanizer?

To give credence to the claim that this was all a love triangle and a poor pathetic man stuck choosing between two women.

Just so into the ladies he couldn’t help but want to have Lauren around and want her money and attention.

It’s a weak narrative being played to try to assassinate character.

[Sdel]

@CurrentlyHorseless

You’re convinced, based on inference, that I must be a friend or relative of LK or other insider, but you don’t know my identity specifically? Or fo you know think you know my specific identity?

Nope, I dug around on who was laughing it up about CotH posters with LK on FB. Particularly the defamatory statement about me. There was enough there to connect enough dots to be reasonable sure.

[Sdel]

@lazaret

I have a question. What happens if JK/KK “comply” with the subpoena, but it can be proven that some texts, emails, and transcripts were not included in the documents provided?

[cutter99]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@cutter99

@CurrentlyHorseless

@hut-ho78

@Sdel

@CurrentlyHorseless

You seem to assert that you know my identity, and I highly doubt that you successfully subpoenaed CotH to get the information.

No subpoenas necessary to have figured it out. Only a few of LK’s friends match the level of nastiness and obtuseness of a few posters here. And trust me, with these few, there is no question what kind of people they are in that they’d be here. They were thick in it all in real time. And were happy to make fun of us all on FB as well.

You have no idea who is posting here. I have repeated many times I don’t know them. I am not friends on FB or follow on Twitter or instagram or interact on YouTube. I don’t know them personally. Now, I add I don’t know the Goodwins either because you went down that road as well. That you think you have outed posters here and “you know” and how horrible posters here is a big mistake on your part.

@hut-ho78, I don’t think @Sdel really thinks we’re insiders, relatives or friends of LK.

No, none of us thinks you are insiders, relatives or friends of LK.

WE KNOW YOU ARE!

Why else would any logical human pick such a stupid hill to die on?!?!?!

1. Who is “we”?
2. You’re making an inference. Just because an inference is logical, it is not necessarily correct.
3. You’re convinced, based on inference, that I must be a friend or relative of LK or other insider, but you don’t know my identity specifically? Or fo you know think you know my specific identity?

I have no idea of @hut-ho78 s identity. I don’t see how you would have better information.

Funny, I name not one name in this post but you automatically assume it is you two!

How hilarious!!! But if the shoe fits…

[smoofox]

@hut-ho78

Why is it that when you or other posters interpret things a certain way that is the only way and anyone who interprets it differently is lying or has no credibility? Then the personal attacks start. “Well anyone who thinks differently is morally corrupt ( or whatever nonsense).”

That actually makes me wonder how much the person saying that is lying, that they know they are lying and just thinking well everyone does it so they are to.

So can we move forward from this back and forth bickering or is that the only reason y’all are here? To bicker?

The irony in that ^ post… is interesting. And I believe the only reason some post in these threads is to foment back and forth bickering and always be “right”… but I expect we would disagree on who is the chief proponent of that.

@cutter99

No, none of us thinks you are insiders, relatives or friends of LK.

WE KNOW YOU ARE!

Why else would any logical human pick such a stupid hill to die on?!?!?!

“WE” do? Really?

The hills are often just a podium used to chime in and in some cases, just create some friction.

But to the point - can we kindly NOT start assigning names and roles to other posters? Can we please keep the thread open - as similar activity has closed threads down before?

[cutter99]

@smoofox

@hut-ho78

Why is it that when you or other posters interpret things a certain way that is the only way and anyone who interprets it differently is lying or has no credibility? Then the personal attacks start. “Well anyone who thinks differently is morally corrupt ( or whatever nonsense).”

That actually makes me wonder how much the person saying that is lying, that they know they are lying and just thinking well everyone does it so they are to.

So can we move forward from this back and forth bickering or is that the only reason y’all are here? To bicker?

The irony and hypocrisy in that ^ post… is interesting. And I believe the only reason some post in these threads is to foment back and forth bickering and always be “right”… but I expect we would disagree on who is the chief proponent of that.

@cutter99

No, none of us thinks you are insiders, relatives or friends of LK.

WE KNOW YOU ARE!

Why else would any logical human pick such a stupid hill to die on?!?!?!

“WE” do? Really?

The hills are often just a podium used to chime in and in some cases, just create some friction.

But to the point - can we kindly NOT start assigning names and roles to other posters? Can we please keep the thread open - as similar activity has closed threads down before?

I have named no one.

As far as assigning roles, once again have I???

But, once again, if the shoe fits…

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Sdel

Not exactly. You made that assumption all on your own.

“Not exactly”? Just “kinda, sorta”?

I’m pretty sure I was not the one who brought LKs sister into the discussion.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Sdel

@CurrentlyHorseless

You’re convinced, based on inference, that I must be a friend or relative of LK or other insider, but you don’t know my identity specifically? Or fo you know think you know my specific identity?

Nope, I dug around on who was laughing it up about CotH posters with LK on FB. Particularly the defamatory statement about me. There was enough there to connect enough dots to be reasonable sure.

Are you assuming I’m someone who was “laughing it up about CotH posters with LK on FB”?

I’ve never interacted with LK on FB or made defamatory statements about CotH posters on FB.

So if you’ve “connected the dots” to a FB friend of LKs, it ain’t me.

[hut-ho78]

@smoofox

@hut-ho78

Why is it that when you or other posters interpret things a certain way that is the only way and anyone who interprets it differently is lying or has no credibility? Then the personal attacks start. “Well anyone who thinks differently is morally corrupt ( or whatever nonsense).”

That actually makes me wonder how much the person saying that is lying, that they know they are lying and just thinking well everyone does it so they are to.

So can we move forward from this back and forth bickering or is that the only reason y’all are here? To bicker?

The irony in that ^ post… is interesting. And I believe the only reason some post in these threads is to foment back and forth bickering and always be “right”… but I expect we would disagree on who is the chief proponent of that.

@cutter99

No, none of us thinks you are insiders, relatives or friends of LK.

WE KNOW YOU ARE!

Why else would any logical human pick such a stupid hill to die on?!?!?!

“WE” do? Really?

The hills are often just a podium used to chime in and in some cases, just create some friction.

But to the point - can we kindly NOT start assigning names and roles to other posters? Can we please keep the thread open - as similar activity has closed threads down before?

Thank you. Agree.

[DownYonder]

@Sdel

@trubandloki

Heck, something about it could have been in that police report you did not read but said you did, if she had brought it up to the police.

Who presents to the police that a liability waiver is a “get out of murder card”, tells them they are recording someone, complains to code enforcement to get someone kicked out of their home, and yet that same person fails to mention the child abuse to anyone on scene that could have done something about it immediately?

Who does that?

[Angela_Freda]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Thanks for posting that. He refers to “frequent contributors”, so perhaps the reference to “everyone’s identities” just refers to the “frequent contributors”, perhaps 4 or 5 people.

It’s not as far fetched as I’d thought

Weaponizing SS again, really, to silence people.

[Knights_Mom]

@Angela_Freda

@CurrentlyHorseless

Thanks for posting that. He refers to “frequent contributors”, so perhaps the reference to “everyone’s identities” just refers to the “frequent contributors”, perhaps 4 or 5 people.

It’s not as far fetched as I’d thought

Weaponizing SS again, really, to silence people.

Exactly what it is.

[MHM]

Unless every person who posts here is a member of either USEF or another NGB for a different Olympic sport, safe sport is really not very relevant to the conversation. Even if they decided to take an interest in comments from assorted strangers on a random BB.

[Knights_Mom]

@MHM

Unless every person who posts here is a member of either USEF or another NGB for a different Olympic sport, safe sport is really not very relevant to the conversation. Even if they decided to take an interest in comments from assorted strangers on a random BB.

Comments which even if done by members are neither crimes nor a violation of any association rules.

[Angela_Freda]

@CurrentlyHorseless

But the USEF subpoena would be issued to CotH, not to you, wouldn’t it? Just like the MB subpoena to CotH concerning @hut-ho78 that @Sdel was wondering about.

And mods confirmed no one has required COTH give up any identities, so…
Stop. Trying. To. Intimidate. People.

[Ambitious_Kate]

@CurrentlyHorseless

So now your suspicion is that I’m one of LKs “nasty”
and “obtuse” friends? Didn’t you peg me as one of her sisters a while ago?

Of course we suspect. Why wouldn"t we? You leave plenty of clues its only natural. We won’t postulate exactly who you are, here on the board, though. But just so you know, you aren’t exactly flying under the radar.

[Angela_Freda]

@MHM

Unless every person who posts here is a member of either USEF or another NGB for a different Olympic sport, safe sport is really not very relevant to the conversation. Even if they decided to take an interest in comments from assorted strangers on a random BB.

Which is why this subpoena nonsense is, well… Nonsense

[Ambitious_Kate]

@CurrentlyHorseless

1. Who is “we”?
2. You’re making an inference. Just because an inference is logical, it is not necessarily correct.
3. You’re convinced, based on inference, that I must be a friend or relative of LK or other insider, but you don’t know my identity specifically? Or fo you know think you know my specific identity?

I have no idea of @hut-ho78 s identity. I don’t see how you would have better information.

You need to stop baiting.

[Joanne]

@trubandloki

Go listen to the video sound at the time stamp I posted above, that will amuse you further when you compare it to what someone says it is saying.

Thank you for posting the time stamp. Did I miss where HH posted a time stamp to support her statement?