MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

And LK, JK, RG & KK were okay with this development. Reveling in it.

Classy. /s

20 Likes

Klassy with a K.

15 Likes

I think of them as Krass.

12 Likes

Facilitating it.
As pressure and harassment.

Because they no longer wished to have a business relationship with them.
Who. Does. That?

18 Likes

It makes me think that they had gotten into RCs car looking for it and not knowing it was in the safe. So they decided it was lost.

7 Likes

Darn you judicial system, we just want answers to the civil suit filings that are out there.

I mean, the whole thread is about the civil case that Lauren Kanarek filed and how the Kanarek family is not playing nice with the court system in the case that they filed! I would guess the judge finds it frustrating to have to deal with these games.

Lauren Kanarek is refusing to sit for a deposition in the case she filed. That is unheard of. She is claiming covid fears all while not showing any fear of Covid anywhere else in her life, including parties after the verdict, meeting up with strangers at their barn to film her 48 hours episode, etc. But somehow Covid is a risk for a deposition… weird. I am sure the law firm uses Clorox wipes on the conference room table and has a box of those free masks.
Waiting for the judge to decide if she has to travel to where she filed the case to give a deposition.

Lauren’s father, who clearly is waist deep in Lauren’s life happenings, who happens to also have a law degree and passed the bar in NJ posted here about this case regularly as @Inigo-montoya, complete with some lie filled name calling posts full of defamatory comments. Jonathan Kanarek, the lawyer father, refused to answer his deposition in the civil case that his daughter filed. So strange that someone who is a lawyer would do that. So strange that someone who is a lawyer would have so little respect for the courts that they would be willing to got that route. There is now a contempt filing against Jonathan Kanarek because of this. Then the lawyer father has the lawyer that does not represent him file an order to quash the subpoena and limit the discovery, while saying here that it was a lawyer mistake that they had complied, he wanted to comply, he would gladly sit for a deposition.

They being Lawyer father and the mother of Lauren, Kirby Kanarek. Kirby posts here at @Seeker1. Kirby bragged here about transcribing all of the recordings and joined Lauren in boasting about all the places those transcriptions have been sent. She told us how they had so much information about the case, and how they were full of game changer stuff. Kirby Kanarek ignored the subpoena requesting those transcriptions that she bragged about having. I guess if her lawyer husband was not going to answer his subpoena he forgot to advise her to answer her subpoena. And yet another contempt filing for the Kanarek family. The lawyer that does not represent Kirby, but represents Lauren filed to have this contempt filing quashed and the discovery limited.

Oh, I almost forgot one of the best things. Jonathan Kanarek - in case you had forgotten - the lawyer father of Luaren Kanarek decided to forget even more things he learned in law school (because answering a subpoena is pretty basic stuff) and the school of court common sense and sent a private note to the judge directly. Not thru his not lawyer (aka the lawyer representing his daughter but filing things for Jonathan Kanarek), but right to the judge. Who does that?

Some other things filed that are fun - Lauren’s lawyer thinks it is highly burdensome to ask anyone but Lauren for discovery and people should just ask her, forgetting that she had previously answered that she did not have the information and that they had to find it themselves. Lauren’s lawyer also thinks that requesting the contents of phones is overly intrusive because the defense will get - gasp - shopping lists.

:hatched_chick:

32 Likes

Yes. She started the rant by saying RC allowed MB to use her gun for the shooting (because she was involved in “the plot”). Then about halfway down she said it was negligent at best to allow the gun to go missing and endanger 12 year olds (MHG’s kid was 12).

If it was planned for MB to use the gun….then it certainly wasn’t “missing”. And now we also know that the 12 year old that was being “endangered” wasn’t even on the farm and LLK should have been aware of that.

10 Likes

Who at the show?

[quote=“DownYonder, post:3337, topic:777616, full:true”]

There actually are forensics showing this scenario did not happen. No GSR on her clothes.

That is true of both sides at times… as witnessed by this thread.

2 Likes

I don’t understand your question

3 Likes

You said (HH) at the show. I think you meant someone else by that.

Your whole post was marvelous but this part especially makes me laugh.

Oh the horror of someone seeing the K’s shopping lists! I am not sure a shopping list is considered SPII. :roll_eyes:

6 Likes

I believe that is the acronym for the barn, saying that the barn was showing.

6 Likes

The world does not revolve around you. HH stands for Hawthorne Hill.

20 Likes

Does anyone know when the 12 year old left the property to go stay with his dad? Maybe he was still there when LK made that post, which would narrow down the date of it.

I will say that if I had a 12 year old kid on the same property as LK/RG, I would probably be trying to keep that 12 year old far away from them, so LK may not have known the difference after the 12 year old left town.

1 Like

Do you remember the detailed timeline ekat did? Do you remember I did one too only it included what MB and MHG were doing and saying as well? It’s all been repeated several times which people don’t seem to appreciate. Does it need to be again?

Thank, right Hawthorn Hill.

Right now it would be very embarrassing if anyone saw my shopping list. I totally butchered the spelling of Worcestershire sauce on it.

11 Likes

Thanks. I was wondering who y’all thought I was this time. Hawthorne Hill makes perfect sense in that comment.