MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

I am not a fan of Taylor. At all.

But LK’s claim that he handed her his notes is just that so far. Her claim.

I don’t know if he actually did that or not, but it’s been pretty well established that everything LK claims should be taken with the 50 pound block of salt. A grain of salt is totally insufficient for her statements.

25 Likes

Hmmm… I wonder whose phone RG actually uses. Is it his phone, in his name, that he pays for? Or is the phone in on LKs account, so technically her phone?

11 Likes

I can see Jonathan Kanarek having a conversation regarding how many judges, police chiefs, municipal inspectors, etc. he has in his pocket, similar to how Michael Corleone or Tony Soprano would! I wish I was kidding. Based on sm posts and actual evidence seen today it is certainly possible this Finish the Bastard conspiracy runs much, much deeper. :flushed:

19 Likes

While I agree with you in principle, this is serious enough that it will be brought to the attention of the State Board to determine if she is lying or not. There have been several complaints filed against Taylor so this information would blend right in with those complaints one would think. It isn’t for users of a small forum to determine whether LK is blowing smoke or not about this issue. This is serious.

If it isn’t true, I suspect Judge Stephen Taylor will not be amused.

30 Likes

If JK is not licensed in NJ can he say he’s not representing himself as an attorney, but as a citizen pro se?

2 Likes

This is true, but it should also trouble those involved that she’s making the claim.

4 Likes

I’ve had someone present a “stipulated and agreed” order for a judge to sign when they never even talked to my attorney. Plus, it was a huge bankruptcy case with hundreds of dockets filed a day, they purposefully didn’t place my name in the title so it couldn’t be searched on the docket. Even after my attorney emailed the court clerk and notified them, the docket got signed in less than 48 hours after being filed (other such dockets were being signed up to two weeks after being filed) and we had to go through all the legal hoops to challenge the fact that not only did we not agree, we were never even consulted with by opposing council.

12 Likes

Are you accusing JK of crimes again?

2 Likes

It’s this malice against the entire family that seems to taint these threads and pull them into the unhinged zone. Why do you wish ill on an entire family? It’s never been about this case or the shooting for you, it’s been personal the entire time.

5 Likes

Do you (g) think we will get to see that email that JK sent to the judge?

11 Likes

This whole mess, from start to finish, puts to rest one of my favorite quotes: “‘Courtroom drama’ is an oxymoron.”

This has got all the drama that all the other courtrooms are lacking.

18 Likes

Only if it is quoted in a legal filing.

5 Likes

It is unfortunately, probably too prejudicial to be put on public display. As of right now, JK is not an actual party to the suit yet.

4 Likes

How can anyone defend the actions and lack of actions of this family? I am dead serious. How can this behavior be justified by anyone. How inappropriate can a father and daughter be?

25 Likes

The same people who think it is OK to file a false claim involving child protective services.

38 Likes

It seems obvious JK doesn’t think Nagel is doing a good enough job if he is now directly petitioning the judge himself apparently on his daughter’s behalf!

17 Likes

True enough, but the same could be said for so many of her claims.

3 Likes

Nagel is addressing the request from Schellhorn, and points out that if SGF wants the complete data from LKs phone, they should address the request to LK first. Nagel points out that since RG is not a party to the case, he was not even notified that his complete cell phone records were being sought.

I can see why Schellhorn wanted guidance from the court before turning the complete contents of three cell phones over to the defendant.

1 Like

Excellent point

What?

Even people without jobs still have bank accounts and financial records.