MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

[eggbutt]

Free speech and all that. Got it.

[Fat_Dinah]

You posted four days ago with a post I made in April about contacting authorities about anti-Semetic remarks. You asked how my “threats” worked out.
Still want to say you have never looked up my old posts or knew I existed?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@eggbutt

@CurrentlyHorseless

You invariably accuse those who disagree with you of being LK insiders.

No, it is simply ludicrous that a complete stranger would say they contacted SS/USEF and Judge Stephen Taylor on her behalf. Why she threw in mailing a letter to Helgstrand in her post was strange as well. Simply a logical observation. No more or less. Mkay?

You have repeatedly accused me of being a Kanarek insider, and I know I’m not.

You and others have contacted SS and USEF about LKs SM behavior. Why would you be so outraged that someone would report your SM behavior?

[eggbutt]

[quote=“Fat_Dinah, post:4557, topic:777616, full:true”]

@Fat_Dinah

So this is not your post from four days ago referencing a post I made in April?

Your post is not formatted correctly.

[erinmeri]

@Fat_Dinah

I think a subpoena of Eggbutt and LO and SW would be an irrelevant fishing expeditions, just like the subpoenas for JK, LK and RG.
Darn, I have to spell SARCASM out more for readers.

You are comparing apples to oranges here. And to what end? I agree that @eggbut, LO and SW are irrelevant. The others are not. You must understand why…

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Warmblood1

You have a weird obsession with MHG. But again, no - LK specifically stated MB was plotting her murder and supposedly followed through. MHG did not shoot LK. I’m surprised I have to say that.

I know MHG did not shoot LK.

I’m just pointing out that it would be completely natural to interpret “I’m going to effing kill her” as just an expression of extreme animosity at first, then reinterpret as possibly more literal after you’ve been shot.

[erinmeri]

@Fat_Dinah

No, thanks, I communicated with 48 Hours while the episode was in production. Unless you have super secret insider info on a sequel.

Based on your previous posts on this forum, I find it really hard to believe that the producers of 48 hours think you have/had anything of note to contribute to the episode. Can you explain how that worked? Are you acquainted with either of the parties, or are you active in dressage or related disciplines? By communicated, do you mean anything beyond that you reached out to them?

[Angela_Freda]

My! That sounds expensive!

[Fat_Dinah]

No, it’s not. I am trying to quote YOUR post bringing up my April post. If someone else is more tech savvy and can do it, I would appreciate it.

[erinmeri]

I am certain this has been discussed… but for those who have such difficulty understanding how even if you had some audio recordings and/or some transcripts, why you might request either or both in discovery: what if they simply don’t match up??? What if a transcript reflects an audio recording you haven’t heard or vice versa? That seems the most compelling reason to dig for them in my opinion… not the accuracy.

[MHM]

@Maria

Who wants to help me write a reading and listening for comprehension book?

It might need to be at the See Spot Run level, since the extremely clear explanations provided by the very kind legal types on the threads have apparently gone over the heads of a few posters here.

[Sdel]

@CurrentlyHorseless

You have repeatedly accused me of being a Kanarek insider, and I know I’m not.

So, how did you know when LK’s horse was supposed to arrive from quarantine?

[Angela_Freda]

Easily done, she can just log off.

[eggbutt]

@Fat_Dinah

No, it’s not. I am trying to quote YOUR post bringing up my April post. If someone else is more tech savvy and can do it, I would appreciate it.

I doubt anyone cares or wants to go hunting.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Sdel

@CurrentlyHorseless

You have repeatedly accused me of being a Kanarek insider, and I know I’m not.

So, how did you know when LK’s horse was supposed to arrive from quarantine?

Based on something I read here. Probably something posted by IM, who actually is an insider.

[skydy]

Yes, it was the entire topic, wasn’t it? I didn’t look up the post but I remember it because I felt for Helgstrand. His organization just purchased the Chronicle and he’s already getting weird letters. The thought that he would be personally involved in censuring the forums is laughable.

[erinmeri]

@lazaret

I think people are missing the point. The claim in the suit is very specific, paragraph 41 lays it out:

“Commencing in or about April 2019, and continuing thereafter, Kanarek planned and conspired to unlawfully and tortiously blackmail, intimidate, torment, antagonize, distress, and otherwise injury(sic) Barisone for the purpose of destroying Barisone, Barisone’s business, Barisone’s personal relationships, Barisone’s mental and emotional states, and Barisone’s physical wellbeing.”

Paragraph 42 then connects the above stated actions to the creation of the recordings. The claim is for damages arising from , in other words, what the recordings were used for and at trial Kanarek openly testified that the goal of her action(s) was to ruin Barisone. Thus, the SOL, in my opinion, does not apply, because it was upon testimony at trial that the defendant was affirmed in his belief that the goals of her actions were nefarious by the plaintiff’s own admission.

For example, the use of those recordings (or transcripts thereof) in a SafeSport complaint knowingly intended to harm the defendant’s business may not have been known to defendant at the time of filing.

But even so, there is ample case law that favors amending the complaint over some kind of statute of limitations. You can amend a complaint even after it’s been decided and gone for appeal .

Thank you! You and the other are amazing!

[Sdel]

@skydy

Yes, it was the entire topic, wasn’t it? I didn’t look up the post but I remember it because I felt for Helgstrand. His organization just purchased the Chronicle and he’s already getting weird letters. The thought that he would be personally involved in censuring the forums is laughable.

IM named dropped the editor of CotH as a threat to get the same thing more than once.

[Joanne]

@Sdel

IM named dropped the editor of CotH as a threat to get the same thing more than once.

LK did, too.

[eggbutt]

Well dang, I’ve met and talked with her too. Does that make me an insider or influencer too?