Its not about a real need to show the world “who he is”. Its about her immediate need, in that moment, writing that sentence, to project herself as a genuine victim. That’s all. THere’s no future, there’s no reality, and there’s no past, just what she can say in that moment to portray herself as she wants to be seen. Very typical of 4 and 5 year olds, frankly. Very typical of addicts. They have no mind for the future, no brain which evaluates facts, they just say whatever is going to ge3t them off the hook or which will get people believeing them for the moment. What she doesn’t realize is that the reset of the world sees her very clearly. She doesn’t see herself, at all, and any time she actually can, she doesn’t care, she just tries to rewrite whatever people are saying. Very very addict-like and very sad. She’s not thinking about how her lawsuit is supposed to do that, and how she’s supposed to follow through with the law suit to her deisred ends. She just says what she says. And if you want her to come for a deposition? No. She doesn’t put two and two together, because she can’t. She has drug brain. And if she didn’t have drug brain, her other pathologies would probably act out inj the same way.
Well, LK has claimed to have multiple personalities. Does that count?
Maybe send multiple subpoenas?
I’m about 200 posts behind, I always thought that the erroneous conviction of Andy dufresne flew in the face of those who assumed that since Michael had access to the gun he MUST have driven to his farmhouse with the intention to shoot Lauren.
It’s a fictional story yes, but an excellent example of how circumstantial evidence does not equal proof. Quite frankly it’s a lazy assumption and since the shoddy police work did not give us any forensic evidence the entire situation is slim on proof which is a shame.
But how odd that Shawshank and its narrative of an innocent person in prison is the narrative she chose to # and cite, yes?
Very interesting. 
Would it be likely for the attorneys to ask about it in the deposition since they seem very interested in the SM posts?
That’s likely only if it’s brought to their attention, via screenshots, assuming they don’t already have an account that follows her posts, under stealth surveillance.
Oof. I hope the person who has that job is very well paid.
Nailed it. Emotional development stuck in toddlerhood and mental development compromised by drug brain.
Maybe it wasn’t LK who initiated the law suits. We all know she doesn’t do what she doesn’t want to do - EVER. That includes showing up for lessons, shows, depositions, appointments, etc. She may have been pushed into filing the suits and simply doesn’t care. She is well aware of all that can be revealed and perhaps she hasn’t shared that with the others involved.
How nice the thread has been without constantly rehashing minutiae. Recipes, robes, Christmas music, hearing info…this has been the old CoTH this week. 
I honestly don’t think she’s that deep.
“Raaaab, what movie is in a jail? Yah, Shawshank Redemption!”
Shawshank Exception is a Very Crude urban expression. It means a person too ugly, too vile to be sodomized.
The simplest explanation is the likliest.
She has a vile potty mouth. (See texts to GJ.)
She hangs out with some pretty low life people.
She heard the term Shawshank Exception from someone in its Urban Dictionary meaning.
She repeated it, with that meaning, without ever seeing the movie or understanding the plot.
shawshankexception: one LK used
Shawshankexemption: one in urban dictionary
Two different meaning. Someone earlier pointed this out already.
Yes, very telling.
Yes. But I think it’s likely LK just misquoted.
I think looking for subtext, layers and shades of meaning in LK’s writing is a fool’s errand.
She’s not the brightest bulb in the grow room.
So if one lawyer is representing SGF, and another lawyer is representing MB, and they seem to be coordinating and working together at this point, what happens if something comes up in the case that makes it seem as if their interests diverge?
That is why there are two different lawyers representing two different entities. They are there to protect their individual clients.
