MB CIVIL SUIT UPDATE #10 K’s Request to Adjourn (delay) DENIED 11/01/22

Thank you for providing the link to the thread so that anyone interested can assess for themselves @erinmeri s provocative accusation that any of my posts in that thread constitute “abhorrent victim blaming”. Further provocative posts regarding that thread should probably be allocated to whichever thread @erinmeri doesn’t mind getting closed by the mods.

1 Like

I would only add the specification that it should be the 50 pound salt block. Not the little four pounder.

11 Likes

How do you read things and get out of them the weird stuff that you claim to get out of them?

I doubt anyone thinks or has implied that anyone from the offices of either of those attorneys is posting here. That is such a funny and unique thing to toss out there. Oh wait. It is an example of the whole “throwing out a nasty accusation without specifics”, isn’t it?

So far your predictions have been less than accurate. I don’t think the same man who refused to take a plea deal is going to turn around and in the civil case stipulate anything like that is a fact.
It is a funny idea though. Very funny.

Threatening people now, are you?

24 Likes

I am stunned. Her arguing and victim blaming on that thread are beyond abhorrent. what the everloving fruitbat. More insight into the kind of person we are dealing with here.

28 Likes

That sounds super uncomfortable, after being double-tapped at point-blank range.

10 Likes

It’s a discussion board.

Ekat has said that nothing from the criminal trial carries over and whether he shot her will be relitigated from square one, I can imagine that even if it could be relitigated, the defense will chose not to relitigate and stipulate that he shot her, and @omare, who may be a lawyer, is raising the possibility that there will be a ruling that prevents the issue being relitigated.

This seems pretty darn germane to a discussion of the civil trial.

Which of these legal professionals are you assuming is correct?

:rofl:

Honestly, it seemed like it was a bit personal for you and Hut. I’d guess you’ve been to a few clinics……

14 Likes

The ones that didn’t have a hissy fit over the not-guilty charges.

13 Likes

What post is that, @Ambitious_Kate?

@erinmeri made a provocative claim that I had engaged in “abhorrent victim blaming” in a different thread from months ago, without quoting or linking any specific post.

The thread has been there for months and continues to be available for readers to assess whether anything I wrote constitutes victim blaming.

Wait, are we talking about the chopper/motorcycle that LK shot at herself? Or the chopper/helicopter she incorrectly claimed to ride to the hospital? So many choppers. I’m confused. Lol.

9 Likes

What is even more astonishing is the fact that she was call out, repeatedly, in that other thread for such comments as being victim blaming….

15 Likes

You can imagine anything you like for the “movies in your head.” That doesn’t make them documentaries.

18 Likes

I meant “thread” on that post I just made. Corrected it. It was disturbing what she posted, and she just kept coming with the victim blaming. I mean, why? She can’t be that clueless. There has to be something inately wrong. But her posts there speak to the circuitous chaos in her posts here. Wow.

13 Likes

I was responding to a post speculating that I had been “dispatched” to fish for possible new information obtained by Deininger’s or Silver’s offices.

Firstly, I’m not “dispatched” by anyone to do anything. But if I were, how would participating in this board allow me to “fish for information” from those offices unless someone from those offices was posting here?

I agree that it’s weird idea that someone from the lawyers offices would be posting here, but it didn’t originate with me.

This “new information” supposedly was new insight into “what actually happened” that day. I don’t think there is any such new information.

Speaking of shooting at motorcycles…I always wondered why a person of “unlimited means” had to purchase her second gun on layaway.

31 Likes

Or have her boyfriend work off her board bill.

27 Likes

I personally think that was a lie so she could cover up her FB reference to RC’s gun?

15 Likes

Well, that is its intended purpose. And yet, occasionally some see it as a lecture lounge. Or a soliloquy stage. Or a monologue mall. Or a repetition roundabout.

24 Likes

I’m more than happy for anyone interested to read my comments on that thread and judge for themselves.

Less happy with being accused of “abhorrent victim blaming” as a general smear. In my experience it’s personal bickering that gets threads shut down, especially when the bickering is created by importing a feud from a different thread from months ago.

1 Like

Yes. My point was that three different opinions on the issue of whether he shot her can and will be disputed in the civil trial have been raised, and the legal professionals have raised competing points of view.

@Sdel seemed to want that line of discussion shut down. But it strikes me as the most pertinent open question regarding the civil trial.

Would you prefer to discuss alcoholic truffles? Eggnog?