MB Civil Trial: JK/KK Contempt of Court?

[eggbutt]

Or it is simply the next move in the delay and wait them out game.

[Danvers]

WOW! Really? Can’t imagine the Kanarek’s letting him go rogue… I would think they would pay him off before letting that happen… I hope he does go rogue!

Thank you @skydy for the spelling correction!

[Sdel]

@ekat

Well, using the logic LK displayed in that tweet we saw about the Krol hearing delay, it must mean they got a report of some sort they don’t like.

Let’s not forget, Seeker has a log in. Maybe it has something to do with the thread…

[evtrmom]

ABC corporation is also a defendant? I appreciate the legal minds in this thread!

[Warmblood1]

@evtrmom

ABC corporation is also a defendant? I appreciate the legal minds in this thread!

Good eye. What’s the deal with that?

[evtrmom]

Maybe they weren’t happy with how the episode turned out
editing to add my bad, 48 hours is CBS.

[Joanne]

@evtrmom

ABC corporation is also a defendant? I appreciate the legal minds in this thread!

Not a legal mind, but I seem to recall that, like John Does 1-30, ABC corporations are placeholders for possible future lawsuits.

[evtrmom]

Ah makes sense.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Joanne

@evtrmom

ABC corporation is also a defendant? I appreciate the legal minds in this thread!

Not a legal mind, but I seem to recall that, like John Does 1-30, ABC corporations are placeholders for possible future lawsuits.

I think they’re placeholders for adding additional defendants to this lawsuit.

[Angela_Freda]

@ekat

What they are requesting now are KK’s Transcripts. These are at issue because LK used those transcripts in her complaint to SafeSport, which was part of that whole chain of events designed to drive MB literally insane. And my gut tells me they are trying to see how much KK’s transcripts, that they used against MB before the shooting, match reality.

Genius

[Joanne]

@CurrentlyHorseless

I think they’re placeholders for adding additional defendants to this lawsuit.

That makes more sense.

[Angela_Freda]

@Sdel

I think we do know that her complain involved kids. CPS was called and they showed up to talk to MHG and RC about neglect involving her kids

But they didn’t talk to MB did they?

[Knights_Mom]

Our adjournment requests on consent contained the signatures of both parties. I see only one.

[Sdel]

@Angela_Freda

@Sdel

I think we do know that her complain involved kids. CPS was called and they showed up to talk to MHG and RC about neglect involving her kids

But they didn’t talk to MB did they?

Technically they did. Michael supposedly approached them when they showed up. But CPS doesn’t always talk to the person they are really investigating at first either. MHG was the kids mother and the priority. I think it was MHG that approached RC about talking with CPS.

[LilRanger]

@FitzE

What other reasons would there be to give - legitimate reasons?

Producing the requested documents will sink your case

[Angela_Freda]

@Warmblood1

My guess is that since no physical evidence was produced with CPS, the allegation of harm towards children was dropped, and remaining “allegations for misconduct” is due to the shooting, since the permanent ban changed after the criminal trial. The fact that no evidence was produced regarding harm towards minors in the criminal trial may have influenced the change in ban status. I think if the ban were solely based on allegations of harm towards children then the ban would be totally dropped already. I think SS is considering the outcome of the Kroll hearing before another SS status change. I don’t think they want to remove the ban if for some reason MB is committed indefinitely or something like that. I don’t think indefinite commitment would ever happen, but it makes sense for a SS investigator to consider the Kroll hearing outcome.

What could be pursued, in this civil case or another, if the unfounded allegations were known to be unfounded when the calls were placed to ss and cps

[eggbutt]

Supposedly, SS frowns on frivolous, bogus reports. By now they must be aware of how vindictive LK is without restraint.

[Angela_Freda]

Right, but without speaking with MB on the matter of the kids which brought CPS to his barn, those claims went nowhere, am I remembering that right?

[Sdel]

@Angela_Freda

Right, but without speaking with MB on the matter of the kids which brought CPS to his barn, those claims went nowhere, am I remembering that right?

No….the fact that he went to jail and MHG left made the matter moot, from CPS’s point of view. The SS ban was because of the felony charges. It is an open question as to if in the last three years SS has determined the claims were without merit or if they will pick it back up once the mental health commitment is concluded.

[Angela_Freda]

@Sdel

No….the fact that he went to jail and MHG left made the matter moot, from CPS’s point of view. The SS ban was because of the felony charges. It is an open question as to if in the last three years SS has determined the claims were without merit or if they will pick it back up once the mental health commitment is concluded.

But if MHG retains whatever her custody arrangement was, doesn’t that suggest the allegations were unfounded, otherwise she might have lost that?

I’m tired, maybe that doesn’t make sense.