Michael Barisone/Lauren Kanarek Civil Suit

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@hut-ho78

they all made choices to not break the law and continue with their lives. That won’t help the defense justify MB shooting her.

As decided by law, MB also did not make a “choice” to shoot LK as he lacked mens rea.

Seriously, you’re slipping.

Who did make a choice to break law? LK and repeatedly so.

You seem to be acknowledging that MB shot her. Did you mean to do that? (@BigMama1 and @Eggbutt will be upset.)

I knew you understood actus reus/mens rea .

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Scribbler

@Sdel

@omare

(I know now everyone is rooting for MB, but how many people have borderline people in our life that could be capable of violence and a possible claim of insanity-how much responsibility do the rest of us have to take for their actions?)

Everyone has the responsibility to refrain from purposely harassing, provoking, taunting, and tortuously interfering with any other member of society’s life, relationships, and livelihoods. If Michael was doing something wrong, the she went about taking action against that the WRONG way. That IS on her and she gets to own the consequences.

Haha. From my observation MB isnt the person in this case with borderline personality disorder or a history of violence. Indeed, the longer I sit with this case and the more I learn about what JK and KK were up to, the more I honestly doubt he shot her in any straight forward fashion. I am more and more inclined to think there was an ambush that went wrong for LK. Maybe they wanted video footage of him waving a gun, then have RG disarm him and get him arrested. Something like that.

Haha. So LK and RG framed him for attempted murder.

LOL.

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@hut-ho78

they all made choices to not break the law and continue with their lives. That won’t help the defense justify MB shooting her.

As decided by law, MB also did not make a “choice” to shoot LK as he lacked mens rea.

Seriously, you’re slipping.

Who did make a choice to break law? LK and repeatedly so.

You seem to be acknowledging that MB shot her. Did you mean to do that? (@BigMama1 and @Eggbutt will be upset.)

I knew you understood actus reus/mens rea .

Did I say that? No. Seriously, reading comprehension is a thing. You should try it. I said As decided by law. We all know NGRI means lacks mens rea.

I think it’s funny you guys still think you’re winning.

[hut-ho78]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@hut-ho78

they all made choices to not break the law and continue with their lives. That won’t help the defense justify MB shooting her.

As decided by law, MB also did not make a “choice” to shoot LK as he lacked mens rea.

Seriously, you’re slipping.

Who did make a choice to break law? LK and repeatedly so.

You seem to be acknowledging that MB shot her. Did you mean to do that? (@BigMama1 and @Eggbutt will be upset.)

I knew you understood actus reus/mens rea .

Did I say that? No. Seriously, reading comprehension is a thing. You should try it. I said As decided by law. We all know NGRI means lacks mens rea.

I think it’s funny you guys still think you’re winning.

No winners in this tragedy.

[cutter99]

@Scribbler

And this is really the thread that keeps on giving. I could not believe Jonathan Kanarek is back on here Kanawrecking. I would assume this means the case is toast and the only victory possible is shit talking on a horse forum. Because you sure wouldn’t do this if your case still had legs

AMEN @Scribbler!!!

This post wins the Interwebz today!!!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Scribbler

And this is really the thread that keeps on giving. I could not believe Jonathan Kanarek is back on here Kanawrecking. I would assume this means the case is toast and the only victory possible is shit talking on a horse forum. Because you sure wouldn’t do this if your case still had legs

Dropping the nugget on information that one of the three defendants has already settled is what you consider “shit talking on a horse forum”?

LOL

[Ambitious_Kate]

I agree. Things aren’t going the K way. They won’t cooperate with their own suit, and their texts and recordings implicate them. That’s all that matters in the end.

[BigMama1]

@arktos19

For a change I was aware of the IM temper tantrum and saved screenshots before the edit

Aw I must have missed something entertaining.

[MorganSercu]

Question - IF there was a NDA signed by RC and Lauren Kanarek regarding the settlement money - would the knowledge of the amount extend to anyone who looked at Lauren Kanarek’s account balance? If she “happened to” leave her online account open or if she “happened to” leave a hardcopy bank statement laying around and someone saw it - is she in the clear?

What if the money was deposited into an account over which she had no control? Would whomever was in charge also have to sign the NDA (IF there is one)?

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

So LK and RG framed him for attempted murder.

YES! You finally understand. I am glad you finally understand. Good job for you looking at the facts.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@hut-ho78

they all made choices to not break the law and continue with their lives. That won’t help the defense justify MB shooting her.

As decided by law, MB also did not make a “choice” to shoot LK as he lacked mens rea.

Seriously, you’re slipping.

Who did make a choice to break law? LK and repeatedly so.

You seem to be acknowledging that MB shot her. Did you mean to do that? (@BigMama1 and @Eggbutt will be upset.)

I knew you understood actus reus/mens rea .

Did I say that? No. Seriously, reading comprehension is a thing. You should try it. I said As decided by law. We all know NGRI means lacks mens rea.

I think it’s funny you guys still think you’re winning.

Yes, NGRI means “yes” to actus reus and “no” to mens rea.

So you did acknowledge actus reus, in other words that the jury determined that be shot her.

I knew you knew it!

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Knights_Mom

@hut-ho78

they all made choices to not break the law and continue with their lives. That won’t help the defense justify MB shooting her.

As decided by law, MB also did not make a “choice” to shoot LK as he lacked mens rea.

Seriously, you’re slipping.

Who did make a choice to break law? LK and repeatedly so.

You seem to be acknowledging that MB shot her. Did you mean to do that? (@BigMama1 and @Eggbutt will be upset.)

I knew you understood actus reus/mens rea .

Did I say that? No. Seriously, reading comprehension is a thing. You should try it. I said As decided by law. We all know NGRI means lacks mens rea.

I think it’s funny you guys still think you’re winning.

Yes, NGRI means “yes” to actus reus and “no” to mens rea.

So you did acknowledge actus reus, in other words that the jury determined that be shot her.

I knew you knew it!

You continually twist but that in no way makes you right. Your statement has been proven wrong. Own it. You said MB willfully made a choice. His NGRI finding makes it impossible in the eyes of the law to have made that choice. Own it. You are the one stapled to this finding.

[enjoytheride]

For the love of God can people not stop responding?

[Sdel]

@Scribbler

Maybe they wanted video footage of him waving a gun, then have RG disarm him and get him arrested. Something like that.

I wonder about that missing casing and the window and the fact that RG refused to take the gun from MB while he was unconscious, yelling to put up the dog (altering the scene before the cops found it), and the description of how RG was found over MB and the conflicts of MB’s broken left arm.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

You continually twist but that in no way makes you right. Your statement has been proven wrong. Own it. You said MB willfully made a choice. His NGRI finding makes it impossible in the eyes of the law to have made that choice. Own it. You are the one stapled to this finding.

No, @Knights_Mom, I have never said that “MB willfully made a choice”.

If you think I said that, please document.

[erinmeri]

@CurrentlyHorseless

Dropping the nugget on information that one of the three defendants has already settled is what you consider “shit talking on a horse forum”?

I would consider repeatedly calling people “fools”, “complete fools”, “really clueless”, etc, and generally deriding them in a condescending manner “s#!t talking”, yes.

[McGurk]

I also wonder about this so-called “cool quarter of a million” settlement.

The only place we’ve heard this is from @InigoMontoya, who, regardless of who is using the log-in, doesn’t have a history of being truthful or credible.

I would like to see some independent corroboration that it actually happened.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@erinmeri

@CurrentlyHorseless

Dropping the nugget on information that one of the three defendants has already settled is what you consider “shit talking on a horse forum”?

I would consider repeatedly calling people “fools”, “complete fools”, “really clueless”, etc, and generally deriding them in a condescending manner “s#!t talking”, yes.

Oh, OK.

And how would you characterize posters addressing me as “clueless”, generally deriding me in a condescending manner, and constantly remarking on my supposed lack of reading comprehension and my “obtuseness”?

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Knights_Mom

For sure the presence wreaks of motive.

I sense desperation. A focused intent to save face via twisting and manipulating facts from fiction.

Can we get a definition of “wreaks” as used in this context, @Knights_Mom?

[eggbutt]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Eggbutt will be upset.

Why will I be upset? I don’t care what others believe as long as they don’t force their belief on others.