So in the Krol hearing, Simring said that Greystone was not a good option for MB but Judge T disagreed and said Greystone was a good option. At the next hearing, if it was revealed that MB did not receive the treatment recommended and the judge would still want to keep him there, how would he justify that since he thought it was a good option.
If he doesn’t release him saying he is still a danger then clearly it was not a good option and isnt likely to be one for the future.
I just hope that this time MB gets released so he can receive proper treatment.
I was going to point out the absurdity of this statement, but @trubandloki beat me to it. MB did not need an ‘invitation’ to go to his own home, esp. one that was supposed to be empty by order of the fire inspector. Utterly ridiculous.
It is hard to believe that Jonathan Kanarek @Inigo-montoya just randomly started emailing judges with that email to the judge in the civil case. I would guess he has a long history of doing it.
Thank you @Pocket_Rocket! I ran out of time and could not find that post. I knew there was something out there like that.
Here, I took a screen shot of the amazing post that Pocket_Rocket linked to in case you don’t want to go wandering into that older thread.
Agreed! Using that logic, LK kept showing up at the barn and elsewhere “uninvited”!! Did she own the property? Of course she didn’t but @CurrentlyHorseless choses to remain clueless as well as horseless.
Remember @Inigo-montoya posting that he “knew” and had spoken with all the attorneys and judge in the criminal case and, if memory serves me correctly, he implied Barisone’s attorneys thought he was guilty! Of course that was long before he was outed as being daddy himself!
I can imagine it really galls him that a bunch of “old women” keep managing to keep him backed into his corner and continue to out his BS. Thankfully he still has CH and a couple of others to swoon over him. Blech!