Thank you for posting this.
I was getting confused by people thinking that particular private letter was helping Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) with the original civil case judge. (I am not talking about any other letters to random people that Jonathan Kanarek might have sent, just this one.)
That judge immediately informed everyone about the communication.
That is not the sign of a judge being influenced by a very inappropriate letter. That is the sign of a judge who is being upfront with all parties.