I had a “squirrel” moment last night during my insomnia, and I’m hoping someone can help. Near the end of the trial, I remember Judge Taylor questioning MB about something and saying something along the line of “are you sure you want to do that”. MB responded along the line of “I’ll do whatever my attorney has recommended “. Taylor asked again if he was sure.
Anyone remember this?
At the end of the trial, it’s right here, at approx 1:29:00
It’s possible they had a similar discussion about the plea and media in the courtroom, but I haven’t seen any of the stuff that happened before the trial.
I know it happened in at least one of the hearings before the trial as well. I’m thinking it was when MB argued with the judge to stay in jail if the trial didn’t happen on time.
I think the fiancé malarkey was also for the benefit of KK’s social status with the country club and Bible study group. I can’t imagine she would like the term “shacking up” used in her circle.
I think the confusion you are having is that the person is asking about something that happened at the end of the trial, so it likely the video that @ekat posted, which is from the end of the trial.
Interesting…since the scene in the Wellington area is reaching fever pitch with many open houses (facilities) at Uber top barns, and parties galore, perhaps the K’s are attempting to horn in on such festivities and occasions to make themselves known, since they seem to be completely forgotten in the area. The perpetrator has been all but forgotten in most circles. What is that saying, out of sight out of mind?
So the tangent for today might be Vera and MB. Well, at least that was the toss up in regard to LK’s marriage. How I would like to reply to the gnat, but I will restrain.
My statement that it was a head scratcher that MBs attorneys had not impleaded RG long ago was sarcasm, VHM.
MBs attorneys would have to be fantasists to implead RG. I don’t think they’re fantasists or idiots, so I don’t think they will try to spin one of those stories in which RG is responsible.
If they did believe one of those fantasies, though, they would implead RG as part of their defense of MB.
Note that the liability of SGF and RC is not really affected by whether LK was shot by MB, RG, or by accident.
Note also that LK could implead RG as the liable party in MBs countersuit. That would reduce her % liability for the recordings, and LK would not be liable for the award against RG, if there is one. The fact that she hasn’t done so suggests she’s not that worried about the counter suit.
The whole “RG is not named in the suit because he’s penniless” is wrong. RG is not named in the suit because MBs lawyers can’t credibly pin responsibility for shooting LK on him.
How different things would be if the civil suit were tried on COTH on the basis of the majority of “likes”!
It seems so weird to me that it is so hard for some people to understand the simplest of facts that Robert Guy Goodwin/Jim E Stark/Superman is not named in this civil suit anywhere because Lauren Kanarek did not name him.
And even I understand that Lauren Kanarek can not implead RGG/JES/SM in the wiretapping counterclaim, only Michael can. So many great instructions posted here on how all that works. I wonder why some people just refuse to read them?
Your entire statement is flawed by the premise that LK acts in a logical, precise, sensible, correct, efficient manner.
The fact that she does or doesn’t do something due to her superior mental 15D calculation skills is utterly destroyed by the fact that all she had to do WAS LEAVE.
So now you’re spinning that hamster wheel trying to persuade us that her every move comes from a place of intention and planning.
The word absurd doesn’t even begin to describe it!