Is there a protocol or requirement as to who gets to be deposed first? I imagine locking someone into their version of the “facts” as soon as possible is the goal, before they can read everyone else’s version? I would think LK’s lawyer would, if possible, want LK to go last. Is there a advantage/strategy to going first?
Generally the plaintiff has the burden of proof, therefore, they go first. The defense can’t know what they are defending until the plaintiff lays out their case.
I actually never saw that post. That was Lauren’s favorite thing to say I was a grifter and well known to nc authorities…lol, they only knew me bc I had files cyberbullying charges against Lauren.
It’s not enough that people are very kindly going to the trouble to hand feed you the information with their artwork, since you seem to have difficulty grasping the written word? Now you’re going to criticize the art itself?
Not the quality of the artwork, the decision to draw a pie instead of a horse clearing a 51% hurdle.
A horse clearing a 51% “bar” would have indicated the preponderance of the evidence “standard”, and would have been, well, more horsey. The pie is great for the division of liability at the end, but not for the clearing the bar at the first stage.
Good question. I have no idea. I’d imagine the side that calls on them to sit for a deposition is the side that will have to pay for it, though.
LK has the burden of proof when it comes to her claims. So I would imagine she will want to get as much evidence from fact witnesses as she possibly can in order to do so.
Are you disputing that the standard of proof in a civil trial is “the preponderance of the evidence” and “preponderance” is interpreted as 51%?
Are you disputing that the various artists missed an opportunity to draw pretty horses clearing the 51% bar (or not) and just gave us more and more boring pies?
Stone’s recent motion to extend discovery specifies that LK is to be deposed first (completed by 3/30/2023). Then SGF and MB (completed by 6/15/2023). Followed by fact witnesses (completed by 6/15/2023). Then expert witnesses (completed by 12/15/2023).
And now I have a new question. Depositions for SGF, MB, and fact witnesses are all supposed to be completed by 6/15. What if a deposition for SGF or MB reveals a possible new “fact witness”? Can the attorneys request an extension to the fact witness deadline so they can all depose that witness? (And I assume adding that witness would have to be approved by the court and all other counsels.)
Since Sceusi decreed that LK’s deposition can happen remotely, then I’m thinking that many of the other depositions will be via Zoom. Of course, the attorneys will have to arrange for a suitable location, equipment, etc. - and that won’t be free.