Michael/ Lauren civil trial update February 9

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@cutter99

You know, I never thought we would have to explain the “like” situation to a poster who has been commenting on the board for well over a year.

If you are not receiving “likes” on posts there is most definitely a reason why.

If you cannot understand that reason why you are either 1) being willfully obtuse, 2) do not have a clue as to how to read the room, 3) are no where near as bright as you think you are, or 4) really just don’t care and are jerking people’s chains.

LO does not deserve any scorn or contempt designed to appear as sympathy. By any public account you can find of LO, she is a competent, independent mother and business woman, as well as an upper level dressage rider, training her own horses and winning. In other words, she is everything LK is not and will never be!

That another poster on this board thinks it is acceptable to back stabbingly trash LO, all the while supporting a lying, manipulative drug addict, whose admitted goal was to “FINISH THE BASTARD”, is absolutely disgusting.

There, does that explain the lack of “likes” clearly enough for even you @CurrentlyHorseless, or would you like a chart?

Do you fail to see the hypocrisy in writing thousand upon thousands of nasty, disgusting, repetitive posts trashing LK and then express outrage when someone else posts a single post saying she thinks LO might be taken advantage of?

Or the hypocrisy in writing thousands upon thousands of nasty, disgusting, repetitive posts trashing LK and then express outrage when I say MHG “dumped” MB after the shooting?

Do you fail to see the hypocrisy?

[trubandloki]

I see your adorable bear cub and raise you with one Squire L.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@cutter99

You know, I never thought we would have to explain the “like” situation to a poster who has been commenting on the board for well over a year.

If you are not receiving “likes” on posts there is most definitely a reason why.

If you cannot understand that reason why you are either 1) being willfully obtuse, 2) do not have a clue as to how to read the room, 3) are no where near as bright as you think you are, or 4) really just don’t care and are jerking people’s chains.

LO does not deserve any scorn or contempt designed to appear as sympathy. By any public account you can find of LO, she is a competent, independent mother and business woman, as well as an upper level dressage rider, training her own horses and winning. In other words, she is everything LK is not and will never be!

That another poster on this board thinks it is acceptable to back stabbingly trash LO, all the while supporting a lying, manipulative drug addict, whose admitted goal was to “FINISH THE BASTARD”, is absolutely disgusting.

There, does that explain the lack of “likes” clearly enough for even you @CurrentlyHorseless, or would you like a chart?

Do you fail to see the hypocrisy in writing thousand upon thousands of nasty, disgusting, repetitive posts trashing LK and then express outrage when someone else posts a single post saying she thinks LO might be taken advantage of?

Or the hypocrisy in writing thousands upon thousands of nasty, disgusting, repetitive posts trashing LK and then express outrage when I say MHG “dumped” MB after the shooting?

Do you fail to see the hypocrisy?

If you can not see the difference between talking about Lauren Kanarek, Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya), Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1) and Robert Guy Goodwin/Jim E Stark/Superman and Lara Osborne I think you are the one with the problem, not the rest of us.

I do wonder when/if Jonathan Kanarek and Kirby Kanarek will bother to answer their subpoenas this time? Will it be a case of third times the charm?

[ekat]

@trubandloki

I see your adorable bear cub and raise you with one Squire L.

It’s always a tough choice for me.

[trubandloki]

@ekat

@trubandloki

I see your adorable bear cub and raise you with one Squire L.

It’s always a tough choice for me.

Well, I am going to go pout because your bear cub post has more likes than my Squire L post.

[smoofox]

@erinmeri

@Fiesta01

I don’t know about anyone else, but I was totally relieved to see how large the pile of fecal matter was and how well-formed the fecal balls were.

truer words have never been spoken…

… and I cannot be the only one with some pictures of poop on my phone that I have shared with the vet after a colic case. Lovely stuff to see when you have been waiting anxiously for it to make an appearance!

@SillyHorse

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

I had a post in which I said I admired LO and referred to her as a saint. It has only one “like”.

I’m so sorry this is happening to you.

It must be so disappointing.

Awesome, just awesome!

Apparently I am not doing this forum thing right. I do not keep track of how many “likes” a post has - especially one of mine. I guess that spares me the inevitable disappointment? Meh.

Speaking of meh…

@LilRanger

I couldn’t like it because, while I would if it stood alone, I disagreed with the other paragraphs, and there isn’t a “I like this part but I’m meh on the rest” button.

This kind of button would be great - but alas, right now I will just have to bold the part I liked or snip it out of the post.

[ekat]

@trubandloki

Well, I am going to go pout because your bear cub post has more likes than my Squire L post.

It’s early still! You and SquireL are still in this!

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

Really? Then why did you insinuate that I was the one who wrote the attack or the not very credible “doxxing”?

I am opposed to “cyber harassment” whether legal or illegal.

You don’t consider Lex’s post doing into supposed details of RGs “custodial” and maybe/maybe not biological mother shacking up with the custodian of LKs synagogue while RG was a child “cyber harassment”?

How would that be available online from a public source?

CH… let me refresh your memory on exactly what I said to you yesterday in post 4861 (I think) …

“Somebody went online to a different website that lacks responsible moderation of any kind, and actually put a post up that described LexinVa in the EXACT same terms you did. They called Lex creepy and focused on research about people’s childhoods.

Another poster on that website then responded with posts that were full fledged illegal doxxing, in every sense of the word.

So you condone efforts to illegally doxx others, if they are people you consider ‘creepy’ ?”

As you can see, I actually asked you a pointed question as to whether or not you CONDONED this behavior. I didn’t accuse you of being one of the writers. I didn’t even name the site in that post (like you just accused me of doing), but multiple other people had already named and discussed it further up thread.

Anyway, the good news is that you have publicly stated:

1. You weren’t involved in this matter in any way
2. You are opposed to all forms of cyber harassment

I’m really glad to hear that.

Re bolded: Why stress that I described Lex in the EXACT same terms that the post did, if you were not trying to insinuate or suggest that I wrote the post?

No, you almost never flat out accuse anyone of anything. You’re clever. You just insinuate.

Independent professional gambler. New Jersey. Isn’t Atlantic City is NJ? RICO. Don’t we all know about the mob associations with casinos? I never accused JK of anything. Oh, and it’s all a joke.

Actually it’s not clever. Insinuation without stating the accusation is cowardly.

Either accuse me of having posted the attack on Lex or refrain from the cowardly insinuations.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@Virginia_Horse_Mom

@CurrentlyHorseless

Really? Then why did you insinuate that I was the one who wrote the attack or the not very credible “doxxing”?

I am opposed to “cyber harassment” whether legal or illegal.

You don’t consider Lex’s post doing into supposed details of RGs “custodial” and maybe/maybe not biological mother shacking up with the custodian of LKs synagogue while RG was a child “cyber harassment”?

How would that be available online from a public source?

CH… let me refresh your memory on exactly what I said to you yesterday in post 4861 (I think) …

“Somebody went online to a different website that lacks responsible moderation of any kind, and actually put a post up that described LexinVa in the EXACT same terms you did. They called Lex creepy and focused on research about people’s childhoods.

Another poster on that website then responded with posts that were full fledged illegal doxxing, in every sense of the word.

So you condone efforts to illegally doxx others, if they are people you consider ‘creepy’ ?”

As you can see, I actually asked you a pointed question as to whether or not you CONDONED this behavior. I didn’t accuse you of being one of the writers. I didn’t even name the site in that post (like you just accused me of doing), but multiple other people had already named and discussed it further up thread.

Anyway, the good news is that you have publicly stated:

1. You weren’t involved in this matter in any way
2. You are opposed to all forms of cyber harassment

I’m really glad to hear that.

Re bolded: Why stress that I described Lex in the EXACT same terms that the post did, if you were not trying to insinuate or suggest that I wrote the post?

No, you almost never flat out accuse anyone of anything. You’re clever. You just insinuate.

Independent professional gambler. New Jersey. Isn’t Atlantic City is NJ? RICO. Don’t we all know about the mob associations with casinos? I never accused JK of anything. Oh, and it’s all a joke.

Actually it’s not clever. Insinuation without stating the accusation is cowardly.

Either accuse me of having posted the attack on Lex or refrain from the cowardly insinuations.

Or…
Now, I am not VHM so I can not say for sure what they intended, because I am not inside their head.
But…
Maybe…
Just Maybe…
They are saying that the person who posted that post there came here and copied the terms you used and darn CH, you should know they are using your words.

I realize this response is not near as accusatory or fun for you as you slinging insults at VHM, but that is how I read their post.

l still think we should be discussing how Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) and Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1) have once again ignored their subpoenas.

[erinmeri]

@smoofox

… and I cannot be the only one with some pictures of poop on my phone that I have shared with the vet after a colic case. Lovely stuff to see when you have been waiting anxiously for it to make an appearance!

My horse has intermittent diarrhea and fecal water syndrome. I have more poop pics than I’d like to admit! It’s like a poop diary in my camera roll.

[ekat]

@trubandloki

l still think we should be discussing how Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) and Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1) have once again ignored their subpoenas.

Oh, maybe we could talk about how GAS is preparing LK for her deposition?

I wonder if they’ll go over this bit of criminal trial testimony?

27:50 approx

Mr Bilinkis: on august 5th two days before the shooting did you tell your father in a text message “and I confirmed for sure that they know we have a bug in the barn. Did you make that statement to your father?

LK: probably

NJ v. Michael Barisone Trial Day 3 - Cross Exam of Lauren Kanarek - Survived...

[Knights_Mom]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@cutter99

You know, I never thought we would have to explain the “like” situation to a poster who has been commenting on the board for well over a year.

If you are not receiving “likes” on posts there is most definitely a reason why.

If you cannot understand that reason why you are either 1) being willfully obtuse, 2) do not have a clue as to how to read the room, 3) are no where near as bright as you think you are, or 4) really just don’t care and are jerking people’s chains.

LO does not deserve any scorn or contempt designed to appear as sympathy. By any public account you can find of LO, she is a competent, independent mother and business woman, as well as an upper level dressage rider, training her own horses and winning. In other words, she is everything LK is not and will never be!

That another poster on this board thinks it is acceptable to back stabbingly trash LO, all the while supporting a lying, manipulative drug addict, whose admitted goal was to “FINISH THE BASTARD”, is absolutely disgusting.

There, does that explain the lack of “likes” clearly enough for even you @CurrentlyHorseless, or would you like a chart?

Do you fail to see the hypocrisy in writing thousand upon thousands of nasty, disgusting, repetitive posts trashing LK and then express outrage when someone else posts a single post saying she thinks LO might be taken advantage of?

Or the hypocrisy in writing thousands upon thousands of nasty, disgusting, repetitive posts trashing LK and then express outrage when I say MHG “dumped” MB after the shooting?

Do you fail to see the hypocrisy?

The difference being LO never did anything to anybody.

LK EARNED what she is reaping.

[CurrentlyHorseless]

@trubandloki

They are saying that the person who posted that post there came here and copied the terms you used and darn CH, you should know they are using your words.

LOL.

I don’t have a copyright on the word “creepy”, @trubandloki. I don’t care if someone else uses the word.

It gets used a lot on this forum, as in “RG doing an internet search on the location of MHGs children is creepy”.

[trubandloki]

@CurrentlyHorseless

@trubandloki

They are saying that the person who posted that post there came here and copied the terms you used and darn CH, you should know they are using your words.

LOL.

I don’t have a copyright on the word “creepy”, @trubandloki. I don’t care if someone else uses the word.

It gets used a lot on this forum, as in “RG doing an internet search on the location of MHGs children is creepy”.

Then I am confused why you just acted like it was wrong for someone to notice that someone else used the same term…

Might I remind you that I am one of the posters here who is willing to believe you that you are a nobody in this situation, not related to the Kanareks, not talking to the Kanareks. I am taking you at your word on that topic.

[Knights_Mom]

Just to be contrary.

[trubandloki]

@ekat

@trubandloki

l still think we should be discussing how Jonathan Kanarek (@Inigo-montoya) and Kirby Kanarek (@Seeker1) have once again ignored their subpoenas.

Oh, maybe we could talk about how GAS is preparing LK for her deposition?

I wonder if they’ll go over this bit of criminal trial testimony?

27:50 approx

Mr Bilinkis: on august 5th two days before the shooting did you tell your father in a text message “and I confirmed for sure that they know we have a bug in the barn. Did you make that statement to your father?

LK: probably

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dxeWZMGRlY

Oh wow, I forgot about that part. Look at her telling her father that there are bug in the barn.

At the civil trial even more of this stuff will come out, I would think.

[Joanne]

@Danvers

Word down in Welly World is that LaLa has approached BNT’s and was told there is no room in their barn(s)… and PapaPopRider is sending Nastygrams to said BNT’s… doesn’t look like the PopRiders are welcome in Welly World…

Maybe JK went down to Florida to put some muscle behind the nastygrams?

[ekat]

@trubandloki

Oh wow, I forgot about that part. Look at her telling her father that there are bug in the barn.

You know, that text right there doesn’t look good for Jonathan Kanarek, either.

@trubandloki

At the civil trial even more of this stuff will come out, I would think.

Oh, I hope GAS and Lauren are working on this, too. Because the Civil Jury might not like this exchange.

32:29
Mr Bilinkis: isn’t it a fact that part of your plan to destroy Michael Barisone was to get him kicked out of the stable area and make him homeless?

LK: maybe

48:34

Mr B: on the morning of the shooting you were angry at Michael Barisone?

LK: Yes

Mr B: and did you want that bastard finished?

LK: Yes

NJ v. Michael Barisone Trial Day 4 - Cont'd Cross Exam of Lauren Kanarek -...

[eggbutt]

Don’t forget at least 75 - 90% appear to ignore her posts!

[trubandloki]

Darn, I am still shocked every time I am reminded about what she said on the stand.

I do hope that at the civil trial she comes up with a better made-up answer than what she posted here recently when she came back to visit us.

Michael new go fund me update

Then why on earth is it necessary for posters to keep posting these disparaging rumors? It’s just the pleasure of hate. Why? It’s easy. LK set the standard by her own posts about others. Posts about people’s drinking, allegations of all sorts of things. She posted tons of stuff and still does about people from her past. So in my eyes LK is reeping what she herself has sowed. And I don’t think many people are blinking an eye about it. OK. As long as you realize you’re engaging in the beh…

Here is a screen shot of part of her post if you do not want to follow the link.

It is so weird that with the actual video available she still posts something that is incorrect and a lie.